· Public charity
Women Helping Women Fund
Empowering Spokane area women and children to achieve their fullest potential, by building a strong, diverse community of educated, engaged, and strategic givers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $286,069 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $381,448 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,379 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $280k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Thrive International | $21,010 |
| Partners with Families & Children | $21,000 |
| Lumen Public School | $20,000 |
| Joya Child & Family Development | $20,000 |
| Maddie's Place | $20,000 |
| Vanessa Behan | $20,000 |
| Women & Children's Free Restaurant | $20,000 |
| YWCA | $20,000 |
| Women's Healing and Empowerment Network | $20,000 |
| Volunteers of America Eastern Washington | $20,000 |
| Manzanita House | $15,000 |
| Embrace Washington | $15,000 |
| Family Promise of Spokane | $15,000 |
| Shades of Motherhood Network | $13,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Spokane County | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $486k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWomen & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen9× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +159%
- TTransitions8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +12%
- YWYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION7× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +130%
Funded once
- NYNortheast Youth and Family Servicesone grant, 2024 · $25k
- DYDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICESone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -14%
- CACompassionate Addiction Treatmentgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +90%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The SWC mobilizes partnerships, data-driven innovation,and strategic investment to build an equitable workforce ecosystem where every individual can access opportunity, every business can find talent, and every community can thrive.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
To nurture and sustain child-centered, antiracist early learning communities.Our work is to:1) Help families access high quality childcare and after-school care.2) Increase the availability of high-quality care through coaching and…
To prepare a diverse range of students for a life of learning in post-secondary education, citizenship, and leadership.
To provide youth at risk due with housing and opportunities for personal growth, education, spiritual growth, job skill training from a christian worldview
Programs for children with special needs from birth to six. sparc offers opportunities for family education, participation and support so that familiies may become more knowledgeable about their childs needs and goals are are better able…
Sage Indigenous Law Center's mission is to provide culturally grounded civil legal aid that protects the rights of Native American parents, children, and communities, while advancing justice and addressing systemic inequities.
The mission of Visit Spokane is to help promote economic development for Spokane County through tourism and tourism promotion.
To build broad-based non-partisan civic power organizations in the Spokane region to address the fundamental common needs of the community including the inequities, and injustices facing low-income people and persons subjected to…
To make known the gifts of people with development disabilities, revealed through mutually transforming relationships, to foster an environment in community that responds to the changing needs of members while being faithful to the core…
Provide care to refugee families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners Inland Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Create Your Statement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Women & Children's Free Restaurant & Community Kitchen ↗
- Who funds Transitions ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds VANESSA BEHAN ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds Partners with Families and Children Spokane ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Spokane ↗
- Who funds Innovia Foundation ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds HIP OF SPOKANE COUNTY DBA COMMUNITY MINDED ENTERPRISES ↗
- Who funds Feast Collective ↗
- Who funds Lumen Public School ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOC ↗
- Who funds Spokane Guilds' School & Neuromuscular Center ↗
- Who funds CREATE YOUR STATEMENT ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OPEN-SHOP APPRENTICESHIP AND JOURNEYMAN TRAINING ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT BEAUTY SHARE ↗
- Who funds Northeast Youth Center ↗
- Who funds Spark Central ↗
- Who funds CAREER PATH SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ↗
- Who funds SNAP FINANCIAL ACCESS ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds HUMANITIES WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds A REFUGE TRAUMA INFORMED THERAPIES ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE REGIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COALITION ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Northeast Youth and Family Services ↗
- Who funds INLAND NORTHWEST FARMERS MARKET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Thrive International ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Morning Star Boys Ranch ↗
- Who funds MADDIE'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Multicare Health System · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Numerica Credit Union · Better Health Together · Smith-Barbieri Progressive Fund a Charitable Foundation · United Way of Spokane County · Project Beauty Share · School's Out Washington · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Empire Health Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women Helping Women Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.