Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leo Model Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
144
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$2.4MEnvironment$2.0MInternational$2.0MFood & Nutrition$1.3MArts & Culture$1.2MHuman Services$1.0MAnimals$952kCivil Rights$838kOther$0
02FY2024 · 144 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k63 grants · $252k
  • $10k–50k66 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY (PHS)$125,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$90,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$80,000
LCV (LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS)$80,000
STATE VOICES$80,000
WOMEN'S WAY$80,000
JERUSALEM FOUNDATION$80,000
CITY HARVEST$75,000
OBERLIN COLLEGE$65,000
HOPEWELL FUND (VOTE FORWARD)$60,000
TURNOUT ACTIVISM$60,000
HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE$50,000
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$50,000
RARE CENTER FOR TROPICAL CONSERVATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $916k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW ENGLAND VILLAGE: $1k → 8%PATHWAYS HOUSING FIRST INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CHILDREN FIRST PA: $40k → 22%CHILDREN FIRST PA: $40k → 22%PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $20k → 22%PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $20k → 22%FAMILIES FORWARD PHILADELPHIA: $15k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $80k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $51k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $41k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $40k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $31k → 22%WOMEN'S WAY: $26k → 22%THE BLUE CARD: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $5k → 17%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 22%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 22%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $3k → 22%RIGHTS BEHIND BARS: $13k → 14%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $35k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 22%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 22%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $30k → 22%RIGHTS BEHIND BARS: $15k → 14%RIGHTS BEHIND BARS: $13k → 14%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $30k → 22%PEOPLE EMERGENCY CENTER (PEC): $15k → 22%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $37k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $27k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $23k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DE
KS
NC
SC
DC
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Leo Model Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Leo Model Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 166 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

166 repeat relationships — 124 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

166
81

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

72%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CITY HARVEST INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $562k · revenue +52%
  • JF
    JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $510k · revenue +69%
  • TP
    THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $436k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • P
    PHS
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • RI
    RECIDIVIZ INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -100%
  • PI
    PENNENVIRONMENT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations and the most unlike its peers is Recidiviz Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Elementary Literacy TutoringDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsDevelopmental Disabilities …Local History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local Food System Organizat…Community College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Public Library OperationsDance Arts OrganizationsJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%37%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/188
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,377

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

184 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 184 of the 267 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
182/184
Grantees still filing
143/184
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL — $378,525 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOLNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY — $355,875 · OtherECOHEALTH ALLIANCE (WILDLIFE TRUST) — $351,500 · OtherRARE CENTER FOR TROPICAL CONSERVATION — $325,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $302,000 · OtherTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $280,000 · Other+99 more — $4,872,595 · Other+99 moreJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $510,000 · InternationalJERUSALEM FOUNDAT…HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $345,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRS…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $285,460 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATC…NEW ISRAEL FUND — $255,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $221,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $180,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONC…J STREET — $107,000 · InternationalHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $95,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $85,000 · International+6 more — $156,000 · International+6 moreHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $225,000 · EducationHAMPSHIRE CO…MIDDLESEX SCHOOL — $191,750 · EducationMIDDLESEX SC…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $160,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO…Oberlin College — $91,000 · EducationOberlin Coll…WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $81,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $80,000 · EducationREAD ALLIANCE INC — $70,000 · EducationNATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS FOUNDATION — $60,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $60,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $60,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $60,000 · EducationTHE NIGHTINGALE-BAMFORD SCHOOL — $60,000 · Education+14 more — $365,500 · Education+14 moreTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $435,800 · EnvironmentTHE PENNS…NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $195,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK …NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $127,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL R…Willistown Conservation Trust Inc — $65,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $61,500 · EnvironmentPENNENVIRONMENT RESEARCH & POLICY CENTER INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentISLAND CONSERVATION — $60,000 · EnvironmentNEIGHBORHOOD GARDENS TRUST — $45,000 · Environment+4 more — $122,000 · Environment+4 moreWOMENS WAY — $269,000 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $182,000 · Human ServicesChildren First PA — $140,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $95,000 · Human ServicesEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania — $70,000 · Human ServicesRIGHTS BEHIND BARS INC — $41,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY — $40,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN AGAINST ABUSE INC — $38,000 · Human Services+5 more — $74,960 · Human ServicesFILM FORUM INC — $198,500 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $163,500 · Arts & CultureFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $69,000 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $55,000 · Arts & CultureBALLETX — $45,700 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC — $45,400 · Arts & CultureWNET — $42,000 · Arts & Culture+17 more — $258,000 · Arts & CultureCITY HARVEST INC — $562,000 · Food & NutritionMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $75,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance — $27,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$6,865,495International$2,239,460Education$1,564,250Environment$1,231,300Human Services$989,960Arts & Culture$877,100Food & Nutrition$664,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $562,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $510,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $435,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $345,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $285,460 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $280,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS WAY — $269,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $255,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA — $228,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $225,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy — $225,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $221,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFILM FORUM INC — $198,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $195,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMIDDLESEX SCHOOL — $191,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $182,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $180,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $170,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $163,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRECIDIVIZ INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $142,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren First PA — $140,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $127,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL — $109,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetJ STREET — $107,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetRECIDIVIZ INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA — $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $95,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College — $91,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $85,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC — $81,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE VOICES — $80,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPENNENVIRONMENT INC — $75,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE — $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services of The Diocese of Pennsylvania — $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetREAD ALLIANCE INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE — $69,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $69,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $61,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
  • Who funds WOMENS WAY
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds FILM FORUM INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX SCHOOL
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RECIDIVIZ INC
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Children First PA
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds J STREET
  • Who funds RECIDIVIZ INC
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA53.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · Independence Foundation · Claneil Foundation Inc · The Cigna Group Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Hamilton Family Foundation · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leo Model Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • New England Village Inc68% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center49% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc22% of income from government
  • Maryland Academy of Sciences9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Leo Model Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Leo Model Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 267 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph