Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$2.3MArts & Culture$2.1MHealth$1.9MEducation$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.2MAnimals$695kYouth Development$581kEnvironment$565kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.7M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM & HALL OF FAME$500,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$425,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES$300,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION$250,000
FORT WORTH BOTANIC GARDEN$250,000
UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY$200,000
CASA MANANA INC$150,000
CANCER CARE SERVICES$150,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH$125,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CHISHOLM TRAIL$125,000
STREAMS & VALLEYS INC$100,000
KIMBELL ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION$100,000
WI COOK FOUNDATION INC$100,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF TARRANT COUNTY$80,000
CARTER BLOODCARE$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 9%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $20k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $30k → 14%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $10k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $125k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $50k → 14%THE CONCILIO: $25k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $50k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $30k → 11%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH: $30k → 11%SIXTY & BETTER INC: $50k → 11%SIXTY & BETTER INC: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10k → 11%CLAYTON CHILD CARE INC: $75k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $60k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $50k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $50k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $50k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $50k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC: $50k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $20k → 11%ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC: $40k → 11%ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC: $25k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $15k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $300k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $20k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $50k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $50k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $35k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 40 repeat orgs$6.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
37

Total granted

$5.6M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

70%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $555k · revenue +54%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    2× · 2022–2025 · $525k · revenue +14%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES
    2× · 2022–2025 · $320k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • PM
    PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND
    one grant, 2024 · $315k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
3
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
4
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
5
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
12
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council and the most unlike its peers is Kimbell Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySchool Sports and Arts Boos…Tarrant County Social Servi…Faith-Based Healthcare Syst…Community Support ServicesCommunity Support ServicesK-12 Education SupportIndustry Trade AssociationsEmergency Assistance Servic…Faith-Based K-12 SchoolsArts and Culture Organizati…Fort Worth Business & Commu…Regional Healthcare SystemsFamily Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr9%42%35–55yr13%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr9%45%35–55yr13%43%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/71
the rest of the field
16%
1,565/9,685

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/70
Grantees still filing
41/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Tarrant Area Food Bank — $525,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankIndividual grant recipient — $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND — $315,000 · OtherPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE ANDFORT WORTH BOTANIC GARDEN — $250,000 · OtherRONALD MC DONALD HOUSE OF — $180,000 · OtherTEXAS HEALTH HARRIS METHODIST HOSPITAL — $165,000 · Other+44 more — $2,855,950 · Other+44 moreNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC — $500,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL COWGIRL…FORT WORTH ART ASSOCIATION — $250,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH ART A…FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $175,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH SYMPH…Fort Worth Opera Association Inc — $175,000 · Arts & CultureFort Worth Opera…CASA MANANA INC — $150,000 · Arts & CultureCASA MANANA INCKimbell Art Foundation — $100,000 · Arts & CultureKimbell Art Foun…Van Cliburn Foundation Inc — $85,000 · Arts & CultureSTAGE WEST THEATRE FORMERLY ALLIED THEATRE GROUP INC — $80,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $180,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES — $320,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRA…LENA POPE HOME INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $130,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF T…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $125,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARI…Tarrant County Association For the Blind — $115,000 · Human ServicesTarrant County…ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC — $115,000 · Human ServicesARLINGTON CHAR…YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $110,000 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metrop…SIXTY AND BETTER INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesSIXTY AND BETT…CLAYTON CHILD CARE INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC — $70,000 · Human Services+8 more — $250,000 · Human Services+8 moreAll Saints Health Foundation — $300,000 · HealthAll Saints Hea…Texas Health Resources Foundation — $250,000 · HealthTexas Health R…CANCER CARE SERVICES — $210,000 · HealthCANCER CARE SE…Texas Health Resources — $200,000 · HealthTexas Health R…WI Cook Foundation Inc — $175,000 · HealthWI Cook Founda…Carter BloodCare — $125,000 · HealthCarter BloodCa…Wise Health Foundation — $100,000 · HealthWise Health Fo…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $60,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $50,000 · HealthTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTI…UNTHSC FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNTHSC FOUNDA…ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationANGELO STATE …NEW KEY SCHOOL INC — $85,000 · EducationNEW KEY SCHOO…GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $65,000 · Education+2 more — $65,000 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $555,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTHWESTERN EXPOSITION AND LIVESTOCK SHOW — $25,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX — $40,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,790,950Arts & Culture$1,695,000Human Services$1,545,000Health$1,470,000Education$1,415,000Food & Nutrition$580,000Philanthropy$240,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $555,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank — $525,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES — $320,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAll Saints Health Foundation — $300,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFORT WORTH ART ASSOCIATION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES — $210,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTexas Health Resources — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY — $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $175,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc — $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFort Worth Opera Association Inc — $175,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSTATE FAIR OF TEXAS — $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC — $135,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $130,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $130,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas — $130,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE — $125,950 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE CHISHOLM TRAIL INC — $125,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCarter BloodCare — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant County Association For the Blind — $115,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetARLINGTON CHARITIES INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $110,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKimbell Art Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWise Health Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSIXTY AND BETTER INC — $100,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc — $85,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNEW KEY SCHOOL INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSTAGE WEST THEATRE FORMERLY ALLIED THEATRE GROUP INC — $80,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetThe YouthVantage Alliance — $80,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC — $70,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetRecovery Resource Council — $70,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $65,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Fort Worth Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $40,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee …Sid W Richardson Foun…Amon G Carter Foundat…Ann L Rhodes and Caro…Leo Potishman Foundat…Garvey Texas Foundati…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Community Foundation …Helen Irwin Littauer …Mary Potishman Lard T…Amon G Carter-Star Te…The Morris Foundation
Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX85.6× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002 · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · The Morris Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines