Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance

The organization is a catalyst for putting vulnerable young children on a path to success.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
119
Grants FY2025still arriving
49
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$20MEducation$12MPublic Benefit$5.1MCivil Rights$4.6MCrime & Legal$4.5MYouth Development$3.7MCommunity Improvement$3.1MPhilanthropy$2.3MHealth$655kOther$22M
02FY2025 · 119 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 119 grants below total $11,295,899 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,713,665 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $417,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $602k
  • $50k–250k91 grants · $7.7M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.0M
$75,000
Median grant
49
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC$600,000
SCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND ADVOCACY$550,000
FAMILY FORWARD OREGON$500,000
OLE EDUCATION FUND$500,000
VIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION$500,000
COLORADO PARENT COALITION$300,000
ZERO TO THREE$235,000
CENTER FOR LAW & SOCIAL POLICY CLASP$200,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHILDREN IN POVERTY$175,000
I BE BLACK GIRL$100,000
SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES$100,000
ALASKA CHILDRENS TRUST$100,000
NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE - MIAMI$100,000
GROUNDWORK OHIO ORGANIZATION$100,000
PARENT FOR HEALTHY HOMES$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $15.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TRICOUNTY PLAY COLLABORATIVE: $100k → 11%arkansas advocates for children & families: $165k → 17%MICHIGAN'S CHILDREN: $105k → 16%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC: $160k → 14%KIDS WIN MISSOURI: $100k → 21%KIDS FORWARD: $195k → 10%CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $110k → 11%ALASKA CHILDRENS TRUST: $100k → 22%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $100k → 23%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $110k → 16%CHILD TRENDS CT: $225k → 8%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK: $110k → 19%Zero to Three: $300k → 14%MICHIGAN'S CHILDREN: $100k → 16%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC: $150k → 14%Wisconsin Council of Children and Familie: $125k → 10%CLAYTON EARLY LEARNING: $205k → 12%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $110k → 16%CHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA: $355k → 7%CHILD TRENDS CT: $200k → 8%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK: $100k → 19%ZERO TO THREE: $268k → 14%Kansas Action for Children: $125k → 14%KIDS FORWARD: $100k → 10%Clayton Early Learning: $140k → 12%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSE: $100k → 16%CHILD TRENDS CT: $135k → 8%CHILDRENS INSTITUTE: $185k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $250k → 14%WASHINGTON'S CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $175k → 9%CHILD TRENDS CT: $125k → 8%CHILDRENS INSTITUTE: $175k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $250k → 14%WASHINGTON'S CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $175k → 9%CHILD TRENDS CT: $125k → 8%CHILDRENS INSTITUTE: $175k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $250k → 14%WASHINGTON'S CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $175k → 9%ZERO TO THREE: $241k → 14%WASHINGTON'S CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $175k → 9%ZERO TO THREE: $240k → 14%washington's children's alliance: $140k → 9%ZERO TO THREE: $240k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $235k → 14%WASHINGTON'S CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $110k → 9%Child Trends: $240k → 14%National Black Child Development Inst: $125k → 14%DC ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $110k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70M · 140 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

140 repeat relationships — 87 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

140
63

Total granted

$70M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+25%

Still filing today

81%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue ×12 · 33% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +23%
  • ZT
    ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SC
    SCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND AD
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • ST
    Save the Children Action Network
    one grant, 2022 · $263k · revenue +24%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISL
    one grant, 2022 · $205k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

Human Services
2
Minnesota Child Care Resource and Referral Network

Child care aware of minnesota was incorporated in 1992 to provide technical assistance, training and coordination for the child care resource and referral programs throughout minnesota, to collect data regarding the supply of and demand…

Human Services
3
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
4
Children and Youth Justice Center

The center for children & youth justice was founded in 2006 with one mission: reform the child welfare and juvenile justice systems to improve the lives of generations of children and youth in washington state. our focus is large-scale,…

Crime & Legal
5
Yes Every Kid Inc

yes. every kid. is a leading advocacy team with a families-first approach to transform America's education policy landscape.

—
6
Washington State Child Care Resource & Referral Network Dba Child Care Aware Wa

Child care aware of washington provides thorough and independent information and support for families seeking quality child care, for child care programs seeking to improve quality, and for effective policy making.

—
7
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
8
Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance

The organization is a catalyst for putting vulnerable young children on a path to success. our goal is to advance state policies that lead to improved health, learning, and family support outcomes for young children ages birth through…

Human Services
9
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
10
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
11
Oregon Child Development Coalition

Oregon child development coalition is dedicated to improving the lives of children and families by providing early childhood education, care and advocacy with unique and supportive services to enhance family growth and community success.

Human Services
12
Partners in Child Development Inc

To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Americas Children and the most unlike its peers is The Rodel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …United Way AffiliatesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Immigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/205
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,360

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

171 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 171 of the 236 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
167/171
Grantees still filing
112/171
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Council for a Strong America — $1,953,750 · OtherCouncil for a Strong AmericaCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN — $1,653,088 · OtherCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGNNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $1,482,386 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTERMAINE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $1,020,000 · OtherNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $1,003,749 · OtherTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $950,000 · Other+101 more — $19,272,019 · Other+101 morePOLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC — $2,831,000 · Human ServicesPOLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHI…ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $2,274,000 · Human ServicesZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTE…FAMILY FORWARD OREGON — $1,607,374 · Human ServicesFAMILY FORWARD OREGONCHILD TRENDS INC — $1,350,031 · Human ServicesCHILD TRENDS INCCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $1,153,750 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ALLIANCEKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,035,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA — $917,250 · Human ServicesADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $740,000 · Human ServicesMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC — $733,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOW — $706,000 · Human ServicesGEORGE W CLAYTON TRUST — $698,612 · Human Services+22 more — $5,468,521 · Human Services+22 moreVIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION — $1,783,000 · EducationVIRGINIA EARLY CH…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $1,458,333 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIAT…TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION POLICY AND RESEARCH — $960,000 · EducationTENNESSEANS FOR Q…STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN INC — $844,000 · EducationSTRATEGIES FOR CH…RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $830,333 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSIT…BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $714,583 · EducationBANK STREET COLLE…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $550,000 · EducationJAMES B HUNT JR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY FDN — $512,111 · EducationPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC — $498,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $440,000 · EducationGROUNDWORK OHIO — $425,000 · Education+15 more — $3,035,508 · Education+15 moreSCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND ADVOCACY INC — $2,185,000 · Public BenefitNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES — $1,470,000 · Public BenefitCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $550,000 · Public BenefitTHE CENTER FOR MICHIGAN — $427,000 · Public BenefitBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC — $354,167 · Public Benefit+2 more — $90,000 · Public BenefitTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $1,700,000 · Civil RightsMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE — $670,500 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $559,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $423,700 · Civil RightsSave the Children Action Network — $262,500 · Civil RightsI BE BLACK GIRL — $200,000 · Civil RightsUtah Children — $185,000 · Civil RightsNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $185,000 · Civil Rights+6 more — $442,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY — $2,403,917 · Crime & LegalTexans Care For Children Inc — $805,000 · Crime & LegalTEAM FOR WEST VIRGINIA CHILDREN — $485,000 · Crime & LegalChildren At Risk — $354,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC — $205,000 · Crime & LegalELEPHANT CIRCLE — $150,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $80,500 · Crime & LegalRHODE ISLAND KIDS COUNT INC — $1,692,018 · Youth DevelopmentPENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN — $891,500 · Youth DevelopmentEARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC — $600,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S FUNDING PROJECT — $232,632 · Youth DevelopmentLET'S GROW KIDS INC — $170,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $75,000 · Youth Development
Other$27,334,992Human Services$19,514,538Education$12,050,868Public Benefit$5,076,167Civil Rights$4,628,200Crime & Legal$4,483,417Youth Development$3,661,150

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC — $2,831,000 over 9y, 33% of budgetCENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY — $2,403,917 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $2,274,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND ADVOCACY INC — $2,185,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetCouncil for a Strong America — $1,953,750 over 8y, 42% of budgetVIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION — $1,783,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $1,700,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetRHODE ISLAND KIDS COUNT INC — $1,692,018 over 9y, 34% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN — $1,653,088 over 9y, 23% of budgetFAMILY FORWARD OREGON — $1,607,374 over 4y, 41% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $1,482,386 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES — $1,470,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN — $1,458,333 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCHILD TRENDS INC — $1,350,031 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $1,153,750 over 8y, 14% of budgetKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,035,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetMAINE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $1,020,000 over 9y, 28% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $1,003,749 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION POLICY AND RESEARCH — $960,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $950,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA — $917,250 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN — $891,500 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetSTRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN INC — $844,000 over 9y, 24% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $830,333 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTexans Care For Children Inc — $805,000 over 8y, 8.9% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $740,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC — $733,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $714,583 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $706,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CAMPBELL INSTITUTE — $705,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetGEORGE W CLAYTON TRUST — $698,612 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE — $670,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $645,021 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FIRST INC — $605,927 over 8y, 16% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC — $600,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $595,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetEARLY YEARS INC — $570,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $559,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $550,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $550,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $535,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND — $528,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetJAMES B HUNT JR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY FDN — $512,111 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetDC ACTION FOR CHILDREN TODAY DC ACT — $500,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetNC CHILD — $500,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC — $498,000 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $487,000 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetTEAM FOR WEST VIRGINIA CHILDREN — $485,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL POLICY ↗
  • Who funds ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds SCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND ADVOCACY INC ↗
  • Who funds Council for a Strong America ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA EARLY CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE OLE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds RHODE ISLAND KIDS COUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FORWARD OREGON ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CHILD TRENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEANS FOR QUALITY EARLY EDUCATION POLICY AND RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE AWARE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texans Care For Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN NOW ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPBELL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE W CLAYTON TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds EARLY YEARS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pritzker Family Found…Annie E Casey Foundat…WK Kellogg FoundationPartnership for Ameri…The David and Lucile …Third Sector New Engl…The Irving Harris Fou…Rockefeller Philanthr…New Venture FundCenter on Budget and …Hopewell FundThe Heising-Simons Fo…
Pritzker Family FoundationIL90.9× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pritzker Family Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Partnership for Americas Children · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Third Sector New England Inc · The Irving Harris Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · New Venture Fund · Center on Budget and Policy Priorities · Hopewell Fund · The Heising-Simons Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Advancing Connecticut Together Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Florida Association of Healthy Start Coalitions — 95% of income from government
  • Maryland Family Network Inc — 66% of income from government
  • Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • The Campbell Institute — 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 236 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines