How much did ALL POINTS NORTH FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Education$1.8MEnvironment$930kHousing & Shelter$407kYouth Development$400kScience & Tech$280kArts & Culture$248kHealth$170kRecreation & Sports$160kCommunity Improvement$100kOther$2.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

rosebudsolar powerdrive school-wideschool-wide innovationinnovation aroundaround personalizedpersonalized digital

2019

waterempowerrosebudsolar powerdrive school-wideschool-wide innovationinnovation around

2020

waterempowerrosebudsolar powerdrive school-wideschool-wide innovationinnovation around

2021

dedicatedcultivatefutureinspireempowerdecisionsoffer

2022

techmount solarprofessionalsocial emotionalsolar installationemotional learningnet

2023

spotlight solarmaterialssciencevideosmount solarsolar installationsocial emotional

2024

materials solareducator personalizedpersonalized teacherteacher coachingcoaching assessmentsassessments studentsstudents prioritize

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k14 grants · $368k
$50k–250k13 grants · $817k

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

RAHUS INSTITUTE$100,000
RIVER CITY HOUSING$66,667
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & ENERGY FOUNDATION$66,667
HAMMOND CLIMATE SOLUTIONS$66,667
EDEN VILLAGE OF WILMINGTON$66,667
ANN RICHARDS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$60,000
SISTERS CIRCLE$60,000
TEACHUNITED$60,000
POWERMYLEARNING$60,000
CITIZEN SCHOOLS$60,000
ECORISE$50,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MEMPHIS$50,000
WE CARE SOLAR$50,000
TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS$40,000
EVERYBODY SOLAR$33,333

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of ALL POINTS NORTH FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 9% of the giving stays in MA; read by stated purpose it is 6% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

ALL POINTS NORTH FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.6M · 40 repeat orgs$978k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.6M

$431k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+52%

Still filing today

70%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $547k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AR
ANN RICHARDS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $357k · revenue +1%
ES
EVERYBODY SOLAR
6× · 2018–2024 · $280k · revenue +1275% · 29% of their budget
BC
BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE
6× · 2017–2023 · $252k · revenue +179%

Funded once

MA
MACON AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +12%
BI
BEND INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +52%
DV
DA VINCI DISCOVERY CENTER OF SCIENCE
one grant, 2023 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Environmental and Energy Study Institute

Educate policymakers about equitable science-based solutions for climate, energy, & the environment

—

Bosque School

Bosque School is a coeducational college preparatory school creating transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate…

Education

Clean Energy Transition Institute

To accelerate an equitable clean energy transition in the Northwest by producing unbiased research and analysis framing economic decarbonization strategies and convening stakeholders to debate the tradeoffs in building the clean energy…

Education

Community Resources for Science

CRS empowers teachers and STEM professionals serving schools in historically marginalized communities to activate TK-8 students curiosity about the world, foster critical thinking, and inspire children to imagine future career pathways.…

Education

Center for Energy and Environment

The Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) is a clean energy nonprofit with decades of special expertise in energy efficiency. Working in homes, buildings, and communities, CEE discovers and deploys the most effective energy solutions to…

Environment

Energy Education Council

Enhancing lives by promoting the safe & efficient use of electricity.

Education

The Royal School System

To provide students the knowledge and skills needed to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education

The Berkeley School

A preschool-8th grade independent school whose mission is to ignite curious minds, awaken generous hearts, and engage a changing world.

—

The River School

Independent school offering programs for infants, toddlers, preschool, and elementary school aged children with and without hearing loss.

Education

Tcs Education System

TCS Education System prepares innovative, engaged, purposeful agents of change who serve our global community.

Education

Silicon Schools Fund Inc

Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.

Education

Deans for Impact

Deans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and instructionally-focused; and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship and the most unlike its peers is The Tower Foundation of San Jose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/43

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

42/43

Grantees still filing

33/43

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,499,475Education$1,821,668Environment$930,000Housing & Shelter$406,667Youth Development$400,000Science & Tech$280,000Arts & Culture$247,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA16.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Nellie Mae Education Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALL POINTS NORTH FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EVERYBODY SOLAR.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~33 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 13.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 451591893 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EVERYBODY SOLAR, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 33 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 29% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to All Points North Foundation?

Find your warmest path to All Points North Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALL POINTS NORTH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to All Points North Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ALL POINTS NORTH FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

43 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to All Points North Foundation?

More from the funding graph