California · Nonprofit
VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY (California) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $270,037 to it, the largest being Herman P and Sophia Taubman Foundation %Bank of Oklahoma Private Wealth ($110,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $420k
- Funders on record
- 10
- Grants received
- $270k
- Net assets
- $284k
What Villages of San Mateo County does
Mission
We enable seniors to live in their own homes independently, connect with their community, and age with dignity and grace.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Program
Provide transportation for members to medical appointments, shopping and attending social functions; home repairs and other assistance around the home and yard to make a safe and healthy living environment; cultural and social events and a variety of other services that encourage older adults to engage with the community to avoid isolation and to have enriched and fulfilling lives.
The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $0.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $427k to $323k (−24%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 18% · 2022 14% · 2023 11% · 2024 17% · 2025 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (84% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Susan E Eldredge
Executive Director
Board chair
Patrick Brown
Chair, Member of Board of Directors
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $10k → $66k.
4 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 22% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
52% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 44% · 2021 66% · 2022 85% · 2023 76% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 90% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY draws 82% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $58k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY has grown faster than half of the 1,934 public benefit nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,934 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
83% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY?
- VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY (California) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $270,037 to it, the largest being Herman P and Sophia Taubman Foundation %Bank of Oklahoma Private Wealth ($110,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY have?
- IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $270,037 in grants to VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY?
- Herman P and Sophia Taubman Foundation %Bank of Oklahoma Private Wealth is the largest funder on record, with $110,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like VILLAGES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Villages of San Mateo County →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing