How much did Amplify Her Charitable Foundation grant in FY2024?

Human Services$375kYouth Development$303kCommunity Improvement$220kEmployment$170kEducation$140kPhilanthropy$75kInternational$70kArts & Culture$57kCivil Rights$50kOther$513k

02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $9k
$10k–50k9 grants · $190k
$50k–250k15 grants · $753k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

Seeds of Fortune$53,180
Powher New York$50,000
92nd Street Y$50,000
The Lower Eastside Girls Club$50,000
Girl Scout Council of Greater New York Inc$50,000
The YWCA of Brooklyn Inc$50,000
Latinas On the Verge of Excellence - LOVE Inc$50,000
Girls Who Invest Inc$50,000
South Asian Youth Action (SAYA)$50,000
Bottomless Closet$50,000
Hot Bread Kitchen$50,000
Girls Inc of New York City$50,000
New Women New Yorkers$50,000
Full STEAM Forward Inc$50,000
Women Creating Change$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $375k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$785k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$357k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%

+32%

Still filing today

93%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $428k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SO
Seeds of Fortune Inc
2× · 2023–2024 · $103k · revenue +160%
LO
Latinas on the Verge of Excellence-Love Inc
2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +362%
GW
Girls Who Invest Inc
2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +382%

Funded once

A
Ascendusgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +32%
SA
South Asian Youth Action
one grant, 2023 · $50k
MT
Me Too
one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Center for the Women of New York

The center for the women of new york helps women overcome financial, violence,social, wellness, and legal issues by raising awareness and advocating for full gender equality for women.

Human Services

New York Women's Chamber of Commerce Inc

The New York Women's Chamber of Commerce is a not-for-profit charitable 501(c) (3) tax exempt organization dedicated to assisting women, and other disadvantaged minorities achieve success and economic independence through small business,…

Community Improvement

Women Empowerment Coalition of Nyc

Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.

Human Services

New York Asian Women's Center Inc

Womankind works with survivors of gender based violence to rise above trauma and build a path to healing.

—

National Organization for Women-

To advocate for the rights of women in all areas of society based on gender, race, ethnicity, age, economic status and sexual orientation.

—

Women of the World Endowment Inc

Wowe seeks to create investment systems that center women in addressing the world's challenges.

—

Girls With Impact Inc

To level the playing field for all women in business & beyond by equipping them with the skills, tools, and network to be tomorrow's leaders, innovators and entrepreneurs.

Education

Bay Area Women Leader Network

How Women Lead elevates diverse women leaders in the corporate, public, philanthropic, and nonprofit sectors by cultivating a robust network that trains and connects women executives who are catalysts in their fields.

Human Services

Girls in Tech Inc

Girls in tech (git) is a global non-profit focused on the engagement, education and empowerment of girls and women who are passionate about technology. our aim is to accelerate the growth of innovative women who are entering into the…

—

Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. is a non-profit organization founded in Brooklyn, NY. DGI is dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of our communities, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM (Science, Technology,…

Education

Women's Business Enterprise National

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights

The Women's Bakery Inc

The women's bakery is a social enterprise that empowers women through accredited training, employment, and social programming, and builds bakeries that sell high quality and affordable breads to east african communities.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Women's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Staten Island Chamber of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/27

the rest of the field

1,828/20,156

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

25/26

Grantees still filing

20/26

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$690,150Human Services$374,508Youth Development$303,180Community Improvement$220,000Employment$170,000Education$140,000Philanthropy$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Every OrgCA18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Every Org · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Fjc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Amplify Her Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Powher New York.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +91% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 473609446 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Powher New York, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Amplify Her Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Amplify Her Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Amplify Her Charitable Foundation

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Amplify Her Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Amplify Her Charitable Foundation

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

26 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Amplify Her Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph