Skip to content
Regional Access Project Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Regional Access Project Foundation

The REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION provides funding, oversight, technical assistance, and guidance to volunteers, community based organizations and agencies, and collaborative groups, which serve the residents of eastern riverside county in the areas of health, mental health, and juvenile interventions.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$13MHousing & Shelter$1.1MHuman Services$721kCommunity Improvement$526kYouth Development$358kInternational$296kPublic Safety & Disaster$219kPhilanthropy$175kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 31 grants below total $1,136,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,220,693 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $84,493 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $491k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $638k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVERSIDE COUNTY LATINO COMMISSION$100,000
VISION TO LEARN$100,000
ABC RECOVERY CENTER$90,000
OLIVE CREST$87,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT$60,000
INNERCARE$50,000
SHELTER FROM THE STORM$50,000
THE JOSLYN CENTER$50,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - CV GI$50,000
FOCUS FIRST COUNSELING AND EDUCATIO$42,000
COACHELLA VALLEY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDI$40,000
SOROPTIMIST HOUSE OF HOPE$40,000
GENUINE ANIMATE NAVIGATE ASSIST SUC$35,000
GREEN ROOM THEATRE COMPANY$35,000
CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM OF THE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COFEM: $84k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $97k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $72k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $60k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $60k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $60k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $50k → 11%ACADEMY FOR GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATION: $35k → 14%HATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY: $34k → 14%WE ARE ONE UNITED INC: $41k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 11%WE ARE ONE UNITED INC: $30k → 11%GALILEE CENTER: $35k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE: $66k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE: $48k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $37k → 11%OPERATION SAFE HOUSE: $32k → 11%ANGEL VIEW: $34k → 11%CATHEDRAL CITY SENIOR CENTER: $29k → 11%ANGEL VIEW: $19k → 11%ANGEL VIEW: $19k → 11%COFEM: $45k → 11%COFEM: $39k → 11%RC FOUNDATION ON AGING: $41k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $36k → 11%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $28k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN: $54k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN: $25k → 11%MARTHAS VILLAGE AND KITCHEN: $20k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $108k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $100k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $100k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $92k → 11%WILEY CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $90k → 11%THE JOSLYN CENTER: $50k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $50k → 11%THE JOSLYN CENTER: $50k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $50k → 11%THE JOSLYN CENTER: $50k → 11%ABOUT FAMILIES: $39k → 11%LIFT TO RISE: $30k → 11%DESERT BEST FRIENDS CLOSET: $27k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH & SUPPORT NTWRK: $25k → 11%THE JOSLYN CENTER: $21k → 11%ELDER LOVE USA INC: $20k → 11%COVE COMMUNITY SENIOR ASSOC: $20k → 11%BARBARA SINATRA CHILDRENS CENTER: $78k → 11%BARBARA SINATRA CHILDRENS CENTER: $46k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 76 repeat orgs$8.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 48 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
107

Total granted

$8.3M
$8.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+14%

Still filing today

93%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LIFT TO RISE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $529k · revenue +5%
  • IE
    INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $493k · revenue +103% · 40% of their budget
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CV
    CHERRY VALLEY HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2021 · $424k
  • MR
    MAGNOLIA REHAB & NURSING
    one grant, 2021 · $400k
  • MC
    MANOR CARE OF PALM DESERT
    one grant, 2021 · $400k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
2
Community Housing Options Integrated Community Employment & Social Services

Provide Independent Living Services for persons with developmental disabilities who want to live, work and socialize in the community. Including housing, assistance in entering the workforce, shopping, adult education and other community…

Human Services
3
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
4
Inland Counties Regional Center Inc

Provide social services to people with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
5
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
6
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
7
Inland Temporary Homes

Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…

—
8
Hospice of the Valleys Sc Inc

We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.

Human Services
9
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
10
Candela Group

The mission of the Candela Group is to bring stability and an improved quality of life to our clients and their loved ones affected by mental illness by uniting them with public and private mental health services Our lived experience as…

Health
11
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
12
The Desert Sanctuary Inc

