Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arakawa Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$935k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$2.0MArts & Culture$859kEmployment$500kHuman Services$225kPhilanthropy$185kYouth Development$175k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $900k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENISE LOUIE EDUCATION CENTER$150,000
RAINIER SCHOLARS$150,000
SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC$150,000
TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION$150,000
COLLEGE SUCCESS FOUNDATION$100,000
WING LUKE MUSEUM$50,000
SCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON$50,000
YEAR UP INC$50,000
BELONG PARTNERS$50,000
EDUCATION FIRST$15,000
JIM SAUNDERS FUND$10,000
KUKIO HOOMANA FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $125k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 16 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$3.7M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+116%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $450k · revenue +3%
  • RS
    RAINIER SCHOLARS
    4× · 2018–2024 · $431k · revenue +282%
  • TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2024 · $385k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • T
    TREEHOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +116%
  • Book-It Repertory Theatre
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -95%
  • KC
    KUKI'O COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Impact Public Schools

The mission of Impact Public Schools is to prepare a diverse student population to succeed in college and impact communities as the next generation of equity-driven, innovative leaders. (Continued on Schedule O)Impact Public Schools makes…

Education
2
Seattle JazzED

Through Jazz education that liberates and inspires, Seattle JazzED increase access in the music room, celebrates student expression, and builds lasting connection rooted in community.

Arts & Culture
3
Alameda Education Foundation

AEF serves as a critical bridge toward equitable and inclusive educational outcomes for Alameda TK-12 public school students.

4
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
5
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
6
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

7
Lev Foundation

LEV Foundation acts to serve the interests of students and families across the State of Washington to improve education access and quality. Particularly those who have been harmed by historical and systemic inequities.

Civil Rights
8
Economic Opportunity Institute

Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.

Community Improvement
9
Pathwaves Washington

Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.

Education
10
Alliance for Education

Our mission is to support excellence in education by advancing educational justice and racial equity for students in Seattle Public Schools.

Education
11
The Washington Stem Center

Washington stem (wa stem) is a statewide, education nonprofit leveraging stem for social change, removing barriers to credential attainment, and creating pathways to long-term economic security for systemically underserved students.…

Education
12
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School's Out Washington and the most unlike its peers is Book-It Repertory Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Denise Louie Education center — $450,000 · EducationDenise Louie Education centerRAINIER SCHOLARS — $431,118 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARSCollege Success Foundation — $300,000 · EducationCollege Success FoundationEQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITION — $247,700 · EducationEQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITIONYEAR UP INC — $200,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCTechbridge Girls — $125,000 · EducationTechbridge Girls+1 more — $28,600 · EducationSEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $450,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE SYMP…WING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $359,317 · OtherWING LUKE ME…Book-It Repertory Theatre — $50,000 · OtherBook-It Repe…+1 more — $10,000 · OtherTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION — $385,000 · Community ImprovementTECHNOLOGY …FARESTART — $300,000 · EmploymentSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBELONG Partners — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSE — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $145,283 · PhilanthropyTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND — $30,000 · PhilanthropyKUKIO HOOMANA FUND — $20,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyBrightspark Early Learning Services — $175,000 · Human Services
Education$1,782,418Arts & Culture$450,000Other$419,317Community Improvement$385,000Employment$300,000Youth Development$225,000Philanthropy$205,283Human Services$175,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $450,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDenise Louie Education center — $450,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS — $431,118 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION — $385,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $359,317 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetCollege Success Foundation — $300,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFARESTART — $300,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEQUITY IN EDUCATION COALITION — $247,700 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrightspark Early Learning Services — $175,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTechbridge Girls — $125,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSCHOOL'S OUT WASHINGTON — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBELONG Partners — $75,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBook-It Repertory Theatre — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND — $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetEDUCATION FIRST — $28,600 over 2y, 12% of budgetKUKIO HOOMANA FUND — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA24.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gates Foundation · United Way of King County · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Wyman Youth Trust · Stolte Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arakawa Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph