· Private foundation
The Couch Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k64 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION ASSOCIATION - ECEA | $605,000 |
| CARSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY UNIVERSITY SYSTEM | $536,500 |
| NEW FUTURES | $500,000 |
| MOMSRISING | $491,500 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION (NHCF) | $280,000 |
| THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND | $250,000 |
| WAYPOINT | $205,000 |
| SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT | $199,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE | $128,000 |
| THE FAMILY PLACE | $125,000 |
| TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $125,000 |
| MT ASCUTNEY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER | $101,468 |
| SPRINGFIELD AREA PARENT CHILD CENTER | $100,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE CHILD CARE ADVISORY COUNCILMERRIMACK | $100,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY PARENT CHILD CENTER | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
171 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2024, 105 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNEW FUTURES INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +11%
- WWAYPOINT4× · 2020–2024 · $872k · revenue +47%
- TFTHE FAMILY PLACE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $631k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- FDFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUNDone grant, 2019 · $500k
- USUNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIREone grant, 2023 · $379k
- IHISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +71%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mountain Village is a public Nature-based, Montessori school, engaging students in experiences that integrate natural environments with the Montessori curriculum, igniting achievement in academic, social-emotional and physical development.
Daycare services
In partnership with families, we as an educational community, foster learning in a nurturing, supportive, child-centered environment immersed in nature. we teach, respect and celebrate diversity, individuality, and the whole child.
Fostering, encouraging and assisting the physical location of business enterprises within the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, and having its principal purpose be industrial and economic development of one or more political…
Using the humanities, we connect with people across vermont to create just, vibrant, and resilient communities, and to inspire a lifelong love of learning.
As one of New Englands leading visual and performing arts institutions, SVAC's mission is to promote and nurture the arts.
Develop, nurture and maintain an informed, engaged, and civil new hampshire citizenry.
Spring hill children's center offers year-round nature-based, waldorf-inspired early childhood care programs for ages 3-6 in new hampshire's monadnock region. at spring hill children are given the space and time to truly live into their…
Robins Nest Childrens Center provides high-quality early care and education in a play-based setting.
Children's services
The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Center for Nonprofits and the most unlike its peers is Lebanon Outing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
208 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 208 of the 370 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD AREA PARENT CHILD CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Orange County Parent Child Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE YARD INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR UNDERWAY EXPERIENTIA L LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VITAL COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Public Health Council of the Upper Valley ↗
- Who funds Society for Research in Child Development Inc ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE TRACKS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LET'S GROW KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Grafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Granite United Way · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · The Stannard & Dorothy Dunn Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Couch Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Twin Pines Housing Trust — 100% of income from government
- Southeastern Vermont Community Action Inc — 83% of income from government
- Central Vermont Adult Basic Education Inc — 75% of income from government
- Safeline Inc — 64% of income from government
- Orange County Parent Child Center Inc — 63% of income from government
- Hartford Community Coalition Inc — 61% of income from government
- Springfield Area Parent Child Center — 53% of income from government
- Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
- Magic Mountain Childrens Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Caring Community Preschool — 31% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc — 30% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Yard Inc — 28% of income from government
- Building Audacity — 24% of income from government
- Hunger Free Vermont Inc — 24% of income from government
- Toddlers Morning Out — 18% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Veterans Legal Services Inc — 16% of income from government
- Little Rivers Health Care Inc — 15% of income from government
- Vermont Community Loan Fund — 14% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Treehouse Childrens School Inc — 11% of income from government
- Windsor Public Library — 9% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc — 5% of income from government
- Northern Stage Company — 5% of income from government
- Upper Valley Waldorf School — 4% of income from government
- White River Partnership Inc — 4% of income from government
- Montshire Museum of Science Inc — 4% of income from government
- Vermont Energy Education Program Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance — 3% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Island Housing Trust Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sail Martha's Vineyard Inc — 1% of income from government
- Vermont Public Co — 0% of income from government
- Inclusive Arts Vermont Inc — 0% of income from government
- We R Hope — 0% of income from government
- Island Grown Initiative Ltd — 0% of income from government
- Zack's Place Enrichment Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Couch Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Couch Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.