· Private foundation
The Champions Volunteer Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $138k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $313k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTER'S BENEVOLENT FUND | $100,000 |
| RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S RELIEF FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ARMED SERVICES YMCA 29 PALMS - 2010 | $40,000 |
| SHELTER FROM THE STORM | $25,000 |
| JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTED RANGERS | $18,000 |
| FIND FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT | $15,000 |
| MIZELL SENIOR CENTER | $10,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DESERT | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE PALM SPRINGS ANIMAL SHELTER | $10,000 |
| HARPER FOR KIDS | $10,000 |
| COLLEGE OF THE DESERT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $365k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 17% of The Champions Volunteer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SHELTER FROM THE STORM INC5× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +60%- MVMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC5× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +226%
- LLLOVE & LOVE TENNIS FOUNDATION INC5× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +161%
Funded once
- NJNATIONAL JUNIOR TENNIS & LEARNINGone grant, 2017 · $10k
- TLTHE LIVWELL PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $5k
- LBLifeStream Blood Bankone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide shelter and counseling for victims of domestic violence in the Barstow area.
We foster reverence for life, relief of suffering, and compassion in loss for the terminally ill residents and their families in the communities we serve.
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…
The organization provides residential and vocation support to persons with developmental disabilities.
Provide senior citizens with nutritional meals onsight and by delivery to homebound seniors. To operate a children's center providing services to children and families of Borrego Springs that combat educational inequality, poverty and food…
The SCVCOA and the Senior Center currently serves more than 10,000 individuals annually through varied programming for the Santa Clarita Valley and Antelope Valley that includes but is not limited to: congregate and home delivered meals…
Senior concerns' mission is to provide programs and services which support and improve the health, well-being and quality of life for seniors and family caregivers.
The specific purpose of the AIDS Assistance Program is supplying nutritional support to low-income men, women, and children living with HIV/AIDS and other life threatening illnesses.
The coachella valley chapter of the community associations institute ("cai - cv") serves the educational, business and networking needs of community associations in the coachella valley region of southern california.
Cancer support community valley/ventura/santa barbaras mission is to uplift and strengthen people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS BENEVOLENT FUND ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHELTER FROM THE STORM INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE & LOVE TENNIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds Coachella Valley Mounted Rangers ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE DES ↗
- Who funds FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC ↗
- Who funds DESERT CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Stroke Recovery Center dba Neuro Vitality Center ↗
- Who funds SONGSHINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds Angel View Inc ↗
- Who funds Variety Childrens Charities of the Desert Tent 66 ↗
- Who funds COACHELLA VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
- Who funds DESERT BEST FRIENDS CLOSET ↗
- Who funds Food Now Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds Harper For Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds LOVING ALL ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GALILEE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOROPTIMIST HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds DESERT ARC ↗
- Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Childrens Services of the Desert ↗
- Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Inland Empire Community Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Desert Community Foundation · The Auen Foundation · Impact Through Golf Foundation · Coachella Valley Wellness Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Champions Volunteer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.