· Private foundation
The Auen Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $94k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $770k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Barbara Sinatra Children's Center at Eisenhower | $50,000 |
| Eisenhower Medical Center | $50,000 |
| Alzheimers Coachella Valley | $50,000 |
| The Palm Springs International Film Society | $50,000 |
| Rancho Mirage Writer's Festival | $35,000 |
| DAP Health | $30,000 |
| Alzheimers Coachella Valley | $30,000 |
| The Ranch Recovery Centers Inc | $30,000 |
| Joslyn Senior Center | $30,000 |
| Read With Me Volunteer Programs | $30,000 |
| Coronado Island Film Festival | $25,000 |
| Desert Arc | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| AIDS Assistance Program | $25,000 |
| Coronado Hospital Foundation | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $482k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCoronado Hospital Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $350k · revenue +75%
- EMEisenhower Medical Center3× · 2020–2024 · $198k · revenue +66%
- PSPALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +199%
Funded once
- USUSC - School of Dramatic Artsone grant, 2020 · $100k
- SJSt Jude Children's Research Hospitalone grant, 2023 · $25k
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Palm Springs Opera Guild invites everyone in the Coachella Valley and beyond to join the Guild family and participate in its numerous programs.The Guild was established in 1968 to support and promote the operatic arts through outreach,…
We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…
To provide shelter and counseling for victims of domestic violence in the Barstow area.
We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.
The coachella valley chapter of the community associations institute ("cai - cv") serves the educational, business and networking needs of community associations in the coachella valley region of southern california.
Nonprofit community theatre
The mission of the coachella valley journalism foundation is to promote and support excellent, sustainable community journalism in the coachella valley.
To stimulate, educate, and nurture creativity in the coachella valley community through the collaborative effort of membership programs, art education, and gallery space for emerging and established artists.
The mission of the friends of the desert mountains is to preserve land, to support education, conservation and research in the coachella valley, and to act as the support organization for the santa rosa & san jacinto mountains national…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elderhelp of San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Coronado Island Film Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Coronado Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds AIDS Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds The Barbara Sinatra Children's Center at Eisenhower ↗
- Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
- Who funds THE RANCH RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WELL IN THE DESERT INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
- Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
- Who funds Read With Me Volunteer Programs ↗
- Who funds ACT FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ↗
- Who funds TOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds THE DESERT SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY REPERTORY ↗
- Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗
- Who funds DESERT ARC ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds MY JUMP INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds College of the Desert Foundation ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Coronado Promenade Concerts ↗
- Who funds Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine ↗
- Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF VISTA HILL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation · Charity Works · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · Desert Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Auen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.