Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Numerica Credit Union

Credit union operated without profit for mutual purposes.

$861k
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$832kEducation$510kHousing & Shelter$468kYouth Development$349kFood & Nutrition$295kCrime & Legal$257kCommunity Improvement$220kHealth$199kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $732k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER SPOKANE INC$53,025
YMCA$46,700
FAMILY PROMISE OF SPOKANE$37,178
SECOND HARVEST$36,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS BENTON-FRANKLIN COUNTIES$35,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$35,000
COEUR D'ALENE ON ICE$26,844
SAFE PASSAGE$26,400
HOOPFEST$26,000
GRACE KITCHEN$26,000
VANESSA BEHAN$25,100
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS SPOKANE COUNTY$22,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTH IDAHO$22,000
BIG TABLE$20,700
WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $746k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCHANCHOR HOUSE: $21k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 9%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $17k → 8%NWCUA FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%WENATCHEE VALLEY YMCA: $20k → 9%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $14k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $11k → 8%CHILDRENS VILLAGE: $26k → 10%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 8%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $15k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $20k → 11%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $13k → 10%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $10k → 10%SAFE HARBOR SUPPORT CENTER: $20k → 11%YWCA NC WA: $13k → 9%TESH INC: $8k → 10%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $13k → 9%B5 LEARNING CENTER: $16k → 11%SAFE PASSAGE: $26k → 10%SAFE PASSAGE: $25k → 10%SAFE PASSAGE: $25k → 10%CHAPLAINCY HEALTH CARE: $20k → 11%SAFE PASSAGE: $25k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $13k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $15k → 11%SAFE PASSAGE: $13k → 10%MIRROR MINISTRIES: $11k → 11%CHELAN DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $10k → 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES: $13k → 11%SNAP RESOURCE RIDES: $15k → 12%SNAP: $10k → 12%SNAP: $10k → 12%EMBRACE WASHINGTON: $6k → 12%YMCA: $47k → 12%YWCA: $26k → 12%YWCA: $26k → 12%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $15k → 12%YWCA SPOKANE: $13k → 12%COMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $9k → 12%SPOKANE QUARANTEAM: $10k → 12%TRANSITIONS- WOMEN'S HEALTH: $20k → 12%SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS: $16k → 12%SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS: $10k → 12%TRANSITIONS: $15k → 12%SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS: $10k → 12%TRANSITIONS: $13k → 12%SPOKANE VALLEY PARTNERS: $8k → 12%TRANSITIONS: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 54 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
44

Total granted

$3.2M
$467k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+0%

Still filing today

87%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST
    6× · 2017–2024 · $173k · revenue +46%
  • FP
    Family Promise of Spokane
    6× · 2018–2024 · $165k · revenue ×13
  • EW
    Eastern Washington University Foundation
    3× · 2017–2021 · $150k · revenue +316%

Funded once

  • WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -20%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Spokane Countygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +351%
  • TC
    Tri-Cities Chaplaincy
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visit Spokane

The mission of Visit Spokane is to help promote economic development for Spokane County through tourism and tourism promotion.

—
2
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
3
Spokane Area Workforce Development Council

The SWC mobilizes partnerships, data-driven innovation,and strategic investment to build an equitable workforce ecosystem where every individual can access opportunity, every business can find talent, and every community can thrive.

Community Improvement
4
Pacific Northwest Economic Region Foundation

To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…

—
5
Community Health Association of Spokane

The mission of the Community Health Association of Spokane (CHAS Health) is to improve the overall health of the communities we serve by expanding access to quality health and wellness services.

Health
6
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
7
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
8
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
9
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
10
Spokane Alliance

To build broad-based non-partisan civic power organizations in the Spokane region to address the fundamental common needs of the community including the inequities, and injustices facing low-income people and persons subjected to…

Community Improvement
11
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
12
Chelan Valley Hope

Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners Inland Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Cdaide Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySpokane Community Developme…Family Support ServicesPoverty Support ServicesYouth Sports & Community Re…Family Foundations & Grantm…Regional Community SupportCommunity Theater & Perform…Industry Trade AssociationsTri-Cities Regional Organiz…Christian K-12 SchoolsRegional Healthcare Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr17%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr17%22%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/108
the rest of the field
12%
601/4,840

