· Private foundation
Arconic Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $205
- $10k–50k109 grants · $3.0M
- $50k–250k32 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE | $300,000 |
| PROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC | $250,000 |
| THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP | $250,000 |
| SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE | $250,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH | $200,000 |
| SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LANCASTER | $175,000 |
| NORTH SCOTT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $150,000 |
| WESTED | $150,000 |
| NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION | $150,000 |
| ONE TREE PLANTED INC | $150,000 |
| FIRST (FOR THE INSPIRATION AND RECOGNITION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY) | $150,000 |
| THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| STEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND | $125,000 |
| MAKERUSA INC | $125,000 |
| BLOOMSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 88% of grant dollars ($33M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($4.5M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 12% of all-years giving ($4.5M)
7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Arconic Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 24% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
159 repeat relationships — 90 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +221%
- CMCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +65%
- TRTHE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +15%
Funded once
- MRMIND RESEARCH INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $400k
United States Association for UNHCRone grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -62%
SHARE OUR STRENGTHone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The lancaster chamber of commerce & industry's mission is to create the environment, facilitate partnerships, and lead on issues that elevate business success. the chamber has 5 strategic priorities: public policy, workforce, business…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Better Health Foundation Melinda Gowey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
200 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 200 of the 351 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR SCIENCE & THE PUBLIC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) ↗
- Who funds PROJECT LEAD THE WAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds BONNEVILLE ENVIRONMENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
- Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds STEM NEXT OPPORTUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Forests ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE ENTREPRENEURSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIC INNOVATION IN ↗
- Who funds PFLAG ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION FOUNDATION OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · Eqt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Lancaster County Community Foundation · Scott County Regional Authority · The Steinman Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · McElhattan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arconic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bonneville Environmental Foundation — 100% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arconic Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Arconic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.