Skip to content
California Primary Care Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

California Primary Care Association

To lead and position community clinics, health centers, and networksthrough advocacy, education and services as key players in the healthcare delivery system to improve the health status of their communities.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$30MPublic Benefit$2.0MHuman Services$683kCivil Rights$102kArts & Culture$100kCommunity Improvement$50k
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k30 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+14 grants · $7.8M
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REDWOOD COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION$1,071,751
CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES$974,398
CCALAC$843,654
COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC$727,925
ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES$683,786
COALITION OF ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY CLINICS$680,352
COMMUNITY CLINICS HEALTH NETWORK DBA HEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS$570,255
COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION INLAND SOUTHERN REGION$533,903
ALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM$343,218
NORTH COAST CLINICS NETWORK$309,330
CA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH$290,371
HEALTH CENTER PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$278,997
CA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD$270,000
CENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK$254,241
SAN FRANCISCO-COMMUNITY CLINIC CONSORTIUM$206,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $448k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $54k → 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $47k → 10%SHARE OUR SELVES: $75k → 10%DAVIS STREET PRIMARY CARE CLINIC: $5k → 10%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $75k → 10%COFEM: $47k → 14%COFEM: $47k → 14%EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 54 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
49

Total granted

$28M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+39%

Still filing today

94%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $979k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +507% · 47% of their budget
  • COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +27%
  • AH
    ALIADOS HEALTH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • SH
    SAC HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2022 · $175k · revenue +24%
  • OH
    OLE HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +136%
  • MISSION CITY COMMUNITY NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +115%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
2
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
3
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
4
Redwoods Rural Health Center Inc

Redwoods Rural Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary, preventative healthcare services to all people without regard to social or economic status.

Health
5
Mendocino Coast Clinics Inc

Mendocino Coast Clinics

—
6
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
7
Community Health Centers of the Central Coast Inc

To provide primary health and dental care services to low income patients in the Central Coast Communities of California

Health
8
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
9
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
10
Nuestra Clinica Del Valle Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive, patient-centered primary care and to cultivate partnerships between our patients and their health care providers while excelling at customer service.

—
11
Long Valley Health Center

Long Valley Health Center is a rural federally qualified health clinic offering primary health, including physical examinations, dental services, acupuncture, well baby checks and immunizations. Long Valley Health Center will work to…

Health
12
Imperial Beach Community Clinic

Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Comprehensive Community Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lodi Adopt-a-Child. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/104
Grantees still filing
79/104
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES: $3,136,898 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATESCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $2,615,180 · HealthCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTYALIADOS HEALTH: $2,059,687 · HealthALIADOS HEALTHCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS: $1,775,831 · HealthCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICSALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $1,435,072 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATIONCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP): $1,313,425 · HealthCENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $1,097,812 · HealthALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $1,033,486 · HealthNORTH COAST CLINICS NETWORK: $985,747 · Health+64 more: $9,252,286 · Health+64 moreCommunity Health Association Inland Southern Region: $1,765,880 · OtherCommunity Health Associ…HEALTH CENTER PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,161,241 · OtherHEALTH CENTER PARTNERS …CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH: $594,721 · OtherCALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM F…CA BENEFITS ALLIANCE FOR NONPROFITS VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' BENEFICIARY ASSN TR: $538,026 · OtherCA BENEFITS ALLIANCE FO…San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium: $459,250 · OtherSan Francisco Community…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $400,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCAREHERITAGE JUNCTION OF MCCLOUD INC: $380,000 · OtherHERITAGE JUNCTION OF MC…Community Clinic Consortium: $318,085 · Other+16 more: $1,156,811 · Other+16 moreLODI ADOPT-A-CHILD: $408,013 · Human ServicesEL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesLATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $100,000 · Human ServicesCONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA: $93,000 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves Corporation: $75,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $75,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Latino Coalition for Community Leadership: $100,000 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT: $96,000 · Community ImprovementMI FAMILIA EN ACCION: $193,834 · Civil RightsLATINO SERVICE PROVIDERS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureUNICARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $100,000 · Education
Health$24,705,424Other$6,774,014Human Services$856,013Community Improvement$196,000Civil Rights$193,834Arts & Culture$100,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ADVOCATES: $3,136,898 over 7y, 47% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $2,615,180 over 6y, 11% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $2,059,687 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetCOALITION OF OC COMMUNITY CLINICS: $1,775,831 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetCommunity Health Association Inland Southern Region: $1,765,880 over 6y, 25% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $1,435,072 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP): $1,313,425 over 5y, 27% of budgetHEALTH CENTER PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,161,241 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $1,097,812 over 5y, 16% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $1,033,486 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetNORTH COAST CLINICS NETWORK: $985,747 over 6y, 54% of budgetCALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH: $594,721 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetHEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $570,255 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCA BENEFITS ALLIANCE FOR NONPROFITS VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' BENEFICIARY ASSN TR: $538,026 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC: $520,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED HEALTH CENTERS OF THE SAN JOAQUIN: $511,663 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium: $459,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $400,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSouthside Coalition of Community Health Centers: $375,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetCALIFORNIA PLANNED PARENTHOOD EDUCATION FUND INC: $360,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $330,529 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $325,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Clinic Consortium: $318,085 over 4y, 58% of budgetHEALTH ALLIANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $314,615 over 4y, 22% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $275,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC: $260,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWELLSPACE HEALTH: $259,846 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $245,176 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetElica Health Centers: $207,942 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMI FAMILIA EN ACCION: $193,834 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCAMARENA HEALTH: $183,159 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAC HEALTH SYSTEM: $175,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACH TREE HEALTHCARE: $159,165 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOLE HEALTH: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION CITY COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWorking Partnerships USA: $130,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $129,438 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTERS INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICAS DEL CAMINO REAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians…Direct ReliefCalifornia Healthcare…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Essential Access Heal…Delta Dental Communit…The California Wellne…The California Endowm…East Bay Community Fo…Tides CenterPublic Health Institu…Tides Foundation
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California FdnCA116.8× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Essential Access Health · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Center · Public Health Institute · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Primary Care Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Primary Care Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Primary Care Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home