Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

All Points North Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$3.0MEnvironment$1.7MYouth Development$450kHousing & Shelter$333kScience & Tech$234kHealth$220kArts & Culture$206kHuman Services$120kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $368k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $817k
$40,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAHUS INSTITUTE$100,000
RIVER CITY HOUSING$66,667
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & ENERGY FOUNDATION$66,667
Individual grant recipient$66,667
EDEN VILLAGE OF WILMINGTON$66,667
POWERMYLEARNING$60,000
ANN RICHARDS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$60,000
CITIZEN SCHOOLS$60,000
TEACHUNITED$60,000
SISTERS CIRCLE$60,000
WE CARE SOLAR$50,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MEMPHIS$50,000
ECORISE$50,000
TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS$40,000
SAFE HAVEN FARMS$33,333
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $40k → 13%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $20k → 5%ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUCCESS: $40k → 7%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of All Points North Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 9% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 6% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

All Points North Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 38 repeat orgs$874k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
8

Total granted

$5.7M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+198%

Still filing today

84%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $527k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureScience & TechYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TEACHUNITED
    6× · 2019–2024 · $383k · revenue +68%
  • TA
    The Ann Richards School Foundation
    7× · 2018–2024 · $357k · revenue +1%
  • ES
    Everybody Solar
    6× · 2018–2024 · $280k · revenue +653% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • MA
    MACON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +198%
  • BI
    BEND INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +7%
  • DV
    DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE
    one grant, 2023 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
EarthGen Fka Wa Green Schools

EarthGens mission is to guide and support youth, educators, and school communities to become leaders for a healthy environment.

Environment
2
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
3
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
4
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
5
Impact Public Schools

The mission of Impact Public Schools is to prepare a diverse student population to succeed in college and impact communities as the next generation of equity-driven, innovative leaders. (Continued on Schedule O)Impact Public Schools makes…

Education
6
Community Resources for Science

CRS empowers teachers and STEM professionals serving schools in historically marginalized communities to activate TK-8 students curiosity about the world, foster critical thinking, and inspire children to imagine future career pathways.…

Education
7
The National Center on Education and the Economy

The Center is dedicated to providing tools the nation needs to lead the world in education & training in a swiftly globalizing world economy.

Public Benefit
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
Clean Energy Transition Institute

The Clean Energy Transition Institute (CETI) is an independent, nonpartisan research and analysis nonprofit whose mission is to accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest.

Education
10
Out Teach

Out teach's mission is to inspire and prepare today's elementary students to explore the wonders of science and become tomorrow's innovators. out teach works to ensure that all studentsregardless of race, zip code, or access to…

Education
11
Tcs Education System

TCS Education System prepares innovative, engaged, purposeful agents of change who serve our global community.

Education
12
Partners in School Innovation

To transform teaching and learning in the lowest-performing public schools so that every student, regardless of background, thrives.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizen Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eden Village of Wilmington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsEquine Therapy ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportSchool Parent OrganizationsCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…School District FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Construc…Community Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,520

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
28/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEACHUNITED — $383,333 · EducationTEACHUNITEDThe Ann Richards School Foundation — $357,000 · EducationThe Ann Richards School Foundatio…CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $320,000 · EducationCITIZEN SCHOOLS INCTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE — $251,668 · EducationTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVEINSTITUTO NUEVA ESCUELA INC — $203,000 · EducationINSTITUTO NUEVA ESCUELA INCENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS — $140,000 · EducationENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS+6 more — $310,000 · Education+6 moreGRID ALTERNATIVES — $400,000 · OtherGRID ALTERNATIVESEDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC — $120,000 · OtherEDUCATION OPENS DOORS INCMOLAB INC — $120,000 · OtherMOLAB INCCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS WASHINGTON — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $66,667 · OtherRIVER CITY HOUSING INC — $66,667 · OtherWE CARE SOLAR — $110,000 · OtherWE CARE SOLARRising Sun Center for Opportunity fka RISING SUN ENERGY CENTER — $80,000 · OtherEmerald Coast Fitness Foundation — $80,000 · OtherREMOTE ENERGY — $100,000 · OtherAmerican Museum of Science & Energy FoundationInc — $66,667 · Other+12 more — $605,558 · Other+12 moreEverybody Solar — $280,000 · EnvironmentEverybody SolarRESOURCE CENTRAL — $197,283 · EnvironmentRESOURCE CENTRALSPARK NORTHWEST — $180,000 · EnvironmentSPARK NORTHWESTSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL — $180,000 · EnvironmentSOLAR ENERGY INTER…AMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY INC — $155,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN SOLAR ENE…EcoRise Youth Innovations — $50,000 · EnvironmentTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentPowerMyLearning Inc — $468,300 · Science & TechPowerMyLe…The Rahus Institute — $100,000 · Science & TechThe Rahus…SAFE HAVEN FARMS INC — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterMACON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $80,000 · Housing & ShelterEden Village of Wilmington — $66,667 · Housing & ShelterBend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterSisters Circle Inc — $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentNorth Andover Historical Society — $100,000 · Arts & CultureOLD ART BUILDING — $80,000 · Arts & CultureTANTASQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,965,001Other$1,915,559Environment$1,082,283Science & Tech$568,300Housing & Shelter$406,667Youth Development$400,000Arts & Culture$247,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPowerMyLearning Inc — $468,300 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetTEACHUNITED — $383,333 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetThe Ann Richards School Foundation — $357,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $320,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetEverybody Solar — $280,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetSisters Circle Inc — $260,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE — $251,668 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetINSTITUTO NUEVA ESCUELA INC — $203,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetRESOURCE CENTRAL — $197,283 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSPARK NORTHWEST — $180,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL — $180,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSAFE HAVEN FARMS INC — $160,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetAMERICAN SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY INC — $155,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS — $140,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $140,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATION OPENS DOORS INC — $120,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetWE CARE SOLAR — $110,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNorth Andover Historical Society — $100,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetREMOTE ENERGY — $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetOLD ART BUILDING — $80,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetMACON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $80,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetRising Sun Center for Opportunity fka RISING SUN ENERGY CENTER — $80,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetEmerald Coast Fitness Foundation — $80,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetEden Village of Wilmington — $66,667 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetRIVER CITY HOUSING INC — $66,667 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBroward Education Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR MIDDLE LEVEL EDUCATION — $60,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSCIENCE FROM SCIENTISTS INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTANTASQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetBend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond Differences — $60,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBEND INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC — $60,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MEMPHIS — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEcoRise Youth Innovations — $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES — $40,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTNTP INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY CENTERS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Marin Community Found…ImpactassetsincTruist Foundation IncThe San Francisco Fou…Xcel Energy FoundationBoston Foundation IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Truist Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization All Points North Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Kor Community Land Trust Dba Rootedhomes — 63% of income from government
  • Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity — 17% of income from government
  • Bend International School Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to All Points North Foundation?

Find your warmest path to All Points North Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home