Skip to content

Montana · Nonprofit

BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE

BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE (Montana) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $307,322 to it, the largest being RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($109,730). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 64% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$215k
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$307k
Net assets
$317k
9/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What Beartooth Humane Alliance does

Mission

Companion animal welfare

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Beartooth Humane Alliance is carbon and stillwater counties (montana) only source of animal welfare. We are dedicated to and focused on our missions of controlling companion animal overpopulation, helping homeless cats and dogs find new families to love and care for them, teaching area youth and adults respect and responsibility for all animals, feeding hungry pets, and helping citizens reunite with their lost pets.

    $163,750 spent
    85% of program spending
  2. Operation nip and tuck is an ongoing project that provides free spay/neuter services to barn cats or other unsupervised outdoor cat populations in carbon and stillwater counties. During 2024, 305 cats were cared for through the program.

    $15,074 spent$3,328 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  3. Low cost spay/neuter vouchers for cats and dogs in carbon and stillwater counties. The program provided assistance for 24 dogs and 144 cats during 2024.

    $9,726 spent$5,203 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  4. Pet (animal) education programs in local schools. During 2024, 26 presentations wereconducted in area schools. The education programs were attended by 424 schools kids.

    $2,888 spent
    2% of program spending
  5. Distribution of pet food to all food banks in area. Also maintain a "hay bank" of emergency care situations of horses. Pet food is also distributed through the family service food deliveries in the area.

    $1,052 spent
    1% of program spending
  6. Animal adoption- homeless cats and dogs are provided temporary care in a foster home until a permanent home is found. Approximately 272 animals were rehomed during 2024.

    $15,156 earned by the program

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $192,490.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($111k) Expenses 100 ($89k) Net assets 100 ($229k)2018 Revenue 75 ($82k) Expenses 96 ($86k) Net assets 98 ($225k)2019 Revenue 98 ($109k) Expenses 112 ($100k) Net assets 102 ($234k)2020 Revenue 166 ($183k) Expenses 124 ($111k) Net assets 134 ($306k)2021 Revenue 128 ($141k) Expenses 141 ($126k) Net assets 140 ($321k)2022 Revenue 136 ($151k) Expenses 182 ($163k) Net assets 135 ($309k)2023 Revenue 146 ($162k) Expenses 194 ($173k) Net assets 130 ($297k)2024 Revenue 195 ($215k) Expenses 220 ($196k) Net assets 138 ($317k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (195)Expenses (220)Net assets (138)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $258k to $309k (+19%).

$231k
$227k
$258k
$309k
$324k
$310k
$299k
$318k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

83% of BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,065 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$21k
’17
−$4k
’18
$9k
’19
$72k
’20
$15k
’21
−$12k
’22
−$12k
’23
$19k
’24
20
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed55555555
Joined·+0+2+0+0+0+1+0
No longer listed·0200010
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $33k → $45k.

3 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 64% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 36% of grant income and the top three 87%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

64% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE.

36%
largest funder
87%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 62% · 2018 34% · 2019 55% · 2020 44% · 2021 98% · 2022 66% · 2023 44% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 69% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

64% of BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $110k that is directly attributable, 78% of it comes from funders outside Montana, across 7 states.

WA
MT
CO
TN
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Montana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $197k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 6,443 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Months of reserve19.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,443 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

94%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE?
BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE (Montana) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $307,322 to it, the largest being RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($109,730). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 64% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $307,322 in grants to BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE?
RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $109,730 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BEARTOOTH HUMANE ALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Beartooth Humane Alliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing