· Private foundation
Wm & Catherine Bryce Memorial Fund Xxxxx3001
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $429k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FORT WORTH REPORT | $150,000 |
| HOPE FARM INC | $75,000 |
| TEXAS A AND M FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ALL SAINTS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH | $50,000 |
| FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC | $50,000 |
| RIVERTREE ACADEMY INC | $50,000 |
| VAN CLIBURN FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF TARRANT COUNTY | $45,000 |
| CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES | $35,000 |
| ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $30,000 |
| LENA POPE HOME | $30,000 |
| METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY | $30,000 |
| RECOVERY RESOURCE COUNCIL | $30,000 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $911k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHENDRICK HOME FOR CHILDREN4× · 2018–2023 · $986k · revenue +12%
- FWFORT WORTH REPORT4× · 2022–2025 · $450k · revenue +13%
- TATexas A&M Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- FWFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $235k · revenue +36%
- KAKimbell Art Foundationone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -46%
- FWFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…
Education of children and youth
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Fort worth christian school is a christ-centered community where every child is loved, valued, taught excellence in and out of the classroom, and empowered by a biblical worldview for a lifetime of faith and service.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
The Fort Worth Community Land Trust (FWCLT) was created to provide relief to the poor and distressed and combat community deterioration. Specifically, FWCLT will create, steward and preserve a permanent supply of safe, secure, and…
To inspire and influence the culture in Fort Worth by joyfully engaging our students with the classics, which are the foundation of Western civilization and point to the most important historical even of humanity, the Incarnation of our…
To act as the voice of business, articulating a business perspective and advocating policies supported by the fort worth general business community.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
At fort worth colonial charities, we are dedicated to empowering the next generation through innovative educational, athletic, and enrichment programs supported by our investment. we believe in fostering not just skills, but confidence and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Worth Country Day School Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Brent Rowan Hyder Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HENDRICK HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH REPORT ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
- Who funds All Saints Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEARTS FOR HOMES ↗
- Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
- Who funds Fort Worth Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds Community Healthcare of Texas ↗
- Who funds TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
- Who funds Kimbell Art Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH CHAMBER DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNTHSC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE PARENTING CENTER ↗
- Who funds TARRANT COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · The Morris Foundation · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wm & Catherine Bryce Memorial Fund Xxxxx3001 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.