· Private foundation
Utah Medical Association Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $161k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $61,500 |
| Peoples Health Clinic | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| Wasatch Homeless Healthcare Inc | $35,000 |
| Moab Free Health Clinic | $25,000 |
| Doctors Volunteer Clinic of St George | $20,000 |
| United Way of Northern Utah | $15,000 |
| Eye Care for Kids | $10,500 |
| Community Nursing Services | $10,000 |
| American Red Cross | $10,000 |
| Odyssey House | $8,000 |
| Rape Recovery Center | $8,000 |
| Dove Center | $7,000 |
| Junior League of Salt Lake City | $6,000 |
| First Step House | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPeople's Health Clicnic9× · 2017–2025 · $218k · revenue +426%
- WHWasatch Homeless Health Care6× · 2018–2025 · $148k · revenue +142%
- DVDOCTORS' VOLUNTEER CLINIC9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- WMWasatch Medical Health Care Incone grant, 2024 · $20k
- CFCystic Fibrosis Foundationone grant, 2022 · $8k
- GDGOOD DEED REVOLUTIONone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…
To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
USARA's mission is to connect and inspire communities to advocate for addiction recovery. We envision a Utah where recovery community and connection are recognized as the most valuable assets for people to recover from addiction.
Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Support Center and the most unlike its peers is Childrens Truth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds DOCTORS' VOLUNTEER CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
- Who funds MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Community Health Connect ↗
- Who funds RAPE RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC ↗
- Who funds ABILITY FOUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FIT TO RECOVER INC ↗
- Who funds WASATCH FORENSIC NURSES INC ↗
- Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
- Who funds THE SHARING PLACE ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEP HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CHARITY CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EYE CARE FOR KIDS - Utah ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN UTAH ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
- Who funds WORK ACTIVITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Utah Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds MOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Needs Beyond Medicine ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Ihc Health Services Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Utah's Promise · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche Charitable Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Utah Medical Association Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Utah Medical Association Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Utah Medical Association Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.