· Public charity
Cambiar Education
Cambiar's vision is to spark creative change by scaling bold ideas that undeniably prove that every student can succeed and thrive.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 52 grants below total $4,092,592 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,285,341 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $192,749 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $564k
- $50k–250k28 grants · $2.6M
- $250k+3 grants · $937k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ContigoED | $388,923 |
| Learner-Centered Collaborative | $297,650 |
| The Big Picture Company dba Big Picture Learning | $250,000 |
| EL Education | $181,334 |
| City Year | $180,000 |
| High Resolves America | $142,600 |
| Schoolhack Solutions (dba LiFTLearning) | $130,000 |
| Teach for America | $125,000 |
| America Succeeds | $125,000 |
| Global Impact | $125,000 |
| TalkingPoints | $125,000 |
| Tides Center | $106,950 |
| Study Group Solutions Inc | $100,000 |
| InnovateEDU Inc | $100,000 |
| The Flight School | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UUndauntedK122× · 2023–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +18% · 66% of their budget
- CEContigo Ed Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +301% · 46% of their budget
- B2BUILDING 212× · 2023–2024 · $291k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- DFDREAMS FOR KIDSone grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -97%
- THThe History Co-Lab Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $140k · revenue +41%
- MTMASTERY TRANSCRIPT CONSORTIUMone grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…
ILearn Collaborative creates equity in education by building the capacity of educators to implement student-centered learning. We provide professional development, consulting services and a wide variety of digital resources, and we welcome…
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.
See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…
Blue engine optimizes how educators work together to create engaging, individualized learning experiences for students.
The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…
Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.
The Center for the Future of Learning empowers a vibrant learning ecosystem connecting communities to create future-focused solutions for today while sharing effective practices to advance tomorrow. The Center for the Future of Learning…
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…
New teacher center (ntc) is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to improving outcomes for all students by accelerating teacher and school leader effectiveness. from preschool through high school, (continued on schedule o)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nxut. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 40% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UndauntedK12 ↗
- Who funds Contigo Ed Inc ↗
- Who funds LEARNER-CENTERED COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds BUILDING 21 ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds THE BIG PICTURE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds TALKINGPOINTS ↗
- Who funds EL EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds DREAMS FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds HIGH RESOLVES AMERICA ↗
- Who funds The History Co-Lab Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICA SUCCEEDS ↗
- Who funds Village Of Wisdom ↗
- Who funds THE MIND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY DESIGN COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds MASTERY TRANSCRIPT CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds Family Engagement Lab ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ACADEMY FOR AEROSPACE AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA ALLIANCE FOR BLACK CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds VALOR COLLEGIATE ACADEMIES ↗
- Who funds INNOVATEEDU INC ↗
- Who funds STUDY GROUP SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Flight School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ABILITY CHALLENGE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLACK MALE EDUCATORS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds GREAT LAKES ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Schools Fund · Gates Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Knowledgeworks Foundation · Overdeck Family Foundation Inc · Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cambiar Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.