· Private foundation
Children Count Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $416k
- $250k+2 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASHESI UNIVERSITY Foundation | $300,000 |
| Stanford University | $250,000 |
| SEATTLE SYMPHONY | $180,937 |
| Technology Access Foundation | $120,000 |
| Asian American Justice Center | $115,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $29,000 |
| THE KEY TO CHANGE | $20,000 |
| American Constitution Society | $9,000 |
| Mt Baker Community Club | $9,000 |
| Kuow | $9,000 |
| Wikimedia Foundation | $9,000 |
| ALLIED ARTS FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| 261 Fearless | $7,000 |
| Book it Repertory Theater | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AUASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $768k · revenue +17%
- AAASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC5× · 2020–2024 · $581k · revenue +25%
TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $462k · revenue +49%
Funded once
CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUNDone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +17%- NANORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUMone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue -23%
- 2F261 Fearlessone grant, 2022 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.
To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.
Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.
The seattle public library foundation inspires the community's philanthropic support, advocacy for, and pride in the library.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights by supporting the aclu-wa foundation.
The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…
University of puget sound, as a community of learning, maintains a strong commitment to teaching excellence, scholarly engagement, and fruitful student-faculty interaction. the mission of the university is to develop in its students'…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Earth Creative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
- Who funds TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KEY TO CHANGE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
- Who funds LESCHI PTA ↗
- Who funds THE MT BAKER COMMUNITY CLUB ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Allied Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 261 FEARLESS INC ↗
- Who funds EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Book-It Repertory Theatre ↗
- Who funds Seattle Chamber Music Festival ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUSH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MUSIC OF REMEMBRANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Artsfund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Lucky Seven Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Ridge Road Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Children Count Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.