· Private foundation
Claremont Savings Bank Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cornish Community Initiative | $5,000 |
| On Solid Ground | $5,000 |
| Claremont Soup Kitchen | $4,500 |
| Community Dental Care of Claremont | $4,000 |
| Springfield Family Center Inc | $3,750 |
| Claremont Opera House Inc | $3,750 |
| West Central Behavioral Health | $3,000 |
| Claremont Learning Partnership | $3,000 |
| Springfield Medical Care Systems dba North Star Health | $3,000 |
| West Central Behavioral Health | $3,000 |
| Turning Points Network | $3,000 |
| New Hampshire Catholic Charities Inc dba New Hampshire Food Bank | $3,000 |
| WISE | $2,800 |
| Baby Steps Family Assistance Program | $2,500 |
| TwinState MakerSpaces Inc | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
124 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 86 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCLAREMONT SENIOR CENTER INC8× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +148%
- CLCLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP6× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +24%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- TOTown of Newport NHone grant, 2023 · $5k
- CFCHARLESTOWN FOURSQUARE CHURCH DBA REMIXone grant, 2018 · $5k
- OPOLIVE PETTIS LIBRARY TRUSTEESone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
As one of New Englands leading visual and performing arts institutions, SVAC's mission is to promote and nurture the arts.
The Southwestern Vermont Council on Aging exists to be a community force in creating and sustaining opportunities for elders and caregivers in our region to help assure that elders are able to maintain maximum independence and quality of…
To cultivate a unified voice and dynamic network of senior centers, meal providers, and professionals committed to excellence and responsive to the needs of the states growing older population.
Center provides a supportive gathering place for community members over the age of 50 with free & donation based programs. These programs promote social, physical & emotional wellbeing
Create and provide a continuum of quality affordable housing and eldercare services for the residents of the west river valley and beyond, in cooperation with the community organizations and agencies that serve them.
Fostering, encouraging and assisting the physical location of business enterprises within the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, and having its principal purpose be industrial and economic development of one or more political…
The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.
To enable people to cope with, and reduce the hardships of poverty; create sustainable self-sufficiency; and reduce the causes and move toward the elimination of poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newport Senior Center and the most unlike its peers is Sports Enhancement for Life Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 275 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLAREMONT SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD SUPPORTED HOUSING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Baby Steps Family Assistance ↗
- Who funds Good Neighbor Health Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield VT Inc ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds COVER HOME REPAIR INC ↗
- Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WEST CLAREMONT CENTER FOR MUSIC AND THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds Sullivan County Humane Society ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF VETERANS ↗
- Who funds Upper Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN WINDSOR COUNTY INCUBATOR INC DBA BLACK RIVER INNOVATION CAMPUS ↗
- Who funds CARTER COMMUNITY BUILDING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Springfield Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD AREA PARENT CHILD CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD COMMUNITY PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAINT GAUDENS MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc ↗
- Who funds Full Circle Farm Therapeutic Horsemanship ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mascoma Bank Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Granite United Way · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Claremont Savings Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Therapeutic Works Incorporated — 100% of income from government
- Valley Court Diversion Programs Inc — 84% of income from government
- Meeting Waters Ymca — 75% of income from government
- Springfield Area Parent Child Center — 53% of income from government
- Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc — 40% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield Vt Inc — 24% of income from government
- Springfield On the Move — 22% of income from government
- Veterans Education and Research Association of Northern New England Inc — 17% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc — 16% of income from government
- Windsor Public Library — 9% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc — 5% of income from government
- Northern Stage Company — 5% of income from government
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc — 2% of income from government
- New England Kurn Hattin Homes — 1% of income from government
- Springfield Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- We R Hope — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Claremont Savings Bank Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Claremont Savings Bank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.