Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION

GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION (Minnesota) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $40,472 to it, the largest being LEO MODEL FOUNDATION INC ($20,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$130k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$40k
Net assets
$259k
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%
01What it does

What Green Again Restoration does

Mission

To collaborate with the people of madagascar to develop & share robust scientific strategies for rainforest restoration & protection, in order to conserve the unique tropical biodiversity & support traditional livelihoods of rural people.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Direct reforestation including support of scientific studies designed and executed by University of MN & VA Tech. 17,866 trees were planted and 15,362 additional trees were supported throughout their 1st 3 years of growth by our extended care program. These funds need to support planting and at least 3 years of extended care.

    $64,631 spent$82,381 earned by the program
    62% of program spending
  2. Eco school and greenhouse facility support continued. The school educates Malagascy communities on planting and caring for trees in a manner that will allow them to survive hurricanes & wildfires. This is also the center of scientific research which will be shared with tree planting organizations around the world and educates residents in scientific processes and tools. The ultimate goal is to build capacity for sustainable forest management thru eco education and scientific study.

    $27,208 spent$27,066 earned by the program
    26% of program spending
  3. Cyclone repairs, Electric microgrid development, Clean water and sanitation support, Leadership training, community building, local decision making by Malagascy team captains, field station & educational development. The long term goal is that locals will be able to competently manage forest restoration and protection on their own.

    $11,473 spent$11,395 earned by the program
    11% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $1,003 spent
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $104,315.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($175k) Expenses 100 ($67k) Net assets 100 ($119k)2022 Revenue 81 ($141k) Expenses 164 ($110k) Net assets 126 ($149k)2023 Revenue 68 ($118k) Expenses 106 ($71k) Net assets 166 ($197k)2024 Revenue 66 ($115k) Expenses 114 ($76k) Net assets 198 ($236k)2025 Revenue 74 ($130k) Expenses 159 ($107k) Net assets 218 ($259k)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (74)Expenses (159)Net assets (218)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $150k to $198k (+32%).

$120k
$150k
$198k
$237k
$260k
20212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

93% of GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$108k
’21
$31k
’22
$47k
’23
$39k
’24
$23k
’25
3.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Catherine Sangotra Hill

Chief executive officer

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2024 and FY2025 filings.

20212022202320242025
Listed76777
Joined·+0+1+0+1
No longer listed·1001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $73 → $5k.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
3
3
2
1

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

26% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION.

49%
largest funder
99%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 66% · 2022 49% · 2023 98% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION draws 67% of its grant income from funders outside Minnesota, across 2 states in all.

MN
PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin18% · above the median
Months of reserve3.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−7% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION?
GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION (Minnesota) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $40,472 to it, the largest being LEO MODEL FOUNDATION INC ($20,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $40,472 in grants to GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION?
LEO MODEL FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GREEN AGAIN RESTORATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Green Again Restoration →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing