· Public charity
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
We advance health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships, providing each person the best care, in the right place, at the right time, every time.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 82 grants below total $3,579,093 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,334,056 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $754,963 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $160k
- $10k–50k48 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k8 grants · $621k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $1,091,164 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM | $388,171 |
| KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $264,415 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $125,648 |
| MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $110,761 |
| TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $80,867 |
| OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY | $67,533 |
| NAVAL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER | $66,632 |
| SEVEN COUNTIES SERVICES INC | $63,405 |
| WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL | $55,182 |
| NORTH COUNTRY HEALTH CONSORTIUM INC | $50,866 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA | $44,519 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE | $44,419 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND | $43,024 |
| Advance Transit | $39,718 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $805k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
115 repeat relationships — 64 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHitchcock Foundation4× · 2021–2024 · $866k · revenue +32%
- CMCheshire Medical Center5× · 2018–2022 · $374k · revenue +65%
- CRCENTERSTONE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $284k · revenue +202%
Funded once
- NHNew Hampshire Hospital Associationone grant, 2019 · $341k · revenue +18%
- CMCENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2022 · $141k · revenue +14%
- VRValley Regional Hospital Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $93k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…
D-HH operates to establish, manage, govern, and fundraise for an integrated healthcare delivery System. To that end, D-HH is particularly focused to: - Manage the healthcare System to provide services to the public in the most…
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
Dartmouth-hitchcock medical center's mission is to offer administrative, planning, and other services designed to promote, advance, and strengthen the interdependent and synergistic activities of the independent supported organizations in…
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.
We advance health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships, providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New London Hospital Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
146 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 146 of the 200 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Healthy Communities ↗
- Who funds Hitchcock Foundation ↗
- Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ↗
- Who funds Cheshire Medical Center ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Hospital Association ↗
- Who funds CENTERSTONE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SEVEN COUNTIES SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE TRANSIT INC ↗
- Who funds Good Neighbor Health Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Public Health Council of the Upper Valley ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Amoskeag Health ↗
- Who funds TWIN PINES HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds The New London Hospital Association Inc ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · The Couch Family Foundation · Endowment For Health Inc · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Agnes M Lindsay Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Twin Pines Housing Trust — 100% of income from government
- Community Mental Health Affiliates Inc — 96% of income from government
- Southeastern Vermont Community Action Inc — 83% of income from government
- Vinfen Corporation — 83% of income from government
- Tri-Valley Transit Inc — 81% of income from government
- Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc — 69% of income from government
- Hartford Community Coalition Inc — 61% of income from government
- Southeast Vermont Transit Inc — 61% of income from government
- Open Sky Community Services Inc — 48% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Turning Point Recovery Center of Springfield Vt Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Advance Transit Inc — 18% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Little Rivers Health Care Inc — 15% of income from government
- Easter Seals Vermont Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc — 5% of income from government
- White River Council on Aging — 1% of income from government
- Windsor Hospital Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.