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/97
Grantees still filing
62/97
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC — $106,400 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCWomen & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen — $75,000 · OtherSpokane Regional Chamber of Commerce — $72,905 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $70,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $64,045 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BENTON & FRANKLIN — $62,500 · OtherSAGE ADVOCACY CENTER — $62,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity - Spokane — $65,050 · Other+51 more — $1,114,499 · Other+51 moreWOMEN'S CENTER INC — $114,065 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER INCYWCA North Central Washington — $111,603 · Human ServicesYWCA North Central Wash…IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $72,186 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INCMirror Ministries — $59,207 · Human ServicesMirror MinistriesTransitions — $55,000 · Human ServicesTransitionsCANOPY VILLAGE INC — $50,500 · Human ServicesCANOPY VILLAGE INCDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES — $48,212 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVI…PARTNERS INLAND NORTHWEST — $44,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS INLAND NORTHWE…SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS — $35,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $27,700 · Human Services+16 more — $187,269 · Human Services+16 moreEastern Washington University Foundation — $150,300 · EducationEastern Washin…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF BENTON-FRANKLI — $145,400 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN…SPOKANE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $71,000 · EducationSPOKANE COLLEG…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SPOKANE COUNTY — $42,830 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN…WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $22,171 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Education+5 more — $48,000 · Education+5 moreVANESSA BEHAN — $157,468 · Crime & LegalSPOKANE REGIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COALITION — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCHELAN-DOUGLAS VOLUNTEER Attorney Services — $10,280 · Crime & LegalCREATE YOUR STATEMENT — $10,000 · Crime & LegalFamily Promise of Spokane — $165,337 · ReligionCDAIDE Inc — $22,500 · ReligionBY THE WELL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · ReligionSERVE WENATCHEE VALLEY — $10,000 · ReligionCup of Cool Water — $7,500 · ReligionSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $173,000 · Food & NutritionINLAND NORTHWEST FARMERS MARKET ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $5,225 · Food & NutritionThe Big Table — $110,700 · PhilanthropyInnovia Foundation — $66,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,692,399Human Services$804,742Education$499,701Crime & Legal$227,748Religion$215,337Food & Nutrition$188,225Philanthropy$176,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $173,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise of Spokane — $165,337 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN — $157,468 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetEastern Washington University Foundation — $150,300 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF BENTON-FRANKLI — $145,400 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC — $114,065 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetYWCA North Central Washington — $111,603 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetThe Big Table — $110,700 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetWomen & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen — $75,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSpokane Regional Chamber of Commerce — $72,905 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $72,186 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPOKANE COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $71,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $70,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetInnovia Foundation — $66,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity - Spokane — $65,050 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $64,045 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAGE ADVOCACY CENTER — $62,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMirror Ministries — $59,207 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES — $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTransitions — $55,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSPOKANE HOOPFEST ASSOCIATION — $53,562 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCANOPY VILLAGE INC — $50,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSPOKANE REGIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COALITION — $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF BENTON & FRANKLIN COUNTIES — $48,212 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGeneration Alive — $45,350 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetWomen Helping Women Fund — $45,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPARTNERS INLAND NORTHWEST — $44,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF NORTH IDAHO INC — $43,736 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SPOKANE COUNTY — $42,830 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHIP OF SPOKANE COUNTY DBA COMMUNITY MINDED ENTERPRISES — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRI-CITY REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMER — $39,695 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNUMERICA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $39,001 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGrace Collective — $38,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSpokane Guilds' School & Neuromuscular Center — $37,381 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGirl Scouts of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho — $37,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN HELPING WOMEN FUND TRI-CITIES — $35,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetSPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest — $32,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKADLEC FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOLUMBIA INDUSTRIES — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOEUR DALENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $28,399 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $27,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRAVE WARRIOR PROJECT — $25,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCDAIDE Inc — $22,500 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetWENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $22,171 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Spokane County — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTri-Cities Chaplaincy — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Avista FoundationInnovia FoundationWomen Helping Women F…First Interstate Banc…Second Harvest Inland…Multicare Health Syst…Providence Health & S…Project Beauty ShareUnited Way of Spokane…School's Out Washingt…Inatai FoundationLamb Weston Charitabl…
The Avista FoundationWA79.4× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · Women Helping Women Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · Multicare Health System · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Project Beauty Share · United Way of Spokane County · School's Out Washington · Inatai Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Numerica Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home