Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peach Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$806k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Environment$1.1MArts & Culture$806kFood & Nutrition$737kEducation$312kRecreation & Sports$275kPhilanthropy$176kHuman Services$123kYouth Development$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $559k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $223k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$71,000
YWCA$52,000
FOOD LIFELINE$50,000
HERITAGE UNIVERSITY$50,000
SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION$30,000
ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$30,000
KEY TO CHANGE$30,000
TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION$25,000
SEATTLE REPERTORY THEATER$25,000
TOWN HALL ASSOCIATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE (DBA UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK)$25,000
RE SOURCES$25,000
GRUB$25,000
PIKE MARKET FOOD BANK$25,000
SEADOC SOCIETY - UC DAVIS FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHELAN DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $20k → 9%PIKE MARKET FOOD BANK: $25k → 9%PIKE MARKET FOOD BANK: $15k → 9%CHELAN DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $20k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE (DBA UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK): $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $25k → 9%KEIRO NORTHWEST: $720 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 43 repeat orgs$973k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
46

Total granted

$2.7M
$843k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+27%

Still filing today

74%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FOOD LIFELINE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +6%
  • SEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS
    4× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +24%
  • HU
    HERITAGE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $105k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • BM
    BURKE MUSEUMUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2022 · $46k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Architectural Foundation

The Seattle Architecture Foundation connects people to the architecture, design, and history of Seattle. We believe the more you engage with design, the more you feel connected to your changing city. As a volunteer driven organization, we…

Arts & Culture
2
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
3
Discover Your Northwest

Discover Your Northwest promotes the discovery of northwest public lands, enriches the experience of visitors and builds community stewardship of these special places today and for generations to come.

Recreation & Sports
4
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
5
Artist Trust

Artist Trust supports the livelihoods of artists working in all disciplines to create a more vibrant and equitable Washington State.

Arts & Culture
6
Puget Sound Restoration Fund

To restore habitat, water quality and native species in the puget sound

Environment
7
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

—
8
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
9
Stewardship Partners

Stewardship Partners helps private landowners restore and preserve the natural landscapes of WA State. We collaborate with diverse interest groups to build bridges and find solutions that achieve mutual goals of environmental protection,…

Environment
10
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
11
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
12
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Repertory Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyParks and Landscape Conserv…Pacific Northwest Conservat…Community College Foundatio…Food Banks and Hunger ReliefLive Performance & Arts Edu…Independent Schools and Ear…Youth Mentoring & Developme…Student Success & College P…Housing & Community Support…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr12%42%35–55yr12%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr19%27%20–35yr12%45%35–55yr12%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/58
the rest of the field
13%
1,869/14,157

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
42/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $106,500 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $105,000 · OtherWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherTREES FOR NEIGHBORHOODS (UW BOTANIC GARDENS) — $90,000 · OtherWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $83,720 · OtherWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $70,000 · Other+61 more — $1,397,380 · Other+61 moreRE SOURCES — $95,000 · EnvironmentRE SOURCESThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust — $75,000 · EnvironmentThe Mountains t…CONSERVATION NW — $70,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION NWWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $55,000 · EnvironmentWASHINGTON CONS…ARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EnvironmentARBORETUM FOUND…Sound Action — $35,000 · EnvironmentSound ActionNATUREBRIDGE — $32,000 · EnvironmentNATUREBRIDGENorth Cascades Institute — $30,000 · EnvironmentNorth Cascades …Friends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands — $25,000 · EnvironmentVASHON-MAURY ISLAND LAND TRUST — $20,000 · EnvironmentBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST — $20,000 · EnvironmentSEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS — $115,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE YOUT…Town Hall Association — $75,000 · Arts & CultureTown Hall As…Orcas Island Chamber Music Festival — $75,000 · Arts & CultureOrcas Island…KEY TO CHANGE — $60,000 · Arts & CultureKEY TO CHANG…BURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $35,500 · Arts & CultureBURKE MUSEUM…SYMPHONY TACOMA — $20,000 · Arts & CultureHEDGEBROOK — $14,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $10,500 · Arts & CultureFOOD LIFELINE — $250,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFE…BACKPACK BRIGADE — $80,000 · Food & NutritionBACKPACK …FRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT — $100,000 · Community ImprovementTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $2,000 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $175,000 · PhilanthropyHERITAGE UNIVERSITY — $105,000 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARS — $38,000 · Education+1 more — $2,000 · Education
Other$2,057,600Environment$507,000Arts & Culture$405,000Food & Nutrition$330,000Community Improvement$202,000Philanthropy$175,000Education$145,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD LIFELINE — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS — $115,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY — $105,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS — $105,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $105,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetRE SOURCES — $95,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $83,720 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBACKPACK BRIGADE — $80,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetTown Hall Association — $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetThe Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust — $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOrcas Island Chamber Music Festival — $75,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCONSERVATION NW — $70,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEY TO CHANGE — $60,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $55,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION — $51,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCascade Youth Symphony — $50,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARBORETUM FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPIKE MARKET SENIOR CENTER — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS — $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBURKE MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $35,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSound Action — $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNATUREBRIDGE — $32,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNorth Cascades Institute — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFORTISSIMO — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOEDEL RESERVE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFriends of the Anacortes Community Forest Lands — $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN FEED — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSYMPHONY TACOMA — $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVASHON-MAURY ISLAND LAND TRUST — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINVEST IN YOUTH — $13,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSEATTLE REPERTORY THEATRE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNW Childrens Foundation — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRAINIER PREP — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIKE PLACE MARKET FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…Moccasin Lake Foundat…ArtsfundMightycause Charitabl…Wyman Youth TrustThe Bullitt FoundationLucky Seven FoundationGrousemont FoundationReal Progress Foundat…Medina Foundation
Seattle FoundationWA59× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Artsfund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Bullitt Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · Medina Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peach Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Peach Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Peach Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines