· Private foundation
The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of THE COETA AND DONALD BARKER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k4 grants · $435k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEACE HEALTH SACRED HEART MEDICAL | $165,000 |
| EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIO | $150,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION | $65,000 |
| MIZZELL CENTER | $55,000 |
| SOUTH WEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $44,000 |
| PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM | $36,050 |
| UNITY SHOPPE | $32,500 |
| UNITED BOYS & GIRLS OF SANTA BARBAR | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CULTURAL CENTER | $30,000 |
| SANSUM DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $30,000 |
| EUGENE MISSION | $29,500 |
| FOUNDATION OF PALM SPRINGS | $27,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
107 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $842k · revenue +182%- COCollege of the Desert Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $760k · revenue +71%
PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC7× · 2019–2025 · $322k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- LGLOOKING GLASS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICone grant, 2017 · $50k
- PSPEACEHEALTH SACRED HEART MEDICAL CEone grant, 2017 · $25k
- USUNITED SERVICE ORG BOB HOPE USOone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Smvdm is a california public benefit corporation whose mission is to foster family and youth inspired learining by creating experiences to explore ourselves, our valley, our world, and beyond. smvdm serves schools, families, and youth…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…
Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…
Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.
To conserve natural resources, agricultural land and open spaces for present and future generations.
Cancer support community valley/ventura/santa barbaras mission is to uplift and strengthen people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.
To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.
Scan's mission is to keep seniors healthy and independent.
The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.
We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is Pstest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds College of the Desert Foundation ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds GENERAL PATTON MEMORIAL INC ↗
- Who funds Angel View Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
- Who funds Sansum Diabetes Research Institute ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
- Who funds SHELTER FROM THE STORM INC ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds NBCC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds Southwestern College Foundation ↗
- Who funds Desert Forum Inc ↗
- Who funds EUGENE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BAGS OF LOVE ↗
- Who funds PARENTING NOW ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST ↗
- Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WELL IN THE DESERT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation · The Auen Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Arc of Lane County — 79% of income from government
- United Way of Lane County — 31% of income from government
- Relief Nursery Inc — 30% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Emerald Valley — 15% of income from government
- School Garden Project of Lane County — 9% of income from government
- Parenting Now — 1% of income from government
- Greenhill Humane Society Spca — 1% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine Clinic — 0% of income from government
- World Forestry Center — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.