Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Panorama Global

PANORAMA GLOBAL works on a range of issues affecting the planet, people and producivity.

$24M
Granted FY2024still arriving
109
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$14MPublic Benefit$11MPhilanthropy$6.7MEducation$3.6MCommunity Improvement$3.4MInternational$3.3MCivil Rights$3.2MArts & Culture$3.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 109 grants below total $19,461,645 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $23,751,559 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,289,914 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k51 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $3.4M
  • $250k+19 grants · $15M
$50,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOISY CREEK (FUND FOR ALTERNATIVE JOURNALISM)$2,665,356
RUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND (MODEL C)$1,827,703
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$1,342,576
NEXT STREET FINANCIAL$1,092,218
KING COUNTY REGIONAL HOMELESSNESS AUTHORITY$995,042
THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$973,860
PANDEMIC RESPONSE ORGANIZATION (PRO PROMOTING HEALTHIER LIVES FOR ALL)$970,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (IRVING MEDICAL CENTER)$759,000
UNLOCK AID COALITION (MODEL C)$665,000
CLIMATE ACTION FOR SMALLHOLDERS (CASH) COALITION$537,806
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY$500,000
ACE RESOURCE NETWORK INC$470,000
IMPACTASSETS INC$403,000
JUMPSTART INC$403,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$360,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Aliento Education Fund: $100k → 11%NEWARK ANTI VIOLENCE COALITION: $27k → 17%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $23k → 12%HEALING URBAN BARRIOS: $28k → 14%TWO FEATHERS NATIVE AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 18%IA Co Agnst Dmstic Violence: $25k → 10%LATINAS REPRESENT (MOORE IMPACT): $100k → 12%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $78k → 16%EX-CONS FOR COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL CHANGE: $29k → 14%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI: $75k → 23%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY: $500k → 11%SACRED PURPOSES (IAMLEGACY): $23k → 14%LEAD4LIFE INC: $65k → 6%LEAD4LIFE INC: $65k → 8%COMMUNITY AMBASSADORS INITIATIVE: $25k → 14%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS: $5k → 12%TransFamily Support Services: $50k → 11%DRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON: $250k → 16%Chldrns Center of Wayne Cnty: $100k → 21%LATINAS REPRESENT (MOORE IMPACT): $75k → 12%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $78k → 16%Youth Outreach Services: $100k → 14%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI: $25k → 23%COMMUNITY AMBASSADORS INITIATIVE: $5k → 14%TRANSFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $50k → 11%SHE SHOULD RUN: $145k → 14%CHRIS 180: $100k → 14%TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI: $50k → 23%TRANSFAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $35k → 11%CHRIS 180: $23k → 14%She Should Run: $100k → 14%CHRIS 180: $5k → 14%KHMER COMMUNITY OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY: $23k → 9%COMMUNITY MEDIATION PROGRAM: $33k → 19%AYADA LEADS: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY MEDIATION PROGRAM: $5k → 19%TIDES CENTER (WOMEN & JUSTICE PROJECT): $33k → 10%SHE SHOULD RUN: $75k → 14%EMERGE ACTION FUND: $19k → 10%Los Angeles Youth Network: $100k → 14%GIRLS WHO CODE (MOMS FIRST): $205k → 17%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $8k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $8k → 9%WOMEN TOGETHER GLOBAL: $30k → 17%SOMALI HEALTH BOARD (V): $30k → 9%RENEGADES FOR LIFE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $4.1M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$2.8M · 68% · 27 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT FUND · HEALTH PROGRAMMING · ADVOCACY SUPPORT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$538k · 13% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · TRANSFER OF FISCAL SPONSORSHIP · HEALTH PROGRAMMING

South Asia$310k · 8% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: HEALTH PROGRAMMING · GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · PROJECT FUND

Middle East and North Africa$217k · 5% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: HEALTH PROGRAMMING · CONFERENCE SUPPORT

South America$174k · 4% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: PROJECT FUND · HEALTH PROGRAMMING

East Asia and the Pacific$44k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HEALTH PROGRAMMING

Russia and Neighboring States$40k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: HEALTH PROGRAMMING

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30M · 81 repeat orgs$22M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

81 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 77 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
111

Total granted

$30M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

91%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LIVING GOODS
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2.8M · revenue +59%
  • LM
    LAST MILE HEALTH
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +4%
  • VR
    VOTE RUN LEAD INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $2.2M · revenue +154% · 79% of their budget

Funded once

  • HA
    Health Access Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue -98%
  • TC
    The Commons Project Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $722k · revenue +43% · 32% of their budget
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $600k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
2
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
3
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
4
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
5
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
UltraViolet Action

Ultraviolet action (uva) is a 501c4 organization. ultraviolet action is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives feminist…

Public Benefit
8
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
9
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
10
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
11
Onyx Impact Inc

Onyx Impact is a nonprofit research, education, and digital innovation hub dedicated to building healthier, safer, and more just digital spaces for Black communities. We fight the spread of harmful information, amplify Black voices, and…

Civil Rights
12
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Access to Doorways Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentFood Banks and PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Addiction Recovery ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%11%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%41%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%3/282
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,283

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

253 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 253 of the 282 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
50
Early backer (in before they grew)
248/253
Grantees still filing
128/253
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAST MILE HEALTH — $2,618,633 · HealthLAST MILE HEALTHTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $1,073,860 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HO…Health Access Fund — $1,045,000 · HealthHealth Access FundThe Commons Project Foundation — $721,800 · HealthThe Commons Projec…YOUTHCAST MEDIA GROUP INC — $500,000 · HealthYOUTHCAST MEDIA GR…Active Minds Inc — $495,300 · HealthActive Minds IncPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION — $456,000 · Health+25 more — $2,187,490 · Health+25 moreNOISY CREEK (FUND FOR ALTERNATIVE JOURNALISM) — $2,665,356 · OtherNOISY CREEK (FUND FOR ALTERNATIVE JOU…NEXT STREET FINANCIAL LLC — $1,641,218 · OtherNEXT STREET FINANCIAL LLCKING COUNTY REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY — $995,042 · OtherKING COUNTY REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORIT…PANDEMIC RESPONSE ORGANIZATION INC — $1,067,000 · OtherPANDEMIC RESPONSE ORGANIZATION INC+105 more — $11,994,971 · Other+105 moreLIVING GOODS — $2,798,000 · InternationalLIVING GOODSUNLOCK AID COALITION — $1,455,875 · InternationalUNLOCK AID C…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $600,000 · InternationalUNITED STATE…AVINA AMERICAS INC — $364,471 · InternationalAVINA AMERIC…ARROW — $238,400 · International+7 more — $680,638 · International+7 moreNEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC — $2,100,000 · EducationNEW AMERICAN…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $759,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $513,259 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL…THE AAKOMA PROJECT INC — $500,000 · EducationTHE AAKOMA P…THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $489,286 · EducationTHE UNIVERSI…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $380,490 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $273,333 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $250,000 · EducationIGNITE — $225,000 · Education+6 more — $620,313 · Education+6 moreIMPACTASSETSINC — $1,816,218 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASSET…ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,342,576 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER…HOPEWELL FUND — $853,006 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FU…IMPACT CHARITABLE — $603,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT CHAR…ACE RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $470,000 · PhilanthropyACE RESOURC…TIDES FOUNDATION — $210,000 · PhilanthropyGroundswell Fund — $200,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $285,125 · PhilanthropyRUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND — $5,186,862 · Public BenefitRUN FOR SOM…+4 more — $311,500 · Public Benefit+4 moreVOTE RUN LEAD INC — $2,150,500 · Community ImprovementVOTE RUN L…JUMPSTART INC — $1,916,218 · Community ImprovementJUMPSTART …COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $300,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …COMMUNITY CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $206,148 · Community Improvement+13 more — $562,332 · Community Improvement+13 more
Health$9,098,083Other$18,363,587International$6,137,384Education$6,110,681Philanthropy$5,779,925Public Benefit$5,498,362Community Improvement$5,135,198

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRUN FOR SOMETHING ACTION FUND — $5,186,862 over 3y, 35% of budgetLIVING GOODS — $2,798,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH — $2,618,633 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetVOTE RUN LEAD INC — $2,150,500 over 3y, 79% of budgetNEW AMERICAN LEADERS INC — $2,100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetJUMPSTART INC — $1,916,218 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $1,816,218 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNLOCK AID COALITION — $1,455,875 over 2y, 78% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,342,576 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $1,073,860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANDEMIC RESPONSE ORGANIZATION INC — $1,067,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetHealth Access Fund — $1,045,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $853,006 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $759,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Commons Project Foundation — $721,800 over 1y, 32% of budgetIMPACT CHARITABLE — $603,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetRunning Start — $600,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $600,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE ACTION FOR SMALLHOLDERS (CASH) COALITION INC — $537,806 over 1y, 45% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $513,259 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AAKOMA PROJECT INC — $500,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY — $500,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetActive Minds Inc — $495,300 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO EDUCATION INITIATIVE — $490,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE — $489,286 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetACE RESOURCE NETWORK INC — $470,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION — $456,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $380,490 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVINA AMERICAS INC — $364,471 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $360,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN — $320,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $312,501 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY MATTERS FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetHigher Heights Leadership Fund — $300,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $273,333 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON — $250,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S POLITICAL INITIATIVE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES — $239,385 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetARROW — $238,400 over 3y, 17% of budgetAmerican Values Coalition — $228,433 over 2y, 71% of budgetIGNITE — $225,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC — $220,001 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAsian Pacific Amer InstitCongressional — $220,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNewark Community Street Team Inc — $211,170 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $205,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ms Foundation for Wom…Wellspring Philanthro…Everytown for Gun Saf…Groundswell FundFoundation to Promote…Amalgamated Charitabl…Tides FoundationNew Venture FundTides Center128 Collective Founda…Tara Health FoundationNEO Philanthropy Inc
Ms Foundation for Women IncNY42.7× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Inc · Groundswell Fund · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Tides Center · 128 Collective Foundation · Tara Health Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Panorama Global funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Sanar Wellness Institute Inc — 80% of income from government
  • Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
  • The Childrens Home Society of New Jersey — 43% of income from government
  • Newark Community Street Team Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Fp YouthOutcry Foundation Inc Dba the Hubb Arts & Trauma Center — 29% of income from government
  • Impact Inc — 25% of income from government
  • Building Audacity — 24% of income from government
  • Community Mediation Program Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Doc Wayne Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Center for Hope Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 282 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines