· Private foundation
The Avista Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k522 grants · $837k
- $10k–50k48 grants · $736k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $320k
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Eastern Washington University Foundation | $350,000 |
| Upper Columbia Resource Conservation and Development District | $60,000 |
| Gonzaga University | $55,000 |
| Spokane Symphony | $55,000 |
| Spokane Area Business Foundation | $50,000 |
| Spokane Area Business Foundation | $50,000 |
| Pullman Regional Hospital Foundation | $50,000 |
| Inland Northwest Land Conservancy | $41,666 |
| Friends of KSPS | $40,000 |
| United Human Services of AK | $31,250 |
| Community Cancer Fund | $30,000 |
| Washington State University Foundation | $27,150 |
| Gonzaga University | $25,000 |
| Community Cancer Fund | $25,000 |
| Providence INW Foundation | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $400k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
428 repeat relationships — 292 still active in FY2025, 136 since wound down; 152 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $566k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EWEastern Washington University Foundation5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY5× · 2021–2025 · $277k · revenue +40%- UOUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $236k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- LAList Available Upon Requestone grant, 2020 · $2.5M
- PAPanhandle Affordable Housing Allianceone grant, 2024 · $50k
- INInland NW Museum of Arts and Cultureone grant, 2024 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Spokane River Forums mission is to create materials, events and activities that promote regional dialogues for sustaining a healthy river system while meeting the needs of a growing population.
The mission of Visit Spokane is to help promote economic development for Spokane County through tourism and tourism promotion.
Committed to fostering relationships between members and the community. to serve the interest of members by acting as a catalyst for a vibrant sustainable economy.
we're an arts non profit that serves underserved artists through our residency program
Read Northwest exists to elevate Early Childhood Literacy in Southwest Washington.
The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…
The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Idaho and the most unlike its peers is Lake City Fastpitch Nc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
548 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 548 of the 940 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Eastern Washington University Foundation ↗
- Who funds United Way of Spokane County ↗
- Who funds Innovia Foundation ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Spokane Symphony Society ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED HUMAN SERVICES OF SE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Spokane Area Business Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KSPS ↗
- Who funds Upper Columbia RC&D ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CANCER FUND ↗
- Who funds VANESSA BEHAN ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Spokane ↗
- Who funds CHENEY DEPOT SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds ASOTIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Smith-Barbieri Progressive Fund a Charitable Foundation · Numerica Credit Union · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · Women Helping Women Fund · Project Beauty Share · Empire Health Foundation · United Way of Spokane County · Multicare Health System · Pierce Charitable Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Better Health Together · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Avista Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Klamath Watershed Partnership Bill Lehman — 100% of income from government
- Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time — 42% of income from government
- Douglas County Children's Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Ross Ragland Theater and Cultural C — 11% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Historical Society Inc — 4% of income from government
- Southern Oregon University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Avista Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Avista Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.