Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Amplify Her Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$952k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Youth Development$603kEmployment$470kCommunity Improvement$245kArts & Culture$107kHealth$100kReligion$100kHuman Services$100kInternational$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $753k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Seeds of Fortune$53,180
Hot Bread Kitchen$50,000
South Asian Youth Action (SAYA)$50,000
Girls Inc of New York City$50,000
The Lower Eastside Girls Club$50,000
Powher New York$50,000
Latinas On the Verge of Excellence - LOVE Inc$50,000
Girls Who Invest Inc$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
92nd Street Y$50,000
New Women New Yorkers$50,000
Girl Scout Council of Greater New York Inc$50,000
The YWCA of Brooklyn Inc$50,000
Bottomless Closet$50,000
Full STEAM Forward Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $375k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hot Bread Kitchen: $50k → 17%South Asian Youth Action (SAYA): $50k → 13%Hot Bread Kitchen: $50k → 17%New Women New Yorkers: $50k → 17%New Women New Yorkers: $50k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $10k → 17%Women Moving Millions: $10k → 17%The New York Women's Foundation: $4k → 17%The New York Women's Foundation Inc: $808 → 17%Bottomless Closet: $50k → 17%Bottomless Closet: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 16 repeat orgs$635k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-16%

Still filing today

100%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $378k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SEEDS OF FORTUNE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $103k · revenue +204%
  • NW
    NEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +40%
  • LO
    LATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AI
    ASCENDUS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +15%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SA
    South Asian Youth Action
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Achieving Success
Employment
2
Girls in Stem
Human Services
3
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
4
Nontraditional Employment for Women

See schedule onontraditional employment for women (new) prepares, trains, and places women in careers in the skilled construction, utility, and maintenance trades, helping women achieve economic independence and a secure future.

Employment
5
Womens Campaign International

Women's campaign international (wci) empowers girls and women around the world to actively participate and fill leadership roles in the economy, community development, civil society, and pacebuilding efforts.

International
6
Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.

Education
7
Fwa of New York Inc

Promote the professional development and advancement of all women through education, mentorship, networking, alliances, and advocacy across the financial sector.

Philanthropy
8
Center for the Women of New York

The center for the women of new york helps women overcome financial, violence,social, wellness, and legal issues by raising awareness and advocating for full gender equality for women.

Human Services
9
Ladies Who Launch Inc
Education
10
Female Strong

Female strong is a 501c3 non-profit organization and a community of committed individuals that offer hands-on programs, mentorship, and experiences that build confidence in middle and high school girls. we support the inclusion of all…

Community Improvement
11
The Young Womens Christian Association the City of New York

The YWCA of the City of New York (YWCA NYC) empowers women in New York City to advocate for Themselves, their families, and their communities as they navigate the intersections of race, class, and gender. Through culturally responsive…

Human Services
12
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of New York City and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the City of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%7%<5yr15%10%5–10yr21%31%10–20yr22%35%20–35yr14%3%35–55yr9%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%6%<5yr15%8%5–10yr21%39%10–20yr22%28%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr9%15%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
11%
3,927/36,049

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
12/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $100,000 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTDNEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesNEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS…BOTTOMLESS CLOSET — $100,000 · Human ServicesBOTTOMLESS CLOSETSOUTH ASIAN YOUTH ACTION SAYA INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH ASIAN YOUTH ACT…WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS…+1 more — $4,508 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF FORTUNE INC — $103,180 · Youth DevelopmentSEEDS OF FORTUNE …LATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATINAS ON THE VE…THE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LOWER EAST SI…Girl Scouts of Greater NY Inc — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts of Gr…Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INCIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSouth Asian Youth Action — $50,000 · OtherSouth Asian Youth ActionFelicias Promise Inc — $25,000 · OtherFULL STEAM FORWARD INC — $100,000 · OtherFULL STEAM FORWARD INCSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $75,000 · OtherSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INCCoalition Against Trafficking In Women — $70,000 · OtherCoalition Against Trafficking In Wo…Moonshot Initiative INC — $40,000 · OtherMoonshot Initiative INCGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY — $50,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY+4 more — $55,150 · Other+4 morePOWHER NEW YORK INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementPOWHER NEW Y…Welcome To Chinatown Inc — $70,000 · Community ImprovementWelcome To C…ASCENDUS INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementASCENDUS INCGIRLS WHO INVEST INC — $100,000 · EmploymentGIRLS WHO…CUSTOM COLLABORATIVE INC — $70,000 · EmploymentCUSTOM CO…THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $150,000 · ReligionSADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC — $75,000 · EducationTHE STATEN ISLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationTHE BELLA ABZUG LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC — $25,000 · EducationIGNITE — $15,000 · Education
Human Services$374,508Youth Development$303,180Other$615,150Community Improvement$220,000Employment$170,000Religion$150,000Education$140,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEEDS OF FORTUNE INC — $103,180 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC — $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetLATINAS ON THE VERGE OF EXCELLENCE- LOVE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetBOTTOMLESS CLOSET — $100,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetPOWHER NEW YORK INC — $100,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetFULL STEAM FORWARD INC — $100,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetGIRLS WHO INVEST INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSADIE NASH LEADERSHIP PROJECT INC — $75,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCUSTOM COLLABORATIVE INC — $70,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWelcome To Chinatown Inc — $70,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women — $70,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater NY Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASCENDUS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH ASIAN YOUTH ACTION SAYA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMoonshot Initiative INC — $40,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE STATEN ISLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE BELLA ABZUG LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetFelicias Promise Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $16,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIGNITE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $4,508 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Every OrgNew York Women's Foun…Brooklyn Community Fo…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Rockefeller Philanthr…The Hyde and Watson F…FjcTd Charitable Foundat…Tides FoundationPinkerton FoundationPwc Foundation IncAmalgamated Charitabl…
Every OrgCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Every Org · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Fjc · Td Charitable Foundation · Tides Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Amplify Her Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Amplify Her Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Amplify Her Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home