Loading…
Loading…
Oklahoma · Nonprofit
Joy in the Cause Company (Oklahoma) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,333,154 in grants to it, the largest being TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,225,825). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Joy in the Cause Company is better cushioned than half of the 2,433 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
88% of Joy in the Cause Company’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (78% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $14k → $155k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 96% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Joy in the Cause Company’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Joy in the Cause Company leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 96% · 2019 87% · 2020 89% · 2021 98% · 2022 97% · 2023 91% · 2024 97% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Joy in the Cause Company is locally rooted: 96% of its grant income comes from Oklahoma funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 296 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
82% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing