California · Nonprofit
THE CECILIA FUND
THE CECILIA FUND (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $747,032 to it, the largest being St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara ($279,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundationshared funderslocalportfolio match
- June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Trshared funderslocalportfolio match
- Balin Hildegard Charit Tua-Mainshared fundersportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $36k → $87k.
1 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE CECILIA FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
THE CECILIA FUND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 37% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE CECILIA FUND.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 68% · 2018 53% · 2019 56% · 2020 50% · 2021 38% · 2022 53% · 2023 45% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
100% of THE CECILIA FUND's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
87% of THE CECILIA FUND's grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $201k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 16 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundationshared funderslocalportfolio matchCA · backs 189 organizations that share your funders · funds 245 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Trshared funderslocalportfolio matchCA · backs 74 organizations that share your funders · funds 68 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Balin Hildegard Charit Tua-Mainshared fundersportfolio matchMO · backs 27 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Montecito Firefighters Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Roehrig Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Agnes B Kline Memorial Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 68 organizations that share your funders · funds 65 organizations near you
- Towbes Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 90 organizations that share your funders · funds 77 organizations near you
- James S Bower Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 68 organizations that share your funders · funds 75 organizations near you
- The Wood-Claeyssens Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 108 organizations that share your funders · funds 112 organizations near you
- Walter J & Holly O Thomson Charitableshared fundersTX · backs 43 organizations that share your funders
- The John C Mithun Foundationshared funderslocalCA · backs 39 organizations that share your funders · funds 36 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like THE CECILIA FUND
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
96% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE CECILIA FUND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds THE CECILIA FUND?
- THE CECILIA FUND (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $747,032 to it, the largest being St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara ($279,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does THE CECILIA FUND have?
- IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $747,032 in grants to THE CECILIA FUND, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of THE CECILIA FUND?
- St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara is the largest funder on record, with $279,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like THE CECILIA FUND find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 16funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing