Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION

REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,489,476 to it, the largest being The James Irvine Foundation ($1,000,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$3.2M
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$3.5M
Net assets
$6.4M
8/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 38%
01What it does

What Regional Access Project Foundation does

Mission

The Regional Access Project Foundation provides funding, oversight, technical assistance, and guidance to volunteers, community based organizations and agencies, and collaborative groups, which serve the residents of eastern riverside county in the areas of health, mental health, and juvenile interventions. The Regional Access Project Foundation's vision is to be a resource for these organizations and individuals in the desert communities preparing for and providing services in order to enable an enhanced quality of life for all inhabitants of eastern riverside county.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Grant making rap provides funding to nonprofits addressing health, mental health and juvenile intervention unmet needs. The following are examples of services and programs funded: programs for seniors, youth and disadvantaged populations with an emphasis on remote communities; the colorado river senior center, and several cooling centers; palm springs, thermal, mecca, and blythe. The mental health initiative was initially approved in may 2014 through 2019. Request for proposals (rfp) were released to proactively focus on specific areas identified by the community as high priorities. In the fall of 2019, the rap board expanded the rfps to include health-mental health programs/projects and addressing juvenile intervention services through our small grants. The mental health initiative has continued through 2024 with an emphasis on under-served communities. The desert fast-pitch annual competition is an innovative and creative way for pre-qualified nonprofits to learn how to improve their communication, presentation, and marketing skills. Rap awards cash grants and provides workshops and one-on-one coaching over several weeks to help build the capacity of nonprofits.

    $1,821,937 spentof which $1,658,654 as grants$792,591 earned by the program
    48% of program spending
  2. Nonprofit organization centric (npoc) raps npoc program is the only program of its kind in eastern riverside county. Npoc provides professional services and support to nonprofit organizations in order to assist them with their capacity building efforts and to help them achieve financial sustainability. The following are examples of npoc services: providing nonprofit consultants with expertise in the following areas: board development, strategic planning, budgeting, marketing, financial planning, etc. Offering workshops in nonprofit capacity building topics including but not limited to: human resources, grant writing, grant research, budgeting, and financial management. Hosting the annual conference featuring an inspirational speaker to raise awareness of the nonprofit contributions to our community and providing networking opportunities. Provide affordable office space and free meeting space and copying services to nonprofits.

    $1,752,785 spentof which $984,188 as grants$424,631 earned by the program
    46% of program spending
  3. Nonprofit rentals in addition to the cost reductions of the office space, rap also provides conference room availabilities for free. Not only do these organizations utilize funds towards helping their clients, but they find collaborations facilitated by the presence of other nonprofits in the same building.

    $103,261 spent$157,160 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  4. Serving as fiscal agent to the county of riverside and other nonprofits rap continues to serve as the fiscal agent to the fourth supervisorial county supervisors office for the annual senior inspiration awards and the youth advisory council. We are responsible for administering the respective funds (issuing checks, paying invoices, and reconciling bank accounts), and include the accounts in our annual audits.

    $123,702 spent
    3% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,801,685.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.5M) Net assets 100 ($5.0M)2018 Revenue 122 ($2.1M) Expenses 111 ($1.7M) Net assets 108 ($5.4M)2019 Revenue 105 ($1.8M) Expenses 134 ($2.1M) Net assets 103 ($5.2M)2020 Revenue 170 ($2.9M) Expenses 116 ($1.8M) Net assets 125 ($6.3M)2021 Revenue 576 ($9.9M) Expenses 616 ($9.5M) Net assets 132 ($6.6M)2022 Revenue 137 ($2.4M) Expenses 118 ($1.8M) Net assets 141 ($7.1M)2023 Revenue 154 ($2.7M) Expenses 197 ($3.1M) Net assets 133 ($6.7M)2024 Revenue 244 ($4.2M) Expenses 301 ($4.7M) Net assets 125 ($6.3M)2025 Revenue 187 ($3.2M) Expenses 203 ($3.1M) Net assets 127 ($6.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (187)Expenses (203)Net assets (127)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $5.3M to $6.7M (+27%).

$5.1M
$5.6M
$5.3M
$6.7M
$7.2M
$7.2M
$7.0M
$7.3M
$6.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 75% · 2018 64% · 2019 79% · 2020 73% · 2021 90% · 2022 74% · 2023 93% · 2024 58% · 2025 74%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

76% of REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$174k
’17
$394k
’18
−$266k
’19
$1.1M
’20
$386k
’21
$539k
’22
−$392k
’23
−$459k
’24
$88k
’25
5.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Leticia De Lara

CEO

Board chair

Jan Pye

Chairperson

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed201921212017192223
Joined·+5+3+3+0+1+3+6+4
No longer listed·61314133
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $205k → $624k.

3 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 29% of grant income and the top three 81%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION.

29%
largest funder
81%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 98% · 2018 53% · 2019 81% · 2020 72% · 2021 72% · 2022 90% · 2023 86% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

95% of REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION's grant income comes from California funders.

SD
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $948k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION is better cushioned than half of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve5.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 20%Fundraising 3%

Governance

21
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION?
REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,489,476 to it, the largest being The James Irvine Foundation ($1,000,000). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $3,489,476 in grants to REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION?
The James Irvine Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $1,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing