· Public charity
Providence Health & Services - Washington
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k50 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k32 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+14 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVERETT TRANSITIONAL CARE SERVICES FOUNDATION | $3,291,000 |
| PROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION | $2,566,997 |
| PROVIDENCE MOUNT ST VINCENT FOUNDATION | $2,518,225 |
| PROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION | $2,249,944 |
| CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC | $1,516,500 |
| PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION | $1,200,772 |
| BRIGHTSIDE BENEFIT INC | $750,000 |
| PROVIDENCE HOSPICE & HOME CARE FOUNDATION SNOHOMISH COUNTY | $521,724 |
| PROVIDENCE ST MARY FOUNDATION | $455,896 |
| PROVIDENCE HOSPICE OF SEATTLE FOUNDATION | $427,961 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA | $381,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES EASTERN WA | $340,693 |
| ANCHORAGE COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS | $300,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE OF AK | $250,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE | $210,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $12.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
180 repeat relationships — 80 still active in FY2024, 100 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $698k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ETEVERETT TRANSITIONAL CARE SERVICES5× · 2020–2024 · $9.1M · revenue +210% · 48% of their budget
- PIPROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +67% · 25% of their budget
- PAPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +162%
Funded once
- PTPROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3.6M · revenue +38%
- ACAlaska Coalition on Housing and Homelessnessone grant, 2022 · $500k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLANDone grant, 2022 · $411k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…
Trade association dedicated to providing educational opportunities, legal and regulatory advice, quality compliance assistance, lobbying and discounted group member benefits for long-term care facilities.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences educates and trains health care professionals emphasizing service among rural and medically under-served communities throughout the Northwest.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
Improving health by providing high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Alaska Foundation and the most unlike its peers is New Life Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
294 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 294 of the 363 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERETT TRANSITIONAL CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE INLAND NORTHWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE MOUNT ST VINCENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE GENERAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE TRINITYCARE HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE TEACHING HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOSPICE OF SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HOSPICE & HOME CARE FOUNDATION SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Spokane Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE TREATMENT AND RECOVERY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ST MARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSIDE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social Services ↗
- Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds Northwest Justice Project ↗
- Who funds Partners with Families and Children Spokane ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds Innovia Foundation ↗
- Who funds INLAND NORTHWEST HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Beans Cafe Inc ↗
- Who funds Frontier Behavioral Health ↗
- Who funds The Alaska Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE MARIANWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES OF CARE CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN HEALTH ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds KODIAK ISLAND HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds SEWARD PREVENTION COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Providence Alaska Foundation · Multicare Health System · Rasmuson Foundation · Better Health Together · The Alaska Community Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Women Helping Women Fund · Innovia Foundation · Project Beauty Share · United Way of Spokane County · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Numerica Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Providence Health & Services - Washington funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Grande Ronde Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Brightside Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.