To provide shelter and counseling for victims of domestic violence in the Barstow area.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is The Pink Journey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
120/125
Grantees still filing
89/125
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHERRY VALLEY HEALTHCARE: $424,026 · OtherMAGNOLIA REHAB & NURSING: $400,000 · OtherMANOR CARE OF PALM DESERT: $400,000 · OtherJURUPA HILLS POST-ACUTE: $398,500 · OtherVARIOUS GRANTS UNDER 5K: $395,555 · OtherABC RECOVERY CENTER: $378,200 · Other+108 more: $8,390,831 · Other+108 moreLIFT TO RISE: $529,200 · Human ServicesLIFT TO RISEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $449,711 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SER…Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center: $212,000 · Human ServicesCove Communities …CONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA: $185,939 · Human ServicesCONSEJO DE FEDERA…OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $181,425 · Human ServicesOPERATION SAFE HO…The Barbara Sinatra Childrens Center Foundation: $123,800 · Human ServicesTHE CAROLYN E WYLIE CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $109,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $104,800 · Human Services+20 more: $731,839 · Human Services+20 moreOLIVE CREST: $299,325 · HealthOLIVE CRESTRiverside County Latino Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc: $289,384 · HealthRiverside C…VISION TO LEARN: $160,000 · HealthVISION TO L…GENUINE ANIMATE NAVIGATE ASSIST SUCCEED: $119,800 · HealthGENUINE ANI…Coachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine: $115,945 · HealthCoachella V…SOROPTIMIST HOUSE OF HOPE: $105,000 · HealthSOROPTIMIST…Focus First Counseling and Education Inc: $84,000 · HealthCLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC: $80,000 · HealthDESERT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Health+19 more: $461,811 · Health+19 moreCOLORADO RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $310,672 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER FROM THE STORM: $137,800 · Housing & ShelterINLAND EQUITY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $97,315 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterRIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $153,800 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO: $150,000 · EducationONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $98,250 · EducationFOCUS ON STUDENT SUCESS: $31,500 · EducationESCUELA DE LA RAZA UNIDA: $20,745 · EducationRAICES CULTURA: $18,800 · Education+2 more: $20,745 · EducationINLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC: $492,687 · Public BenefitCARAVANSERAI PROJECT: $330,838 · InternationalVariety - the Childrens Charity International: $43,096 · International
Other$10,787,112Human Services$2,627,714Health$1,790,265Housing & Shelter$565,787Education$493,840Public Benefit$492,687International$373,934

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFT TO RISE: $529,200 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC: $492,687 over 2y, 40% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $449,711 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetABC RECOVERY CENTER: $378,200 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCARAVANSERAI PROJECT: $330,838 over 2y, 29% of budgetCOLORADO RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $310,672 over 7y, 41% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $299,325 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRiverside County Latino Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc: $289,384 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center: $212,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA: $185,939 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetOPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC: $181,425 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $160,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMIZELL CENTER: $155,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetRIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $153,800 over 1y, 39% of budgetALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY: $151,600 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetStroke Recovery Center dba Neuro Vitality Center: $147,968 over 3y, 13% of budgetSHELTER FROM THE STORM: $137,800 over 3y, 27% of budgetThe Barbara Sinatra Childrens Center Foundation: $123,800 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetGENUINE ANIMATE NAVIGATE ASSIST SUCCEED: $119,800 over 3y, 18% of budgetCoachella Valley Volunteers in Medicine: $115,945 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CAROLYN E WYLIE CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES: $109,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $108,569 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CATHEDRAL CITY: $108,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetSOROPTIMIST HOUSE OF HOPE: $105,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $104,800 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $98,250 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetINLAND EQUITY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $97,315 over 1y, 55% of budgetFocus First Counseling and Education Inc: $84,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetAngel View Inc: $82,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM OF THE DESERT: $82,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA UNITED WAY: $80,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY: $77,174 over 1y, 12% of budgetDESERT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWE ARE ONE UNITED INC: $70,800 over 2y, 17% of budgetGreen Room Theatre Company: $69,700 over 3y, 16% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $69,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris: $64,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDESERT RECREATION FOUNDATION: $60,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetThe LGBT Sanctuary Palm Springs Inc CO Oak Grove Center: $60,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $59,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc: $59,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetACT FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: $55,745 over 2y, 27% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Palm Springs: $53,200 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetAutism Society Inland Empire Inc: $50,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFT TO RISE ↗
  • Who funds INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds ABC RECOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CARAVANSERAI PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO RIVER SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds Riverside County Latino Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
  • Who funds CONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Communi…Bighorn Golf Club Cha…HN and Frances C Berg…The Grace Helen Spear…Anderson Childrens Fo…The Champions Volunte…Impact Through Golf F…Houston Family Founda…The Coeta and Donald …The Auen FoundationFood in Need of Distr…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA133.3× affinity84 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · The Auen Foundation · Food in Need of Distribution Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Regional Access Project Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Regional Access Project Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    58report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Regional Access Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home