Skip to content
Oneok Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Oneok Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
204
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.0MEducation$5.8MArts & Culture$2.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MHuman Services$984kAnimals$901kRecreation & Sports$793kFood & Nutrition$689kOther$0
02FY2024 · 204 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k141 grants · $477k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $854k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$4,909
Median grant
16
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gilcrease Museum Management Trust$500,000
North Dakota National Guard Foundation$250,000
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc$200,000
Mckenzie Co PS District 1$200,000
City Of Mont Belvieu$150,000
Young Mens Christian Association Of Greater Tulsa$100,000
North Dakota Stockmens Foundation$100,000
Young Mens Christian Association Of Midland Texas$75,000
Williston State College Foundation$75,000
Watford City Parks & Recreation Foundation$60,000
Oklahoma State University Foundation$54,000
Habitat For Humanity International Inc$50,000
Williston Coyote Foundation A North Dakota Corpora$50,000
A New Leaf Inc$50,000
Williston Community Builders$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $5k → 8%FLOURISH HOMES INC: $5k → 9%OKLAHOMA WARRIORS HONOR FLIGHT: $4k → 18%Young Mens Christian Association Of Midland Texas: $75k → 12%HILL TOP HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%Center Of Family Love: $10k → 9%WEATHERFORD FOOD & RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%JOHN 316 MISSION: $5k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $5k → 14%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%BENEFIT FUND OF MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS: $75k → 9%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $4k → 14%Neighbors Along The Line: $4k → 14%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%American Indian Cultural Center Foundation: $40k → 16%Young Mens Christian Association Of Greater Tulsa: $100k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $50k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $50k → 15%Crossover Community Impact Incorporated: $50k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $50k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $50k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $25k → 15%Community Action Project Of Tulsa County Inc: $4k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%Youth Services Of Tulsa Inc: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $10k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $5k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $50k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $50k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $25k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $15k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $50k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $50k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $25k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER TULSA: $25k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $25k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $25k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $25k → 15%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $25k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICE COUNCIL: $15k → 15%MODUS: $5k → 15%MODUS: $5k → 15%Modus Inc: $5k → 15%The Arc Of Oklahoma Inc: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
CA
CO
NE
NM
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Oneok Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 68%.

Oneok Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 184 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

184 repeat relationships: 92 still active in FY2024, 92 since wound down; 105 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

184
232

Total granted

$13M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+19%

Still filing today

52%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterHealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +63%
  • The University of Tulsa
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +16%
  • TZ
    TULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $800k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • GREENWOOD RISING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +688%
  • AN
    AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CO
    CITY OF MONT BELVIEU-PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
4
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
5
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
6
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
8
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
9
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
10
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
11
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
12
Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is North Dakota Natural Resources Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

217 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 217 of the 526 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
50
Early backer (in before they grew)
214/217
Grantees still filing
130/217
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,624,421 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONNORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER PARKS FOUNDATION: $220,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $185,000 · PhilanthropyOklahoma State University Foundation: $1,095,000 · EducationOklahoma State Universi…The University of Tulsa: $1,086,000 · EducationThe University of TulsaUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $463,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA …LANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $392,500 · EducationLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOU…KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $312,500 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY…READING PARTNERS: $275,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS+19 more: $907,738 · Education+19 moreMCKENZIE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 1: $403,840 · OtherMCKENZIE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOO…O R U GOLDEN EAGLE CLUB INC: $325,000 · OtherO R U GOLDEN EAGLE CLUB INCCity Of Mont Belvieu: $300,000 · OtherCity Of Mont BelvieuA NEW LEAF INC: $250,000 · OtherMckenzie Co PS District 1: $200,000 · OtherWILLISTON COYOTE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $190,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY: $230,000 · Other+125 more: $3,421,386 · Other+125 moreTHE GILCREASE MUSEUM MANAGEMENT TRUST: $1,500,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GILCREASE…GREENWOOD RISING INC: $375,000 · Arts & CultureGREENWOOD RIS…TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA CHILDRE…GATEWAY TO SCIENCE CENTER INC: $210,000 · Arts & CultureGATEWAY TO SC…FRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF TH…TULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $126,500 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $390,000 · Human ServicesNorth Dakota National Guard Foundation: $250,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $250,000 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $160,000 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas: $75,000 · Human ServicesBenefit Fund of McKenzie County Healthcare Systems: $75,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $50,000 · Human Services+7 more: $114,500 · Human ServicesTULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC: $800,000 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $100,000 · AnimalsGreat Plains Food Bank: $200,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $129,500 · Food & NutritionFARM RESCUE: $75,000 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move Inc: $50,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $45,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $39,500 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$6,279,421Education$4,531,738Other$5,520,226Arts & Culture$2,671,500Human Services$1,464,500Animals$900,000Food & Nutrition$539,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,624,421 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE GILCREASE MUSEUM MANAGEMENT TRUST: $1,500,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $1,095,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $1,086,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC: $800,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $463,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLANGSTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $392,500 over 5y, 15% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $390,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGREENWOOD RISING INC: $375,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetO R U GOLDEN EAGLE CLUB INC: $325,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $312,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $275,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNorth Dakota National Guard Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $250,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY: $230,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetRIVER PARKS FOUNDATION: $220,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $210,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetGATEWAY TO SCIENCE CENTER INC: $210,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWILLISTON COYOTE FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $129,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MET INC: $129,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $120,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetBismarck State College Foundation: $115,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetRogers State University Foundation: $100,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetWILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $100,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHEODORE ROOSEVELT PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Midland Texas: $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFARM RESCUE: $75,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetWILLISTON STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBenefit Fund of McKenzie County Healthcare Systems: $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWATFORD CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY CARE: $60,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetARTS ALLIANCE TULSA INC: $55,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $51,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…The Hardesty Family F…George Kaiser Family …The Gelvin FoundationThe Sharna and Irvin …Grace & Franklin Bern…Ralph and Frances McG…Mervin Bovaird Founda…Tulsa Community Found…Flint Family Foundati…One Gas Foundation IncSanford P & Irene F B…
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK137.3× affinity75 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oneok Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oneok Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 560%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Community Market of Pott Count: 57% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc: 37% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Rogers State University Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oral Roberts University: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
56get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oneok Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oneok Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 526 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oneok’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home