· Private foundation
Goodwin Family Memorial Tua
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k120 grants · $630k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEEPING KONNECTED INC | $10,000 |
| PRO KIDS GOLF ACADEMY INC | $6,000 |
| PARENTS HELPING PARENTS INC | $6,000 |
| READY TO SUCCEED | $6,000 |
| STAR PAL | $6,000 |
| PALMS TO PINES PARASPORTS | $6,000 |
| NICKERSONROSSI DANCE | $6,000 |
| CHOC FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| DAP HEALTH INC | $6,000 |
| CHILDRENS INSTITUTE INC | $6,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS AN | $6,000 |
| HACK THE HOOD INC | $6,000 |
| SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS | $6,000 |
| CAMP KESEM NATIONAL | $6,000 |
| SAN MARCOS PROMISE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
96 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 66 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $344k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHOME START INC4× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +1%
- FTFOUNDATION THINKAGAIN4× · 2022–2025 · $29k · revenue +38%
- MBMission Bit4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF COMPTON YAL INCone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
- ASAutism Society of San Francisco Bay Areaone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
- SJST JOHN BOSCO HIGH SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +733% · 71% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…
Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…
Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
To make positive interventions in the lives of young people by offering alternatives to gangs and violence. legacy la builds the capacity of youth to reach their full potential and equips them with tools to transform their lives and…
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
Boys Republic provides both residential and non-residential youth services to disadvantaged, at-risk young people throughout California. It operates six facilities, all in Southern California: a 200 acre residential campus, school, and…
Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.
Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.
Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is The Reach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 187 of the 233 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOME START INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION THINKAGAIN ↗
- Who funds Mission Bit ↗
- Who funds Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor ↗
- Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE ZONES ↗
- Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS NOT TOOTHLESS ↗
- Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KIDS CHANCE OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds Rockside Inc ↗
- Who funds TARIQ KHAMISA FOUNDATION INC TKF ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds THE EMILY SHANE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE D ↗
- Who funds CASA YOUTH SHELTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH ↗
- Who funds East Bay Agency for Children ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds LONG BEACH BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
- Who funds CASA of San Mateo County ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds Christian Outreach Appeal dba Christian Outreach in Action ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds KEEPING KONNECTED INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds BARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC OF OC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Henry L Guenther Foundation · California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Weingart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goodwin Family Memorial Tua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Goodwin Family Memorial Tua?
Find your warmest path to Goodwin Family Memorial Tua through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.