Skip to content
Chi St Joseph's Children at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Chi St Joseph's Children

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$275kHuman Services$240kPhilanthropy$71kCommunity Improvement$70kCivil Rights$60kEducation$46kHousing & Shelter$45kReligion$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $57,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $66,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,900 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$36,000
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$11,000
GOOD SHEPERD CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $45k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $42k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $36k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $35k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $12k → 14%Catholic Charities: $9k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $6k → 14%CUIDANDO DE LOS NINOS: $30k → 14%CLNKids Inc: $10k → 14%CUIDANDO DE LOS NINOS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Chi St Joseph's Children’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 85%.

Chi St Joseph's Childrenlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$697k · 10 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +146% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$697k
$185k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+146%
0%

Still filing today

60%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +146%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND OF NEW MEXICO
    2× · 2017–2019 · $175k · revenue +10%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2017–2020 · $55k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO LIONS OPERATION KIDSIGHT
    one grant, 2017 · $80k · revenue +17% · 45% of their budget
  • LV
    LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -12%
  • SN
    SEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Growing Up New Mexicoinc

The mission of growing up new mexico is to engage the whole community, bringing together people and resources to create increased opportunities for young children and the adults in their lives to achieve their dreams and aspirations.

Philanthropy
2
La Vida Felicidad Inc

Life quality of children and families, adults, and seniors, through advocacy and individualized services in collaboration with community partnerships.

—
3
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
4
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
5
Social and Emotional Learning Alliance for Nm

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…

Education
6
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
7
New Mexico Child First Network Inc

The purpose of the new mexico child first network is to support children and their caretakers in the new mexico child protective services care and custody. the primary goal is to provide support and training to caregivers and children in…

Human Services
8
Nmvc Action Fund

NMVC Action Fund engages in lobbying activities in support of New Mexicos children and families and it participates in electoral activities.

Youth Development
9
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture
10
Cplc New Mexico Inc

Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…

Community Improvement
11
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
12
New Mexico Construction Alliance

As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Villa Therese Catholic Clinic Sisters of Ciincinnati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND OF NEW MEXICO: $175,200 · OtherCHILDREN'S CANCER FUND OF NEW MEXICOTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SANTA FE: $71,000 · OtherTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF S…ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SANTA FE: $20,000 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN…CUIDANDO LOS NINOS INC: $20,000 · OtherCUIDANDO LOS NINOS INCSEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS: $15,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CENTER OF ALBEQUERQUE: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $55,000 · Other+6 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $209,600 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIESCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INCNEW MEXICO LIONS OPERATION KIDSIGHT: $80,000 · HealthNEW MEXICO …ST LUKE'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthST LUKE'S F…PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $50,000 · Community ImprovementLAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN: $20,000 · Community ImprovementNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $55,000 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000 · Civil RightsNew Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children: $36,000 · EducationNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$371,200Human Services$254,600Health$90,000Community Improvement$70,000Civil Rights$60,000Education$36,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $209,600 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER FUND OF NEW MEXICO: $175,200 over 2y, 18% of budgetNEW MEXICO LIONS OPERATION KIDSIGHT: $80,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $55,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNew Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children: $36,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetLAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FLAMENCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Santa Fe Community Fo…Marshall L and Perrin…Con Alma Health Found…New Mexico Community …Pnm Tnmp FoundationAnchorum St VincentBrindle FoundationNusenda FoundationCarl C Anderson Sr an…WK Kellogg FoundationNatl Christian Charit…
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Brindle Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chi St Joseph's Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chi St Joseph's Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chi St Joseph's Children?

    Find your warmest path to Chi St Joseph's Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chi St Joseph's Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home