Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER

INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $478,832 to it, the largest being INATAI FOUNDATION ($225,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$774k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$479k
Net assets
$2.2M
7/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 40%
01What it does

What Intercommunity Peace and Justice Center does

Mission

Ipjc builds community to work for systemic world change through social justice education and community organizing.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The intercommunity peace & justice center's (ipjc) general programs include creating educational materials, hosting educational events and programs, workshops and panels.

    $458,237 spent
    72% of program spending
  2. The youth action team internship empowers female-identifying catholic high school juniors and seniors to act for social change in their local communities. Through faith-based community organizing workshops, this internship builds interns' confidence in their identities, nurtures unique leadership gifts, and teaches interns to strategically build movements for social change. Through intern-centered formation, workshops, and diverse spiritual practices, we cultivate a deep sense of agency and solidarity, ensuring that each intern leaves the program knowing they are powerful and capable of creating positive social change.

    $92,963 spent
    15% of program spending
  3. Justice for women : a collaborative education project low-income women across faith-based organizations. Justice for women empowers women who are low-income to address the underlying causes of poverty by forming women's justice circles. To date, over 300 circles were formed.

    $89,468 spent
    14% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $640,668.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($472k) Expenses 100 ($419k) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 113 ($533k) Expenses 111 ($463k) Net assets 106 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 123 ($580k) Expenses 116 ($487k) Net assets 114 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 103 ($489k) Expenses 121 ($506k) Net assets 136 ($1.5M)2021 Revenue 137 ($648k) Expenses 123 ($514k) Net assets 174 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 129 ($607k) Expenses 123 ($515k) Net assets 173 ($2.0M)2023 Revenue 142 ($668k) Expenses 149 ($622k) Net assets 181 ($2.0M)2024 Revenue 146 ($692k) Expenses 163 ($683k) Net assets 189 ($2.1M)2025 Revenue 164 ($774k) Expenses 188 ($788k) Net assets 191 ($2.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (164)Expenses (188)Net assets (191)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.7M to $2.1M (+22%).

$1.3M
$1.3M
$1.4M
$1.7M
$2.1M
$2.0M
$2.1M
$2.2M
$2.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 0% · 2023 14%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$54k
’17
$70k
’18
$93k
’19
−$17k
’20
$135k
’21
$93k
’22
$47k
’23
$9k
’24
−$14k
’25
0.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

William Rutt

Executive director

Board chair

John Hickman

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed4444514161516
Joined·+1+0+0+5+10+8+0+3
No longer listed·10041612
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $35k → $268k.

6 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 24% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

80% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER.

47%
largest funder
77%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 31% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 44% · 2021 59% · 2022 35% · 2023 84% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

100% of INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $114k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

88%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER?
INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $478,832 to it, the largest being INATAI FOUNDATION ($225,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $478,832 in grants to INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER?
INATAI FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $225,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Intercommunity Peace and Justice Center →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing