Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Emily Landecker Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
113
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Education$5.0MEnvironment$2.4MRecreation & Sports$1.8MHuman Services$595kPublic Benefit$433kHousing & Shelter$425kHealth$413kAnimals$324kOther$0
02FY2025 · 113 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k79 grants · $245k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $426k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $420k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.1M
$5,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$37M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPORTS VENUE FOUNDATION DBA UVAC$1,600,000
UNH Foundation$1,500,000
UPPER VALLEY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATI$150,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST$55,000
ADVANCE TRANSIT$53,500
Vermont Institute of Natural Scienc$51,000
REAL ORGANIC PROJECT$50,000
NORTHERN FOREST CENTER$40,000
Vital Communities$33,000
CONNECTICUT RIVER CONSERVANCY$32,500
HUBBARD BROOK RESEARCH FOUNDATION$30,000
CENTER FOR NORTHERN WOODLANDS EDUCA$25,000
THE FAMILY PLACE$25,000
DARTMOUTH GEISEL SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $5k → 10%Southeastern Vermont Community Acti: $2k → 11%ISAIAH 61 CAFE: $3k → 9%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $5k → 10%Southeastern Vermont Community Acti: $2k → 11%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $5k → 10%Southeastern Vermont Community Acti: $2k → 11%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $5k → 10%Southeastern Vermont Community Acti: $2k → 11%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $5k → 10%Southeastern Vermont Community Acti: $2k → 11%Guide Dogs of America: $3k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $5k → 10%Southeastern Vermont Community Acti: $2k → 11%Guide Dogs of America: $2k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $2k → 14%Willing Hands: $10k → 10%Guide Dogs of America: $2k → 14%Guide Dogs of America: $2k → 14%Willing Hands: $10k → 10%Guide Dogs of America: $2k → 14%Willing Hands: $10k → 10%WEBSTER HOUSE: $5k → 7%WEBSTER HOUSE: $5k → 7%Willing Hands: $10k → 10%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%Willing Hands: $10k → 10%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%Willing Hands: $5k → 10%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE: $5k → 10%WEBSTER HOUSE: $3k → 7%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE: $5k → 10%WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE: $5k → 10%WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE: $5k → 10%WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE: $5k → 10%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICE: $3k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
ID
NY
MA
NV
SD
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 119 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

119 repeat relationships — 102 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119
31

Total granted

$11M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+38%

Still filing today

71%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    2× · 2021–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +9%
  • NF
    Northern Forest Center Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $502k · revenue +300%
  • VF
    VISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $425k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of New Hampshire
    one grant, 2024 · $872k
  • TO
    Town of Newport NH
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • SF
    Sustainable Forest Futures Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +924%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermont Land Trust Inc

Rooted in vermont since 1977, the vermont land trust unites land and lives for the enduring benefit of people and the place we share. we help people protect, care for, and connect to land. this includes the farms, forests, natural areas,…

Environment
2
The Vermont River Conservancy Inc

Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.

Human Services
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
5
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
6
Ausable Freshwater Center Incorporated

Advancing science and stewardship of adirondack waters.

Environment
7
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
8
Lakes Region Conservation Trust

The mission of the Organization is the conservation of the natural resources of the Lakes Region of New Hampshire, the preservation of wildlife habitat, the stewardship of lands that define the character of the region and its quality of…

Environment
9
Vermont Public Co

Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.

Arts & Culture
10
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Upper Saco Valley Land Trust

The Organization works with local landowners to permanently protect natural land and waters that define its community and enrich the quality of life by purchasing, managing, negotiating and developing conservations easements in the Upper…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Beginnings Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lebanon Outing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesAddiction Recovery ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Food PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesPublic Library OperationsAffordable Housing Developm…Military Veterans SupportIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%5%<5yr12%7%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr14%35%35–55yr17%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr12%5%5–10yr21%7%10–20yr19%16%20–35yr14%64%35–55yr17%6%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/107
the rest of the field
8%
729/8,633

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
99/103
Grantees still filing
75/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $3,894,245 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION I…Northern Forest Center Inc — $502,000 · EducationNorthern Forest Center Inc+4 more — $157,100 · EducationSPORTS VENUE FOUNDATION DBA UVAC — $1,620,000 · OtherSPORTS VENUE FOUNDATION DBA UVACUniversity of New Hampshire — $872,119 · OtherUniversity of New HampshireUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $265,000 · Other+116 more — $2,425,585 · Other+116 moreVERMONT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE INC — $352,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT INSTITU…Real Organic Project Inc — $325,000 · EnvironmentReal Organic Pr…UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC — $320,000 · EnvironmentUPPER VALLEY LA…THE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC — $167,000 · EnvironmentTHE VERMONT CEN…CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC — $117,500 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT RIV…HUBBARD BROOK RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $115,000 · EnvironmentHUBBARD BROOK R…Sustainable Forest Futures Inc — $100,000 · EnvironmentSustainable For…HANOVER CONSERVANCY — $75,000 · Environment+9 more — $148,000 · Environment+9 moreVISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS — $425,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $75,000 · AnimalsTHE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC — $60,000 · AnimalsAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc — $51,500 · AnimalsUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $45,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $19,000 · AnimalsMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION — $12,000 · AnimalsLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC — $11,500 · Animals+6 more — $34,500 · AnimalsADVANCE TRANSIT INC — $262,083 · Public Benefit+1 more — $4,100 · Public BenefitVITAL COMMUNITIES INC — $192,000 · Community ImprovementGOOD BEGINNINGS INC — $18,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $2,500 · Community Improvement
Education$4,553,345Other$5,182,704Environment$1,719,500Housing & Shelter$425,000Animals$308,500Public Benefit$266,183Community Improvement$212,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $3,894,245 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetNorthern Forest Center Inc — $502,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetVISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS — $425,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetVERMONT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE INC — $352,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetReal Organic Project Inc — $325,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC — $320,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $265,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetADVANCE TRANSIT INC — $262,083 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetVITAL COMMUNITIES INC — $192,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTHE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC — $167,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetUpper Valley Agricultural Association Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCENTER FOR NORTHERN WOODLANDS EDUCATION INC — $150,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTHE SHARON ACADEMY INC — $123,600 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC — $117,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE INC — $115,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHUBBARD BROOK RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetHANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION — $112,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSustainable Forest Futures Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetHANOVER CONSERVANCY — $75,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION — $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC — $60,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetHeadrest Inc — $55,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAtlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc — $51,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $45,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNORTHERN STAGE COMPANY — $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDKMS — $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWhite River Partnership Inc — $32,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING PERSPECTIVES — $30,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetDAVID'S HOUSE INC — $28,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $28,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc — $27,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCLAREMONT SOUP KITCHEN — $27,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLE FLIGHTS — $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEBSTER HOUSE — $21,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF OAKHILL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENCHANTED PEACH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD BEGINNINGS INC — $18,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds VISIONS FOR CREATIVE HOUSING SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Real Organic Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE TRANSIT INC ↗
  • Who funds VITAL COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VERMONT CENTER FOR ECOSTUDIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Upper Valley Agricultural Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR NORTHERN WOODLANDS EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHARON ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUBBARD BROOK RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Forest Futures Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KILHAM BEAR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Headrest Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlantic Salmon Federation (US) Inc ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DKMS ↗
  • Who funds White River Partnership Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…The Couch Family Foun…Mascoma Bank Foundati…The Vermont Community…Claremont Savings Ban…Hypertherm Hope Found…Frank and Brinna Sand…Lane & Elizabeth C Dw…Granite United WaySchon Family Foundati…Cogswell Benevolent T…The Help for People F…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH81.4× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Frank and Brinna Sands Foundation · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · Granite United Way · Schon Family Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · The Help for People Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Emily Landecker Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Southeastern Vermont Community Action Inc — 83% of income from government
  • Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc — 40% of income from government
  • The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
  • Advance Transit Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
  • Fairbanks Museum & Planetarium — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Hubbard Brook Research Foundation — 6% of income from government
  • Vital Communities Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Northern Stage Company — 5% of income from government
  • White River Partnership Inc — 4% of income from government
  • The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Trails Alliance — 3% of income from government
  • Real Organic Project Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Sharon Academy Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Emily Landecker Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Emily Landecker Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines