· Private foundation
Berger Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k50 grants · $200k
- $10k–50k39 grants · $630k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $475k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT IN CONSERVATION | $120,000 |
| NEW JERSEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER (NJPAC) | $90,000 |
| ABORTION CARE NETWORK | $90,000 |
| JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION (JCFS) | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PLASTIC SURGEONS | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC (ACLU) | $35,000 |
| LIHI (LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE) | $35,000 |
| EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| CULTUREWORKS LTD | $35,000 |
| THE NIGHT MINISTRY | $30,000 |
| MYGRO FARMS | $25,000 |
| CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE | $25,000 |
| MATTHEW WALKER COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER INC | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SANTA CRUZ | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $629k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
117 repeat relationships — 72 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $232k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $235k · revenue +146%
- CCultureWorks4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +1% · 29% of their budget
- NDNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK5× · 2020–2024 · $108k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- NNJPACone grant, 2022 · $150k
- FFFND FOR THE AMER INST OF CONCERVAone grant, 2020 · $75k
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 237 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT IN CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds MYAGRO FARMS ↗
- Who funds ABORTION CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CultureWorks ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Matthew Walker Comprehensive Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NXTHVN INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds LOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BUCKS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds LIVEWELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PLASTIC SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds KARTEMQUIN EDUCATIONAL FILMS ↗
- Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN LEGAL ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · California Community Foundation · New Venture Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Berger Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Keystone House Inc — 66% of income from government
- Challenge Program Inc — 36% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Kingdom Trail Association Inc — 14% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art Inc — 4% of income from government
- Nxthvn Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Ccsu Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Berger Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Berger Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.