Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pinpoint Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$5.1MHealth$1.8MCrime & Legal$1.7MCivil Rights$1.5MEducation$525kInternational$463kHousing & Shelter$391kArts & Culture$390kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k42 grants · $874k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARCH FOR MOMS ASSOCIATION$50,000
GROUNDSWELL FUND$45,000
TRI-VALLEY HAVEN FOR WOMEN$37,500
MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA$37,500
YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY$37,500
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS$37,500
COMMUNITY VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS$30,000
VERITY- COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION$30,000
MONTEREY COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER$30,000
BLACK MAMAS MATTER ALLIANCE INC$30,000
ULTRAVIOLET EDUCATION FUND$30,000
PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS$30,000
SAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE$30,000
ALTERISTIC$30,000
A CALL TO MEN THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MEN COMMITTED TO ENDING VIOLENCE$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEWS: $60k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $75k → 13%SISTER SONG INC: $30k → 13%NEWS: $46k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $56k → 13%SISTERSONG INC: $30k → 13%NEWS: $40k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $50k → 13%FREEFROM: $30k → 14%SISTER SONG INC: $30k → 13%NEWS: $40k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $50k → 13%NEWS: $40k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $50k → 13%NEWS: $40k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $50k → 13%NEWS: $30k → 9%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $50k → 13%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%MONARCH SERVICES- SERVICIOS MONARCA: $38k → 13%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS INC: $45k → 10%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS INC (SAVE): $35k → 10%SAFE ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS INC: $30k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $53k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $40k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $35k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $35k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $35k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $35k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $60k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $55k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $50k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $50k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $50k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $50k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $60k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $45k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $45k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $40k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $40k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $40k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $40k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $40k → 10%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $40k → 8%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $40k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $40k → 10%YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $38k → 8%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $40k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
NY
MA
OR
OH
RI
CA
UT
VA
KS
TN
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 95 repeat orgs$634k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

95 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
51

Total granted

$12M
$634k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+39%

Still filing today

91%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $600k · revenue +170%
  • MONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $419k · revenue +137%
  • Tri-Valley Haven For Women
    8× · 2017–2024 · $409k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $70k
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY DBA YWCA OF SILICON V
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • MM
    MAYDAY MEDICINES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
4
Center for Domestic Peace

We are Marin's champion in the movement to end domestic violence - working at the intersection of survivors, systems, and community.

Human Services
5
Alliance for Safety and Justice

Just safe's mission is to educate the public about the needs of communities most impacted by crime, violence, and incarceration; and promote new safety solutions through community-building, leadership development, grassroots mobilization,…

Crime & Legal
6
Planned Parenthood California Central Coast

To improve our communities' sexual and reproductive health outcomes through health care, education, and advocacy.

Health
7
SafeQuest Solano Inc

SafeQuest Solano is dedicated to providing prevention education, advo cacy, and intervention services to those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault.

—
8
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
9
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
10
Women's Foundation of California

Women's foundation of california amplifies the voices and experiences of community leaders, redistributes knowledge, power, and resources, and mobilizes communities and funders to advance justice for all.

—
11
Haven Inc

To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence

Crime & Legal
12
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is DREAMS33 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsFood Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Senior Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr13%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%47%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/122
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,856

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
115/118
Grantees still filing
87/118
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS — $599,850 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND IN…Tri-Valley Haven For Women — $408,600 · OtherTri-Valley Haven For WomenVERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION — $331,950 · OtherVERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CO…Monterey County Rape Crisis Center — $331,550 · OtherMonterey County Rape Crisis CenterSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE — $330,950 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPECORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $295,000 · OtherPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $237,500 · OtherBAY AREA WOMEN AGAINST RAPE — $190,200 · OtherRUBY'S PLACE INC — $295,000 · Other+72 more — $2,632,125 · Other+72 moreMONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA — $419,200 · Human ServicesMONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS …YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY — $358,950 · Human ServicesYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VA…FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $305,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTHNEWS — $296,000 · Human ServicesNEWSNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $295,000 · Human ServicesNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOME…BEYOND EMANCIPATION — $265,000 · Human ServicesBEYOND EMANCIPATIONMAITRI — $225,000 · Human ServicesMAITRISafe Alternatives To Violent Environments — $217,500 · Human ServicesSafe Alternatives To Violen…THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $190,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN…WALNUT AVENUE FAMILY & WOMENS CENTER — $147,500 · Human ServicesFreefrom — $135,000 · Human Services+12 more — $353,250 · Human Services+12 moreCommunity Violence Solutions — $331,450 · HealthCommunity Violenc…Rape Trauma Services — $330,700 · HealthRape Trauma Servi…Alteristic Inc — $320,000 · HealthAlteristic IncTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $305,000 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERICA…MARCH FOR MOMS ASSOCIATION — $275,000 · HealthMARCH FOR MOMS AS…Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) — $220,000 · HealthRape Abuse & Ince…Black Mamas Matter Alliance Inc — $80,000 · Health+14 more — $249,100 · Health+14 moreTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $410,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell Fund — $332,500 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $170,000 · PhilanthropyFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $42,500 · Philanthropy+3 more — $40,500 · PhilanthropySTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE — $295,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $66,500 · Crime & LegalJUST DETENTION INTERNATIONAL — $53,625 · Crime & LegalTHE WAGE JUSTICE CENTER — $22,500 · Crime & LegalENNEAGRAM PRISON PROJECT — $21,500 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $20,000 · Crime & LegalUltraViolet Education Fund — $202,500 · Civil RightsNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $90,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $85,500 · Civil RightsTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER — $85,000 · Civil RightsTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC — $320,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC — $29,750 · Arts & CultureENTERTAINMENT 2 AFFECT CHANGE — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,652,725Human Services$3,207,400Health$2,111,250Philanthropy$995,500Crime & Legal$479,125Civil Rights$463,000Arts & Culture$384,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS — $599,850 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA — $419,200 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $410,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTri-Valley Haven For Women — $408,600 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY — $358,950 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGroundswell Fund — $332,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetVERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION — $331,950 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetMonterey County Rape Crisis Center — $331,550 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetCommunity Violence Solutions — $331,450 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE — $330,950 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetRape Trauma Services — $330,700 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC — $320,000 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetAlteristic Inc — $320,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $305,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $305,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNEWS — $296,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $295,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetRUBY'S PLACE INC — $295,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $295,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSTAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE — $295,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetMARCH FOR MOMS ASSOCIATION — $275,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetBEYOND EMANCIPATION — $265,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $237,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMAITRI — $225,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) — $220,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSafe Alternatives To Violent Environments — $217,500 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetUltraViolet Education Fund — $202,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetBAY AREA WOMEN AGAINST RAPE — $190,200 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $190,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCALIFORNIANS FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MIDWIFERY — $180,000 over 8y, 75% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $170,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL — $158,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetWALNUT AVENUE FAMILY & WOMENS CENTER — $147,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetNetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children — $145,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFreefrom — $135,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $133,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJohn Burton Advocates for Youth — $126,750 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST — $123,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERSONG INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $85,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER — $85,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON ASSOCIATION INC — $82,500 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST — $82,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBlack Mamas Matter Alliance Inc — $80,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCCOF FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $71,125 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Tri-Valley Haven For Women ↗
  • Who funds YWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell Fund ↗
  • Who funds VERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Monterey County Rape Crisis Center ↗
  • Who funds Community Violence Solutions ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO WOMEN AGAINST RAPE ↗
  • Who funds Rape Trauma Services ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Alteristic Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWS ↗
  • Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse ↗
  • Who funds RUBY'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds STAND FOR FAMILIES FREE OF VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds MARCH FOR MOMS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND EMANCIPATION ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds MAITRI ↗
  • Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
  • Who funds Safe Alternatives To Violent Environments ↗
  • Who funds UltraViolet Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA WOMEN AGAINST RAPE ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIANS FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MIDWIFERY ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds WALNUT AVENUE FAMILY & WOMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
  • Who funds Freefrom ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds John Burton Advocates for Youth ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Women's Foundation of…California Physicians…The David and Lucile …East Bay Community Fo…The Sobrato Family Fo…The San Francisco Fou…Sunlight GivingUnited Way of the Bay…Jewish Community Fede…Silicon Valley Commun…Marin Community Found…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA52.6× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Women's Foundation of California · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Sunlight Giving · United Way of the Bay Area · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pinpoint Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Postpartum Support International — 43% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 148 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines