· Private foundation
The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of THE VIRGINIA AND ALFRED HARRELL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $427k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CALIFORNIA LIVING MUSEUM FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| KERN RIVER CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| VALLEY ACHIEVEMENT CENTER | $47,437 |
| THE HUB OF BAKERSFIELD | $35,000 |
| SJV WATER | $30,000 |
| RM PYLES BOYS CAMP | $25,600 |
| TRANSFORMATIONS BY BAKERSFIELD ANGELS | $25,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA SOUTH | $25,000 |
| HELPING ANIMALS LIVE TOMORROW | $25,000 |
| LOS PADRES FOREST WATCH | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL EASTERN CALIFORNIA | $20,000 |
| APPLE CORE PROJECT INC | $20,000 |
| MERCY FOUNDATION-BAKERSFIELD | $19,602 |
| LABORERS OF THE HARVEST | $15,000 |
| ARTS COUNCIL OF KERN | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $682k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
64 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTREE FOUNDATION OF KERN INC5× · 2017–2023 · $309k · revenue +38% · 88% of their budget
- TBTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY6× · 2017–2023 · $231k · revenue +147%
- KCKERN COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · $171k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- KMKern Medical Center Foundationone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -72%
- BHBAKERSFIELD HOMELESS SHELTERone grant, 2019 · $95k
- AAALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY AND SEXUAL ASSAULTone grant, 2022 · $78k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To end homelessness in kern county through collaborative planning and action.
Provide residential and outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse.
To save homeless animals of kern county through rescue, rehabilitation, rehoming, and the promotion of spay-neuter
The specific purpose for which this corporation is organized are to provide rescue and emergency services beneficial to the public interest, to assist the Kern County Sheriff's Department, Office of Emergency Services of the State of…
Support of local retired firefighters
To represent, protect and advance the social, economic and educational interest of the farmers in kern county, california.
To create, promote and enhance business opportunities for our membership, and provide business, cultural and resource linkages, with special emphasis on the Hispanic community.
Assure community services to children
Support of local law enforcement
The primary purpose of Friends of the Kern County fair is to raise money for the benefit of the 15th district agricultural association and showcasing agricultural industries to the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kern County Museum Foundation and the most unlike its peers is SJVWater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TREE FOUNDATION OF KERN INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KERN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KERN COUNTY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOUNDATION BAKERSFIELD ↗
- Who funds KERN RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds White Wolf Wellness Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN ↗
- Who funds Kern Medical Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WOMANS CLUB OF BAKERSFIELD ↗
- Who funds Girl Scouts of Central California South Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds The Wildlands Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Kern Literacy Council ↗
- Who funds California Native Plant Society ↗
- Who funds SJVWater ↗
- Who funds THE HUB OF BAKERSFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds Bakersfield Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
- Who funds LABORERS OF THE HARVEST ↗
- Who funds CSF Medical Non Profit Foundation ↗
- Who funds FLOOD BAKERSFIELD MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Weill Child Guidance Foundation ↗
- Who funds Hoffmann Hospice of The Valley ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CLEAN AIR INC ↗
- Who funds Transformations by Bakersfield Angels ↗
- Who funds KERN PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Garden Pathways Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA LIVING MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OILDALE COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM ↗
- Who funds RM PYLES BOYS CAMP ↗
- Who funds Valley Achievement Center ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL EASTERN CALIFORNIA DBA UNITED WAY OF KERN COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kern Community Foundation · Resnick Foundation · Diane S Lake Charitable Trust Lake Diane S Ttee · Dignity Health · Valley Strong Cu Fka Kern Schools Federal Credit Union · Bakersfield Memorial Hospital · Bakersfield West Rotary-Stroope Family Foundation · The Cynthia Lake Charitable Trust · CARE - Childrens Advocates Resource Endowment · Lazzerini Family Foundation · William & Florence Wheeler Foundation · Patricia Crail Brown Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Coolidge Corner Theatre Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.