· Public charity
PC Charitable Foundation
The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "code"), or any corresponding section of any future federal tax code, by and through any lawful act or activity for which nonprofit corporations may be formed under…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $1,998,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,141,415 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $142,915 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k9 grants · $234k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $700k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE COLUMBUS FOUNDATION | $700,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA | $140,000 |
| NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH LAW | $100,000 |
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| STEM NOLA | $100,000 |
| ADVANCEMENT PROJECT | $100,000 |
| THE TRIGGER PROJECT | $75,000 |
| DETROIT PEOPLES COMMUNITY | $50,000 |
| TIDES CENTER | $50,000 |
| CENTER FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE | $50,000 |
| THE GAULT CENTER | $50,000 |
| DETROIT HEALS DETROIT | $50,000 |
| NOT ANOTHER CHILD | $50,000 |
| KC UNCORNERED | $50,000 |
| CLEVELAND PEACEMAKERS ALLIANCE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $655k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $554k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNational Center for Youth Law5× · 2019–2024 · $510k · revenue +27%
- CICOMP-U-DOPT INC4× · 2020–2023 · $471k · revenue +286%
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA2× · 2023–2024 · $280k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- HCHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INCone grant, 2019 · $350k · revenue -31%
YEAR UP INCone grant, 2020 · $350k · revenue -18%- PEPOLICING EQUITYone grant, 2020 · $350k · revenue -84%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…
With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
To educate and inspire young people to succeed in a global economy.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
Accelerate momentum for justice reform and public safety innovation in every corner of the country. the just trust for education works to create stronger, more resilient state and national advocacy and public education ecosystems that can…
Access youth's mission is to empower vulnerable youth with the tools they need to stay in school, graduate on time and avoid the justice system, through mediation and restorative justice.
See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chiefs for Change and the most unlike its peers is Women and Kids Empowerment Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE GAULT CENTER ↗
- Who funds National Center for Youth Law ↗
- Who funds COMP-U-DOPT INC ↗
- Who funds CHIEFS FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds CATALYST CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds POLICING EQUITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds TURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
- Who funds ADVANCEMENT PROJECT EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds DIGITAL PIONEERS ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE INNOVATIVE TRAINING OF YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRIGGER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE THROUGH SPORT ↗
- Who funds EVOLVE INC ↗
- Who funds ROOTED SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds STUDY GROUP SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NOT ANOTHER CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds CORE INFLUENCER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Big Picture Foundation ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PEOPLES COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Detroit Heals Detroit Inc ↗
- Who funds THE YUNION ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND PEACEMAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds TEACHING FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds JONATHAN JONES NEXT STEP FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Schools Fund · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Gates Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · New Venture Fund · Nfl Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Share Our Strength
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization PC Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to PC Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to PC Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.