How much did ONEOK FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$6.1MEducation$4.3MArts & Culture$2.7MHuman Services$1.1MAnimals$900kFood & Nutrition$408kYouth Development$298kRecreation & Sports$187kEnvironment$186kOther$6.9M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

emergency responseimpacted covidcovid pandemicfood impactedpurchaseipadskit

2021

emergency responderevictionhomelesswyoming'schildrenwomenreplacement

2022

pledgeemergency responderclientoasissteprescuedelivery

2023

emergency respondersidneycaremorrisvillagehousingchildren's

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 203 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k141 grants · $477k
$10k–50k39 grants · $839k
$50k–250k21 grants · $1.6M
$250k+2 grants · $750k

$4,877

Median grant

States reached

$28M

Total assets

Largest grants

Gilcrease Museum Management Trust$500,000
North Dakota National Guard Foundation$250,000
Mckenzie Co PS District 1$200,000
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc$200,000
City Of Mont Belvieu$150,000
Young Mens Christian Association Of Greater Tulsa$100,000
North Dakota Stockmens Foundation$100,000
Williston State College Foundation$75,000
Young Mens Christian Association Of Midland Texas$75,000
Watford City Parks & Recreation Foundation$60,000
Oklahoma State University Foundation$54,000
Williston Community Builders$50,000
Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Foundation$50,000
Habitat For Humanity International Inc$50,000
Gateway To Science Center Inc$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $834k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of ONEOK FOUNDATION INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 68% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

ONEOK FOUNDATION INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$19M · 187 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

187 repeat relationships — 86 still active in FY2024, 101 since wound down; 113 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

187

236

Total granted

$19M

$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%

+68%

Still filing today

45%

29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Tulsa Community Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $5.6M · revenue +81%
GM
Gilcrease Museum Management Trust
3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +80%
OS
Oklahoma State University Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +80%

Funded once

GREENWOOD RISING INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +23043%
ND
NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +217%
CO
CITY OF MONT BELVIEU-PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Central Oklahoma

Funding of college scholarships and support of university programs.

Education

Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation

Arts & Culture

Tulsa Bike Share Inc

Transforming our Tulsa community by providing a high quality, convenient, and affordable bicycle transit system that connects people to places where they live, work, and play.

Environment

Tulsa Firefighters Benevolence Fund

Provide relief to family members due to death, injury, or illness.

Philanthropy

Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To lend or grant needed funds to other nonprofits serving low-income individuals.

Housing & Shelter

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—

Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

Enhancing the image and appearance of Oklahoma City through education, programs and community engagement.

Environment

Tulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc

Entertains, educates, heals, and inspires through musical excellence, innovation, and collaboration.

Arts & Culture

Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc

To promote ethical conduct among attorneys, to advance the effective administration of our judicial system, to ensure equal access to justice for all citizens and to engender respect for the legal profession, the law and the governing…

Crime & Legal

Oklahoma Blood Institute

To be the donor to patient lifeline by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health

Oklahoma Baptist University

A Christian Liberal Arts University.

Education

Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Tulsa Inc and the most unlike its peers is North Dakota Natural Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%1/217

the rest of the field

11%

2,145/19,205

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

195 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

192/195

Grantees still filing

161/195

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$7,576,492Philanthropy$6,141,096Education$4,250,687Arts & Culture$2,679,000Human Services$1,106,750Animals$900,000Food & Nutrition$407,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK110× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way · One Gas Foundation Inc · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ONEOK FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

74get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: North Dakota National Guard Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~66 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.3× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 450457332 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on North Dakota National Guard Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 66 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 63% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Oneok Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oneok Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ONEOK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

195 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Oneok Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

ONEOK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

195 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Oneok Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph