Texas · Nonprofit
RIVER CITY ADVOCACY
RIVER CITY ADVOCACY (Texas) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,177,299 to it, the largest being MCKENNA FOUNDATION ($844,803). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $519k
- Funders on record
- 11
- Grants received
- $1.2M
- Net assets
- $1.1M
What River City Advocacy does
Mission
Our mission is to provide peer based mental health recovery support systems needed in our communitity. Our vision is to advocate, educate and facilitate acceptance of mental health issues.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Program
Developed a set of goals to further our mission of helping consumers with mental illness and their families organize, advocate for themselves and others, support each other and reach a state of recovery so they may become productive members of society and the community.
$717,333 spent$63,633 earned by the program100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $717,333.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $133k to $692k (+420%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2018 69% · 2019 45% · 2020 2% · 2021 18% · 2024 77% · 2025 82%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
84% of RIVER CITY ADVOCACY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (82% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Amanda Hunt
Executive director
Board chair
Jerry Sauceda
Board chair
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $49k → $74k.
2 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of RIVER CITY ADVOCACY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
RIVER CITY ADVOCACY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
93% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RIVER CITY ADVOCACY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 89% · 2019 95% · 2020 80% · 2021 78% · 2022 57% · 2023 62% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
75% of RIVER CITY ADVOCACY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 45% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
100% of RIVER CITY ADVOCACY's grant income comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $27k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
RIVER CITY ADVOCACY has grown faster than half of the 7,883 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,883 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like RIVER CITY ADVOCACY
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
93% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RIVER CITY ADVOCACY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds RIVER CITY ADVOCACY?
- RIVER CITY ADVOCACY (Texas) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,177,299 to it, the largest being MCKENNA FOUNDATION ($844,803). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does RIVER CITY ADVOCACY have?
- IRS filings report 11 organizations giving $1,177,299 in grants to RIVER CITY ADVOCACY, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of RIVER CITY ADVOCACY?
- MCKENNA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $844,803 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like RIVER CITY ADVOCACY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds River City Advocacy →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing