Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Arts & Culture$2.1MHealth$1.4MEducation$1.4MHuman Services$997kYouth Development$610kScience & Tech$295kFood & Nutrition$235kCrime & Legal$213kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $675k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNTHSC FOUNDATION$300,000
FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$175,000
TEXAS ACADEMY 4$75,000
CRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH$75,000
JEWEL CHARITY BALL INC$50,000
RIVERTREE ACADEMY$50,000
SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$50,000
FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$50,000
THE NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM$50,000
TARRANT TO AND THROUGH PARTNERSHIP$50,000
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC$50,000
BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS$45,000
ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$39,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $911k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $50k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $50k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $50k → 11%LEARNING CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS: $20k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $7k → 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $10k → 11%CLAYTON CHILD CARE INC: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $50k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $50k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $50k → 11%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $31k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $40k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $20k → 11%6 Stones Mission Network: $28k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $40k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $20k → 11%6 Stones Mission Network: $25k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $40k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $20k → 11%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $20k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $40k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $15k → 11%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $20k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $40k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.0M · 35 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
37

Total granted

$7.0M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+6%

Still filing today

63%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TEXAS ACADEMY 4
    5× · 2020–2025 · $405k · revenue +210%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $395k · revenue +1%
  • RA
    RIVERTREE ACADEMY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $385k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • JF
    JPS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +33%
  • SB
    SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LEVITT PAVILION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +133%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
2
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
3
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
4
Fort Worth Country Day School Inc

The mission of fort worth country day school is to foster the intellectual, physical, emotional and ethical development of capable students through an academically rigorous college preparatory program that integrates the arts and athletics.

Education
5
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
6
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
7
Fort Worth Christain School Inc

Fort worth christian school is a christ-centered community where every child is loved, valued, taught excellence in and out of the classroom, and empowered by a biblical worldview for a lifetime of faith and service.

Education
8
Fort Worth Academy for the Education of Children and Youth

Education of children and youth

Education
9
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
10
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
11
Texas Foundation for Educational Advancement Inc dba the Da Vinci School

School's mission is to help establish basic skills through teaching methods that enhance a child's joy in learning, ability to learn, and interest in learning while fostering the child's self-confidence.

Education
12
Trinity School of Midland Texas

The mission of trinity school is to be a college preparatory community that provides a nurturing environment to enrich the mind, strengthen the body, enliven the soul, and inspire servant leadership.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clayton Child Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Hospital SystemsFort Worth Area Civic Organ…Industry Trade AssociationsFamily Support and Child Se…Independent K-12 SchoolsFort Worth Community Instit…Pediatric Health Care SystemPediatric Healthcare SystemChristian Missionary Organi…International Orphan CareTarrant County Social Servi…Family Foundations & Arts P…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%2%<5yr16%4%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr9%30%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%4%<5yr16%2%5–10yr18%36%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr9%30%35–55yr13%21%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/54
the rest of the field
16%
1,565/9,702

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
34/51
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $1,200,000 · OtherFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCEIndividual grant recipient — $325,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS — $175,000 · OtherBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC — $295,000 · OtherBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INCCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $209,110 · Other+35 more — $2,106,591 · Other+35 moreUNTHSC FOUNDATION — $900,000 · EducationUNTHSC FOUNDATIONBYNUM SCHOOL — $130,000 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOLNEW KEY SCHOOL INC — $110,000 · EducationNEW KEY SCHOOL IN…TRINITY VALLEY SCHOOL — $75,000 · EducationTRINITY VALLEY SC…THE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC — $65,000 · Education+4 more — $59,500 · EducationSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $350,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN O…CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES — $150,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR …6 STONES MISSION NETWORK — $123,880 · Human Services6 STONES MI…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…HOPE FARM INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM I…LENA POPE HOME INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE H…+5 more — $61,815 · Human Services+5 moreFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $395,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORT…NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC — $200,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL …PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC — $50,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMIN…Van Cliburn Foundation Inc — $50,000 · Arts & CultureVan Clibu…Fort Worth Opera Association Inc — $50,000 · Arts & CultureFort Wort…RIVERTREE ACADEMY — $385,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP SUMMIT INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEXAS ACADEMY 4 — $405,000 · Membership BenefitJPS FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX — $75,000 · PhilanthropyBeyond The Burn Foundation — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,560,701Education$1,339,500Human Services$910,695Arts & Culture$745,000Youth Development$505,000Membership Benefit$405,000Philanthropy$350,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION — $900,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetTEXAS ACADEMY 4 — $405,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $395,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY — $385,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $350,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC — $295,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $209,110 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetJPS FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC — $200,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES — $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL — $130,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget6 STONES MISSION NETWORK — $123,880 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNEW KEY SCHOOL INC — $110,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LEVITT PAVILION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCarter BloodCare — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED — $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER — $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $79,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUSH TENNIS CENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHOPE FARM INC — $75,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY VALLEY SCHOOL — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC — $63,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetRIVER LEGACY FOUNDATION — $57,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetBeyond The Burn Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECTHANDUP — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFort Worth Opera Association Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFORGET ME NOT FRANCES — $40,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetCRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLive Thankfully — $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLEARNING CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOVENANT CLASSICAL SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCLAYTON CHILD CARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNTHSC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NEW KEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LEVITT PAVILION INC ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Carter BloodCare ↗
  • Who funds JEWEL CHARITY BALL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH CRADLE TO CAREER ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee …Amon G Carter Foundat…Sid W Richardson Foun…Community Foundation …Bnsf Railway Foundati…Leo Potishman Foundat…Communities Foundatio…Helen Irwin Littauer …Garvey Texas Foundati…Crystelle Waggoner Ch…Amon G Carter-Star Te…Wm & Catherine Bryce …
Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX73.6× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Wm & Catherine Bryce Memorial Fund Xxxxx3001

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines