· Public charity
Regional Access Project Foundation
The REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION provides funding, oversight, technical assistance, and guidance to volunteers, community based organizations and agencies, and collaborative groups, which serve the residents of eastern riverside county in the areas of health, mental health, and juvenile interventions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $1,136,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,220,693 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $84,493 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $491k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $638k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIVERSIDE COUNTY LATINO COMMISSION | $100,000 |
| VISION TO LEARN | $100,000 |
| ABC RECOVERY CENTER | $90,000 |
| OLIVE CREST | $87,500 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT | $60,000 |
| DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - CV GI | $50,000 |
| THE JOSLYN CENTER | $50,000 |
| SHELTER FROM THE STORM | $50,000 |
| INNERCARE | $50,000 |
| FOCUS FIRST COUNSELING AND EDUCATIO | $42,000 |
| SOROPTIMIST HOUSE OF HOPE | $40,000 |
| COACHELLA VALLEY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDI | $40,000 |
| GREEN ROOM THEATRE COMPANY | $35,000 |
| GENUINE ANIMATE NAVIGATE ASSIST SUC | $35,000 |
| VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
76 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 48 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LTLIFT TO RISE7× · 2018–2025 · $529k · revenue +5%
- IEINLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC2× · 2021–2024 · $493k · revenue +103% · 40% of their budget
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT8× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CVCHERRY VALLEY HEALTHCAREone grant, 2021 · $424k
- MCMANOR CARE OF PALM DESERTone grant, 2021 · $400k
- MRMAGNOLIA REHAB & NURSINGone grant, 2021 · $400k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
Provide Independent Living Services for persons with developmental disabilities who want to live, work and socialize in the community. Including housing, assistance in entering the workforce, shopping, adult education and other community…
Provide social services to people with developmental disabilities.
The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
The mission of the Candela Group is to bring stability and an improved quality of life to our clients and their loved ones affected by mental illness by uniting them with public and private mental health services Our lived experience as…
We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.
To provide shelter and counseling for victims of domestic violence in the Barstow area.
Crf, in partnership with our clients and stakeholders, designs, delivers and evaluates innovative and exemplary behavioral health and social services in a manner that is both culturally and trauma competent, providing these services with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is The Pink Journey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LIFT TO RISE ↗
- Who funds INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds ABC RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CARAVANSERAI PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COLORADO RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds Riverside County Latino Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
- Who funds CONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · The Auen Foundation · Food in Need of Distribution Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Regional Access Project Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.