Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Coserv Charitable Foundation

To provide (1) financial assistance to individuals and their families through specific assistance and contributions to local charities and community projects, and (2) grants to local not-for-profits that provide critical services to the community and/or support education.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$3.3MEducation$2.2MFood & Nutrition$1.6MHousing & Shelter$1.0MHealth$798kPublic Safety & Disaster$378kCrime & Legal$314kYouth Development$205kOther$0
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 80 grants below total $1,629,274 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,945,434 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $316,160 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k61 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $416k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$187k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL COMMUNITY OUTREACH$205,995
COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER INC$110,000
COOKE COUNTY VOAD$50,000
FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER$50,000
PEDIPLACE$45,000
HEARTS FOR HOMES$40,000
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION$40,000
SPAN INC$40,000
DENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$35,000
LEWISVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$35,000
FRISCO EDUCATION FOUNDATION$35,000
HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC$30,000
LOVEPACS$29,000
LITTLE ELM ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
NORTHWEST ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEXAS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $25k → 8%CITY HOUSE INC: $20k → 5%HOPES DOOR INC: $20k → 5%NTX COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $40k → 8%LOVEPACS: $40k → 8%LOVEPACS: $30k → 8%DENTON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $51k → 8%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $134k → 5%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $40k → 8%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $61k → 5%DENTON CITY COUNTY DAY SCHOOL: $39k → 8%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER: $50k → 5%GRACE LIKE RAIN INC: $33k → 8%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 5%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 5%DENTON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $20k → 8%GRACE LIKE RAIN INC: $20k → 8%GRACE LIKE RAIN INC: $20k → 8%LIFE MESSAGE INC: $20k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $35k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES INC: $20k → 14%FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES: $55k → 8%LOVEPACS: $29k → 5%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $40k → 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $30k → 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $25k → 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $20k → 8%HEARTS FOR HOMES: $20k → 8%SITI AND JIDO PARK FOUNDATION INC: $55k → 8%SPAN INC: $40k → 8%SPAN INC: $30k → 8%SPAN INC: $30k → 8%KIWANIS CLUB CHILDRENS CLINIC: $20k → 8%SPAN INC DBA MEALS ON WHEELS: $20k → 8%CUMBERLAND PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $20k → 8%CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 8%REFRESH FRISCO: $25k → 5%COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER INC: $110k → 5%COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER INC: $105k → 5%COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER: $99k → 5%COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER: $55k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS OF COLLIN COUNTY: $25k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS OF COLLIN COUNTY: $25k → 5%COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER: $25k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS OF COLLIN COUNTY: $20k → 5%MEALS ON WHEELS OF COLLIN COUNTY: $20k → 5%ADAPTIVE TRAINING FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION: $27k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.3M · 120 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

120 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
68

Total granted

$9.3M
$873k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+16%

Still filing today

88%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +75%
  • CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $759k · revenue +225%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $394k · revenue +727%

Funded once

  • SA
    Siti and Jido Park Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue +16%
  • ND
    North Dallas Food Pantry
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -20%
  • DC
    DENTON CITY-COUNTY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $39k · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
2
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
3
Dallas County Family Resource Center

The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…

Human Services
4
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
5
VolunteerNow

VolunteerNow transforms lives through volunteers. As the hub of volunteerism in North Texas, and a national thought leader, VolunteerNow provides a wide range of programs and services to build capacity for nonprofit and community…

Philanthropy
6
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
7
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
8
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
9
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
11
Pleasant Grove Food Pantry Inc

Pleasant Grove Food Pantry provides nutritious food to qualified residents of Pleasant Grove in southeast Dallas who are food insecure. Fighting food insecurity is the mission and intent of the organization. Services are provided by…

Food & Nutrition
12
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Mission for Life Doing business as Dallas Life and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDallas Community Health & S…Trauma & Resilience Support…Youth & Family Support Serv…Affordable Housing ProvidersEmployee & Cause-Specific A…Community Grantmaking Found…Faith-Based & Independent S…Youth Sports ProgramsSouth Asian Cultural & Educ…Professional & Industry Ass…Faith-Based Global Ministri…Youth Support ServicesSchool District Support Fou…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr18%6%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr7%23%35–55yr12%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr18%2%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr15%34%20–35yr7%39%35–55yr12%4%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%5/198
the rest of the field
17%
4,143/24,483

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

170 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 170 of the 198 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
160/170
Grantees still filing
124/170
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER — $394,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTERFRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER — $388,000 · Human ServicesFRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTERHEARTS FOR HOMES — $246,000 · Human ServicesHEARTS FOR HOMESMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY — $130,000 · Human ServicesSPAN INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesMETROCREST SERVICES — $115,000 · Human ServicesCommunities in Schools of North Texas Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesLovepacs — $99,000 · Human Services+37 more — $1,278,766 · Human Services+37 moreALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $1,049,995 · OtherALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACHPEDIPLACE INC — $210,000 · OtherPEDIPLACE INC+92 more — $2,379,030 · Other+92 moreNorthwest ISD Education Foundation — $200,000 · EducationNorthwest ISD Educa…Lewisville Education Foundation Inc — $190,000 · EducationLewisville Educatio…DENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $190,000 · EducationDENTON PUBLIC SCHOO…LITTLE ELM ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationLITTLE ELM ISD EDUC…PROSPER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $135,000 · EducationPROSPER EDUCATION F…Sanger Education Foundation Inc — $120,000 · EducationSanger Education Fo…Aubrey Education Foundation Inc — $105,000 · EducationAubrey Education Fo…ARGYLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $105,000 · EducationARGYLE EDUCATION FO…MCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $105,000 · EducationMCKINNEY EDUCATION …WILKINSON CENTER — $90,000 · EducationFoundation for Allen Schools — $89,000 · EducationPLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 · Education+10 more — $223,293 · Education+10 moreCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION — $758,520 · Housing & ShelterCHRISTIAN …TEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $57,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP…REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC — $45,900 · Housing & ShelterAGAPE RESOURCE & ASSISTANCE CENTER INC — $35,000 · Housing & Shelter+7 more — $53,974 · Housing & Shelter+7 moreHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $130,000 · HealthLEGACY COUNSELING CENTER INC — $50,000 · HealthFirst Baptist Denton Ministry Center — $49,393 · HealthGRACE TO GROW — $46,000 · HealthNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Health29 ACRES INC — $32,500 · HealthALLIANCE IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthCOMMONGOOD MEDICAL — $20,000 · HealthABILITY CONNECTION TEXAS — $17,500 · Health+7 more — $80,826 · HealthFrisco Education Foundation — $280,000 · PhilanthropyLake Cities Education Foundation INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyOUR DAILY BREAD INC — $120,718 · Food & NutritionMETRO RELIEF — $47,750 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY GARDEN KITCHEN OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $39,500 · Food & NutritionNEIGHBORS NOURISHING NEIGHBORS — $19,787 · Food & NutritionMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $11,200 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$2,870,766Other$3,639,025Education$1,782,293Housing & Shelter$950,394Health$501,219Philanthropy$295,000Food & Nutrition$258,955

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH — $1,049,995 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION — $758,520 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER — $394,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetFRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER — $388,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetFrisco Education Foundation — $280,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetHEARTS FOR HOMES — $246,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC — $210,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNorthwest ISD Education Foundation — $200,000 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $190,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetDENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $190,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetLITTLE ELM ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 7y, 39% of budgetPROSPER EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY — $130,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD INC — $120,718 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSanger Education Foundation Inc — $120,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetSPAN INC — $120,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMETROCREST SERVICES — $115,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $108,969 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHONOR VETERANS NOW — $107,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetAubrey Education Foundation Inc — $105,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetARGYLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetMCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCommunities in Schools of North Texas Inc — $100,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLovepacs — $99,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $96,775 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER — $90,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFoundation for Allen Schools — $89,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION — $88,982 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetCUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $85,804 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetINTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF DENTON INC — $85,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetPLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetGIVING GRACE INC — $79,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DENTON COUNTY INC — $74,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSpecial Abilities of North Texas Inc — $73,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetCITY HOUSE INC — $72,050 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC — $71,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDENTON FREEDOM HOUSE — $68,992 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS SOLUTIONS FOR RECOVERY — $68,244 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetRestored Hope Ministries Inc — $62,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER COLLIN COUNTY — $62,500 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetHOPE'S DOOR NEW BEGINNING CENTER — $62,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLTN - Love Thy Neighbor Inc — $59,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $57,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSiti and Jido Park Foundation Inc — $55,469 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetJUSTIN COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $53,955 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTEXAS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES — $51,700 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LIFELINE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRISCO FAMILY SERVICES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Frisco Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS FOR HOMES ↗
  • Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwest ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Lewisville Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DENTON PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE ELM ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROSPER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS COLLIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Sanger Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPAN INC ↗
  • Who funds METROCREST SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR VETERANS NOW ↗
  • Who funds Aubrey Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARGYLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools of North Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lovepacs ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Allen Schools ↗
  • Who funds THE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF DENTON INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIVING GRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DENTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Abilities of North Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds DENTON FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS SOLUTIONS FOR RECOVERY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…United Way of Metropo…W P & Bulah Luse Foun…Texas Women's Foundat…Hillcrest FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…Gil and Dody Weaver F…The Rees-Jones Founda…The Moody FoundationThe Dallas FoundationCommunity Foundation …North Texas Food Bank
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX87.9× affinity109 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · North Texas Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Coserv Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Coserv Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Coserv Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 198 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home