California · Nonprofit
Community Living Campaign
Community Living Campaign (California) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,832,107 to it, the largest being METTA FUND ($1,165,050). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $3.8M
- Funders on record
- 21
- Grants received
- $2.8M
- Net assets
- $631k
What Community Living Campaign does
Mission
The Community Living Campaign uses the power of relationships to reduce isolation and to eliminate barriers to aging in community. We do this by strengthening networks of support for individuals and across neighborhoods - networks that promote acts of kindness and a spirit of justice. We teach people how technology and social media are new tools to help individuals and organizations better reach their goals.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Neighborhood Networks Community Connectors have organized neighbors in the Bayview, Cayuga, Merced Extension Triangle, Miraloma Park, Inner Sunset, OMI (Ocean View-Merced Heights-Ingleside), Parkmerced, Sunnyside, Midtown Terrace, Crocker Amazon, Potrero Hill, Other Sunset (via Senior Power) and St. Francis Square/Western Addition neighborhoods. These networks reweave communities of support focusing on food delivery, home repairs, healthy aging, breast cancer support, advocacy, social activities, and access to transportation services. Working together with hundreds of neighborhood volunteers and the support of numerous community partners this year, we helped create connections for thousands of San Francisco neighbors.Neighborhood Networks. Every neighborhood finds its own mix of activities and interests to bring people together and build caring communities. In the past year, we coordinated community-building activities such as senior exercise classes, walking groups, and community forums. Neighbors also helped each other with countless little tasks, pitching in where needed. Connector network participants feel healthier and more connected: 95% of participants know one or more…
$1,402,242 spent39% of program spendingComputer Training, Access and Tech Support Digital Literacy and Internet Access. CLC is a leader in helping seniors use technology and social media. Through the City's SF Connected program, we offer free workshops and drop-in computer tutoring at local senior and community centers. These classes create friendships and help our neighbors connect with friends and family, as well as healthcare, financial, government, and other information that is rapidly moving online. Through our partnership with Urban Equity Group, we also provides free tech support to qualifying local residents throughout San Francisco.In the past year, our Trainers and volunteers provided thousansds of hours of computer training to hundredsd of low-income seniors and people with disabilities. Together with the Department of Aging and Adult Services and other community agencies, we are narrowing the digital divide.We also provide staff support and leadership to the San Francisco Tech Council, which is a multi-stakeholder group looking at ways to bridge the digital divide for older adults and adults with disabilities. Recently, we have added more focus to the intersection of employment and technology.We bring…
$1,033,633 spent29% of program spendingSenior & Disability Employment and EmpowermentSF ReServe Employment: CLCs newest initiative adapts ReServe, a national program that matches seniors and adults with disabilities (ReServists) with paid service opportunities in their community. ReServists secure meaningful, part-time work while providing significant help to local non-profits, schools, businesses, and the communities they serve. Our staff assist potential ReServists with applications, developing a resume, and defining interests to facilitate a great match.In past year, over a hundred people completed applications and sixty-five ReServists were placed at community organizations. To date, the program has paid for approximately 55,000 hours of ReServist expertise at CLC and over 20 Partner organizations.In the past, we empowered hundreds of participants through Empowered Elder trainings, including several in Spanish. 99% of participants reported that they are better informed and more able to advocate for themselves and others. 81% feel more engaged in their community.
$1,030,554 spent29% of program spendingOutreach, Coalitions & OtherWe work in coalitions to forge solutions to the large and complex challenges of creating an inclusive San Francisco where people of all ages and abilities can truly live in community. Together, we make sure the voices of seniors and adults with disabilities are heard loud and clear. We build the power of community voices to shape decisions being made by our elected officials and agencies.We helped organize the Dignity Fund Coalition, which garnered over 110 endorsements to pass a first-in-the-nation ballot measure in 2016. The Dignity Fund increases annual funding or essential community-based services and supports for San Francisco seniors and adults with disabilities for the next 20 years. For too long, funding for essential services and supports for San Francisco older adults and people with disabilities has been a yearly battle, with good years and devastating years, depending on the City budget. Were now working to support enhanced planning and accountability in support of equity, choice, independence, and dignity.Francis Goldsmith Vision & Hearing Initiative. To counter the isolating effects of hearing and vision loss, CLC includes best…
$135,996 spentof which $50,000 as grants4% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,602,425.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $477k to $828k (+74%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 59% · 2018 70% · 2019 78% · 2020 76% · 2021 77% · 2022 78% · 2023 80% · 2024 82% · 2025 83%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of Community Living Campaign’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $335k → $551k.
6 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 35% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Community Living Campaign’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Community Living Campaign leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Community Living Campaign.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 69% · 2018 71% · 2019 48% · 2020 64% · 2021 37% · 2022 53% · 2023 55% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of Community Living Campaign's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
99% of Community Living Campaign's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $992k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
Community Living Campaign has grown faster than half of the 431 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 431 civil rights nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Organizations like Community Living Campaign
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
91% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Community Living Campaign: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Community Living Campaign?
- Community Living Campaign (California) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,832,107 to it, the largest being METTA FUND ($1,165,050). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Community Living Campaign have?
- IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $2,832,107 in grants to Community Living Campaign, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Community Living Campaign?
- METTA FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,165,050 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Community Living Campaign find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing