· Private foundation
Kohnstamm Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k98 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEW THOUGHT CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL LIVING | $22,200 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $11,000 |
| OHSU FOUNDATION | $7,250 |
| MORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $5,000 |
| LITERARY ARTS INC | $5,000 |
| PANDRILLUS FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| WILDERNESS PROGRAM | $3,500 |
| DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY | $3,500 |
| KIVA | $3,500 |
| OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING | $3,500 |
| KENYA KEYS | $2,550 |
| OPB CORNERSTONE SOCIETY | $2,500 |
| CHILDRENS INSTITUTE | $2,500 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $1,250 |
| CASA FOR CHILDREN INC | $1,050 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
99 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KKKENYA KEYS5× · 2020–2024 · $111k · revenue +21%
- NFNative Fish Society Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +89%
LITERARY ARTS INC3× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- MFMetropolitan Family Servicegraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +53%
- HOHARBOR OF HOPEone grant, 2020 · $1k
- HHHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERSone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Nedc's mission is to work toward a future in which the pacific northwest leads the nation in developing, implementing & enforcing strong laws and regulations that protect the environment & human health, and where our governments &…
Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center and the most unlike its peers is Wild Steelhead Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 203 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENYA KEYS ↗
- Who funds Native Fish Society Inc ↗
- Who funds LITERARY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Service ↗
- Who funds MORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds PANDRILLUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
- Who funds DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Columbia Gorge ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SOLVE ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TIMBERLINE ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
- Who funds JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kohnstamm Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Deschutes River Conservancy — 100% of income from government
- Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
- Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Deschutes Land Trust — 46% of income from government
- Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
- Mental Health Association of Oregon — 41% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
- Elevate Oregon — 28% of income from government
- Native Fish Society Inc — 27% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Literary Arts Inc — 10% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Open School Inc — 5% of income from government
- Together We Are Greater Than — 5% of income from government
- Solve — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
- PlayWrite Inc — 3% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Portland Symphonic Choir — 2% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Portland Center Stage — 1% of income from government
- Youth Music Project — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
- Childrens Center — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.