Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION

SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $841,281 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($149,966). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$298k
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$841k
Net assets
$74k
8/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 77%
01What it does

What Samuel Lawrence Foundation does

Mission

The Samuel Lawrence Foundation strives to promote human interaction in communities by encouraging broader access to art, culture, science and medicine.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Environment and Science: Science is a crucial resource for evolving a sustainable futre. The intricacy of global challenges calls for new methods and innovative outlooks withing the scientific community. We advocate and aid these developments, focusing efforts on understanding and educating communities on the short and long term effects and risks of the San Onofre Power Plant and their plans for storage of nuclear waste.

    $54,658 spentof which $54,658 as grants$99,318 earned by the program
    23% of program spending
  2. Arts and Culture: Connections matter and the Samuel Lawrence Foundation Strives to connect communities to art and culture. We have sustained and amplified the work of several Southern California dance and ballet programs through our mini grants to deserving students. Our priority is to increase access to music and dance for families who otherwise would not have been exposed to the arts.

    $83,149 spentof which $83,149 as grants$23,750 earned by the program
    35% of program spending
  3. Education: Strengthening a sense of knowledge, skill and value is pertinent to any individual, regardless of age. We distinguish ourselves as a building block needed for advancing education of all sorts - whether it be bridging the gap between between San Diego Unified School District and access to live classical music, advocating for improved education of climate change, or providing budding scientists the funds needed to continue their education.

    $70,701 spentof which $70,701 as grants$23,750 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  4. Other

    $28,690 spentof which $28,440 as grants$20,000 earned by the program
    12% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $237,198.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($616k) Expenses 100 ($445k) Net assets 100 ($170k)2018 Revenue 54 ($330k) Expenses 92 ($409k) Net assets 54 ($91k)2019 Revenue 27 ($167k) Expenses 52 ($232k) Net assets 15 ($25k)2020 Revenue 36 ($222k) Expenses 28 ($127k) Net assets 71 ($121k)2021 Revenue 42 ($257k) Expenses 53 ($238k) Net assets 83 ($140k)2022 Revenue 38 ($233k) Expenses 55 ($247k) Net assets 75 ($126k)2023 Revenue 38 ($234k) Expenses 56 ($250k) Net assets 65 ($111k)2024 Revenue 48 ($298k) Expenses 75 ($335k) Net assets 44 ($74k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (48)Expenses (75)Net assets (44)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $31k to $121k (+295%).

$170k
$95k
$31k
$121k
$142k
$128k
$111k
$94k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$171k
’17
−$79k
’18
−$65k
’19
$96k
’20
$19k
’21
−$14k
’22
−$16k
’23
−$37k
’24
3.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed37886666
Joined·+4+2+2+0+1+0+0
No longer listed·0122100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $65k → $131k.

9 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $205k from one payer (the same organization on both sides, largest Samuel Lawrence Foundation). These are real filings, and they are not money SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION raised.

From the IRS filings of SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 18% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

55% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION.

18%
largest funder
43%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 62% · 2018 44% · 2019 40% · 2020 61% · 2021 18% · 2022 45% · 2023 53% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 33% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

52% of SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $402k that is directly attributable, 53% of it comes from funders outside California, across 7 states.

MI
NY
PA
CA
MD
DE
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $439k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION's revenue fell 52% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−12% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−10% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,936 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

71% of spending goes to programs.

Program 71%Management 8%Fundraising 21%

Governance

8
board members
88%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION?
SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $841,281 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($149,966). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $841,281 in grants to SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $149,966 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SAMUEL LAWRENCE FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing