Skip to content
Every Org at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Every Org

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45M
Granted FY2024still arriving
210
Grants FY2024still arriving
32
States reached
$7.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$17MInternational$15MReligion$11MHealth$8.9MEnvironment$3.9MScience & Tech$3.0MYouth Development$2.6MEducation$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 210 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k71 grants · $2.5M
  • $50k–250k112 grants · $11M
  • $250k+27 grants · $31M
$61,744
Median grant
32
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION UNITED STATES$7,798,492
TOTAL PAID TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 25K$6,580,200
PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF SAINT PETER$5,047,877
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE$1,342,682
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$990,618
NATIONAL VETERANS HOMELESS SUPPORT$981,530
FOUNDERS PLEDGE$757,630
VETERANS FOR CHILD RESCUE$704,212
MARANATHA CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER$616,892
CONGREGATION CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF FLATBUSH$610,611
Individual grant recipient$576,466
MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES$541,289
NETWORK FOR GOOD$474,870
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$437,794
NORTHCROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH$359,146
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $50k → 17%GATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL: $114k → 9%THINKING HUTS: $39k → 16%FREEDOM AVIATION NETWORK: $30k → 14%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $143k → 22%JOYRIDE CARS INC: $10k → 14%GROWING VETERANS: $6k → 12%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $6k → 7%KAFEEL ORPHAN CARE CORP: $117k → 14%GATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL: $75k → 9%GATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL: $57k → 9%NO END TO LOVE: $52k → 8%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $15k → 9%CHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND: $51k → 9%THINK OF US: $57k → 14%NO END TO LOVE INC: $10k → 8%FAR AWAY PROJECTS: $75k → 12%THE CHILDREN'S GLOBAL HEALTH FUND: $49k → 9%NO END TO LOVE INC: $8k → 8%THE FESTIVAL CENTER: $45k → 14%HERO HOUSE NW: $5k → 9%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $163k → 10%CLOSEGAP: $11k → 14%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $123k → 10%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $212k → 9%RETHINK PRIORITIES: $27k → 10%BUSINESSES ENDING SLAVERY AND TRAFFICKING: $7k → 9%WISHING WELL INC: $13k → 10%SUMMIT COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 9%CORE: $51k → 14%CORE: $49k → 14%BOTTOMLESS CLOSET: $40k → 17%NEW STORY: $22k → 10%NEW STORY: $16k → 10%NEW STORY: $12k → 10%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%NEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS: $50k → 17%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Every Org’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Every Orglessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 100 repeat orgs$41M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

100 repeat relationships: 66 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 139 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
197

Total granted

$25M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+8%

Still filing today

72%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $589k · revenue +59%
  • AC
    ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $526k · revenue +14%
  • LB
    LIL BUBS ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $482k · revenue +4% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

  • NF
    NETWORK FOR GOOD
    one grant, 2023 · $2.4M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $970k
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $740k · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth connects thinkers, doers, activists, and knowledge holders from around the world to solve humanity's greatest ecological challenges--together. Our belief is simple: The solutions to the climate crisis already exist. By connecting…

Environment
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
5
Center for Humane Technology

Center for Humane Technology is a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring that the most consequential technologies actually serve humanity. We bring clarity to how the tech ecosystem works in order to shift the incentives that drive it.

Science & Tech
6
Sentinel Research

We help the public by foreseeing and reacting to globally impactful and existential catastrophes. We forecast near-term risks, detect black swans earlier, and deploy our emergency response team to take mitigating action.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
10
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
11
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
12
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

298 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 298 of the 444 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

34
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
290/298
Grantees still filing
149/298
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOTAL PAID TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 25K: $6,580,200 · OtherTOTAL PAID TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS UNDER 25KPRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF ST PETER INC: $5,047,877 · OtherPRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF ST PETER INCNETWORK FOR GOOD: $2,446,497 · OtherNETWORK FOR GOODGLOBAL CHANGE DATA LAB: $1,623,933 · Other+127 more: $26,225,730 · Other+127 moreMYRIAD USA INC: $9,327,315 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,603,808 · InternationalInternational Rescue…INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $480,355 · International+17 more: $2,801,050 · International+17 moreMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC: $3,601,655 · HealthMULTIDISCIP…ICHOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,563,540 · HealthICHOR RESEA…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $700,000 · HealthTHE CHILDRE…LIVEBETTER CORP: $436,351 · HealthLIVEBETTER …AdventHealth Foundation Inc: $324,305 · Health+11 more: $1,262,327 · Health+11 moreNETWORK FOR GOOD: $6,469,236 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK F…+3 more: $295,149 · Public Safety & DisasterFOUNDERS PLEDGE INC: $3,191,784 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $522,152 · PhilanthropyTHOMSON REUTERS FOUNDATION INC: $198,935 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND: $166,028 · PhilanthropyThe Life You Can Save: $157,661 · Philanthropy+4 more: $334,715 · PhilanthropyGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $845,737 · Human ServicesRethink Priorities: $312,679 · Human ServicesGATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL INC: $245,862 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $211,720 · Human ServicesIGNITE ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $181,504 · Human ServicesROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS: $143,252 · Human ServicesKAFEEL ORPHAN CARE: $116,871 · Human ServicesCORE: $100,096 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS GLOBAL HEALTH FUND INC: $99,593 · Human Services+4 more: $277,747 · Human ServicesSPRITELY NETWORKED COMMUNITIES INSTITUTE: $791,656 · Science & TechALIGNMENT RESEARCH CENTER: $356,642 · Science & TechFAR AI INC: $285,309 · Science & TechAMBER INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $202,974 · Science & TechZIG SOFTWARE FOUNDATION INC: $194,561 · Science & TechPalisade Research: $105,528 · Science & Tech+1 more: $60,788 · Science & Tech
Other$41,924,237International$14,212,528Health$7,888,178Public Safety & Disaster$6,764,385Philanthropy$4,571,275Human Services$2,535,061Science & Tech$1,997,458

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $9,327,315 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $6,469,236 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC: $3,601,655 over 3y, 16% of budgetFOUNDERS PLEDGE INC: $3,191,784 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,603,808 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetICHOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,563,540 over 2y, 41% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC: $1,342,682 over 1y, 45% of budgetNational Veterans Homeless Support Inc: $981,530 over 1y, 74% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $845,737 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPRITELY NETWORKED COMMUNITIES INSTITUTE: $791,656 over 2y, 100% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $740,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetVeterans For Child Rescue Inc: $704,212 over 1y, 47% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $700,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $588,966 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $550,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS: $526,494 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $522,152 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLIL BUBS ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION: $481,670 over 4y, 63% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $480,355 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStreetlife Ministries: $456,441 over 4y, 19% of budgetLIVEBETTER CORP: $436,351 over 3y, 42% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $394,180 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetALIGNMENT RESEARCH CENTER: $356,642 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHUMAN APPEAL: $345,198 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOUNTAIN FOR THE NATURAL ORDER OF OUR EXISTENCE: $344,491 over 2y, 56% of budgetLIDTKE SMALL ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $335,345 over 2y, 74% of budgetAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $324,305 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRethink Priorities: $312,679 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FUTURE SOCIETY INC: $303,734 over 1y, 14% of budgetFAR AI INC: $285,309 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGIRLS WRITE NOW INC: $279,257 over 1y, 11% of budgetFRANCISCAN PEACEMAKERS INC: $275,266 over 1y, 24% of budgetVOTE MAMA FOUNDATION INC: $263,709 over 1y, 19% of budget10 ACADEMY CORP: $250,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetGATOR WILDERNESS CAMP SCHOOL INC: $245,862 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetLightcone Infrastructure Inc: $233,483 over 1y, 15% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $227,588 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDHARMA GATES INC: $223,432 over 2y, 59% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $219,610 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $217,255 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $211,720 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetLongevity Escape Velocity Foundation: $210,417 over 1y, 25% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $206,928 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMBER INITIATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $202,974 over 2y, 91% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $202,919 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUNGI FOUNDATION INC: $198,476 over 5y, 16% of budgetDaniel Webster Elementary PTA: $196,211 over 2y, 46% of budgetZIG SOFTWARE FOUNDATION INC: $194,561 over 1y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Effective Ventures Fo…Founders Pledge IncGood Ventures Foundat…Amplify Her Charitabl…Silicon Valley Commun…Double Up Drive IncRethink CharityHumane America Animal…Jewish Community Fede…Daffy Charitable FundManifold for Charity …ISRB Fund Inc
Effective Ventures Foundation USA IncCA46.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Founders Pledge Inc · Good Ventures Foundation · Amplify Her Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Double Up Drive Inc · Rethink Charity · Humane America Animal Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Daffy Charitable Fund · Manifold for Charity Inc · ISRB Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Every Org funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Every Org. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 260%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Project Citizenship Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
26get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Every Org?

Find your warmest path to Every Org through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 444 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Every Org’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home