· Private foundation
Metta Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RICHMOND NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER | $165,000 |
| THE SCAN FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR SERVICES | $112,500 |
| YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO | $100,000 |
| US4US BAYAREA | $100,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO SENIOR AND DISABILITY ACTION | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY LIVING CAMPAIGN | $100,000 |
| SAMOAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $100,000 |
| COALITION OF AGENCIES SERVING THE ELDERLY | $100,000 |
| FELTON INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| OPENHOUSE | $100,000 |
| YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY TECH NETWORK | $100,000 |
| PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER | $100,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
76 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $347k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO7× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +40%
- CLCommunity Living Campaign8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +270%
- HIHOMEBRIDGE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $843k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- CICollective Impactone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -42%
- RDRICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +185%
- MUMUJURES UNITAS Y ACTIVASone grant, 2021 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.
The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…
SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…
We empower individuals, families, and seniors to achieve wellness, stability, and independence through culturally-competent care.
The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.
To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Renaissance Parents of Success. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds Community Living Campaign ↗
- Who funds HOMEBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds KIMOCHI INC ↗
- Who funds Bayview Hunters Point Multipurpose Senior Services Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SCAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CURRY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds SHANTI PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Openhouse ↗
- Who funds Felton Institute ↗
- Who funds CARA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Tech Network ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Senior and Disability Action DBA Senior & Disability Action ↗
- Who funds Mujeres Unidas y Activas ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE IN AGING ↗
- Who funds Walk San Francisco Foundation ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
- Who funds BAYVIEW FUTURES FKA CENTER FOR YOUTH WELLNESS ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO INTERFAITH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE ON AGING ↗
- Who funds ON LOK DAY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Covia Foundation ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSION LANGUAGE AND VOCATIONAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
- Who funds Support for Families of Children with Disabilities ↗
- Who funds SAMOAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds Rafiki Coalition For Health and Wellness ↗
- Who funds REAL OPTIONS FOR CITY KIDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Bothin Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The James Irvine Foundation · Tipping Point Community · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Metta Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Metta Fund?
Find your warmest path to Metta Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.